Playing with the trust system of this forum - The Pharmacist - page 2.

2girls

sr. member

Activity: 1002

Merit: 254

Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big

Quote from: TheUltraElite on January 20, 2018, 04:15:29 AM

Quote from: 2girls on January 20, 2018, 02:20:05 AM

Why is he given a chance to revise his stuff after his promotion ? why not before ? WHY NOT RED TAGGED MEMBERS GIVEN A CHANCE ?

Nobody should be given a chance. This liberalism is shit and is the basis of the flood of shit in this forum. But for your information red tags are removed in case people can prove that the claims are false - but for in case of shitposting these tags will not be removed.

Quote

Why dont any of you understand one thing that soon this trust system will be invalid as everyone knows DT members give baseless trust.

They dont. If you dont like this forum get lost.

Quote

Lastly, a person posting shit and you will give him Neg trust, can we ask you to give you to give Negative trust to "The Pharmacist" as he did not did his homework well and he is still newbie as he need to revise some of his stuff , already agreed by a DT member Grin

He has been doing his homework for a long time now. Good thing he is now promoted a bit late in my opinion - he should have been promoted a year back if you ask me.

Revising rating is normal and can happen in due course if the claims are not properly valid. But the way you retaliate I doubt your rating can be removed at all - because you were associated with account sales.

You think your posts are good but
If i were a DT member , i would have Red trust you for this post with this reason :"This user writes generic, 3rd world shitposts. This pollutes bitcointalk to his benefit exclusively. Should NEVER be paid to post"

As i think you post Shit.

Same is being done by the "The Pharmacist" ..

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch on January 20, 2018, 04:28:35 AM

I would much rather have someone just ban the accounts that are doing nothing but clouding the forum with spam. But it is a forum and a forum really is just a giant shit throw of information... but maybe like a flag like Craigslist to flag the post and not the entire account. After all one man's trash is another man's entertainment ;P

This is selection bias. You're seeing the red-tagged accounts that have not yet been banned, because their posts haven't been reported (or seen yet) or some other reason. Perhaps some posts that are lengthy are just chunks of repeated information and thus insubstantial... but when moderators are reviewing a report case, they may not see the context and thus deem it a bad report.

That's where the red trust comes in.

If you would rather have the accounts banned, then why wouldn't you be in agreement with red trusting the account (essentially depriving the owner of high-paying signature campaigns and thus deterring spam).

HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch

full member

Activity: 278

Merit: 100

Quote from: actmyname on January 20, 2018, 04:01:16 AM

Quote from: HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch on January 20, 2018, 03:42:20 AM

Because I thought the trust was suppose to reflect whether a person has scammed, is trying to scam, has stole, is trying to steal, etc. Not that they are bored and can't find better shit to do than try to talk to people outside their bubble (welcome to the world wide web) Hahah It just sucks that someone that hasn't done anything wrong is then forced to wear a Skarlette letter for the remainder of their time on the forum or it just promotes people creating multiple accounts to avoid that.

How about 'scamming the forum'? Scamming the forum out of quality posts.

Would you agree with tagging accounts traders with red trust, because you distrust them? If so then consider the same thing with spammers—that you distrust them—you feel that they are doing harm to the forum in some way and thus give them feedback accordingly.

There should be direct consequences for shittily posting. If it takes a red trust for people to change, then so be it: it acts as a proper deterrent.

I would much rather have someone just ban the accounts that are doing nothing but clouding the forum with spam. But it is a forum and a forum really is just a giant shit throw of information... but maybe like a flag like Craigslist to flag the post and not the entire account. After all one man's trash is another man's entertainment ;P

TheUltraElite

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1253

So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)

Quote from: 2girls on January 20, 2018, 02:20:05 AM

Why is he given a chance to revise his stuff after his promotion ? why not before ? WHY NOT RED TAGGED MEMBERS GIVEN A CHANCE ?

Nobody should be given a chance. This liberalism is shit and is the basis of the flood of shit in this forum. But for your information red tags are removed in case people can prove that the claims are false - but for in case of shitposting these tags will not be removed.

Quote

Why dont any of you understand one thing that soon this trust system will be invalid as everyone knows DT members give baseless trust.

They dont. If you dont like this forum get lost.

Quote

Lastly, a person posting shit and you will give him Neg trust, can we ask you to give you to give Negative trust to "The Pharmacist" as he did not did his homework well and he is still newbie as he need to revise some of his stuff , already agreed by a DT member Grin

He has been doing his homework for a long time now. Good thing he is now promoted a bit late in my opinion - he should have been promoted a year back if you ask me.

Revising rating is normal and can happen in due course if the claims are not properly valid. But the way you retaliate I doubt your rating can be removed at all - because you were associated with account sales.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch on January 20, 2018, 03:42:20 AM

Because I thought the trust was suppose to reflect whether a person has scammed, is trying to scam, has stole, is trying to steal, etc. Not that they are bored and can't find better shit to do than try to talk to people outside their bubble (welcome to the world wide web) Hahah It just sucks that someone that hasn't done anything wrong is then forced to wear a Skarlette letter for the remainder of their time on the forum or it just promotes people creating multiple accounts to avoid that.

How about 'scamming the forum'? Scamming the forum out of quality posts.

Would you agree with tagging accounts traders with red trust, because you distrust them? If so then consider the same thing with spammers—that you distrust them—you feel that they are doing harm to the forum in some way and thus give them feedback accordingly.

There should be direct consequences for shittily posting. If it takes a red trust for people to change, then so be it: it acts as a proper deterrent.

HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch

full member

Activity: 278

Merit: 100

Quote from: actmyname on January 20, 2018, 03:29:23 AM

Quote from: HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch on January 20, 2018, 02:57:31 AM

I feel for you! This site is literally filled with a SHIT TON of assholes with nothing better to do than spam the living fuck out of the forum, transforming it into a cesspool of regurgitated garbage and making a fetid pool out of the boards, because they are so inferior in their shit can English "sir" skills.

FTFY.

The forum is plagued by a cancerous tumor of shitty posts and people who perpetuate them. Regardless of their societal level and income they should not post of they do not know the language. Just as I would not Google translate my posts into Arabic and post on those boards, people whose English skills are sub-par to the level of nonsense should not post. If it takes me more than 3 reads to understand a sentence then the sentence is poorly written.

I do agree with you 100% on that but I just do not think that warrants a negative trust. Maybe another section should be created or a tag could be given that blinks with *I suck at English... I should be in another thread* Hahah Because I thought the trust was suppose to reflect whether a person has scammed, is trying to scam, has stole, is trying to steal, etc. Not that they are bored and can't find better shit to do than try to talk to people outside their bubble (welcome to the world wide web) Hahah It just sucks that someone that hasn't done anything wrong is then forced to wear a Skarlette letter for the remainder of their time on the forum or it just promotes people creating multiple accounts to avoid that.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch on January 20, 2018, 02:57:31 AM

I feel for you! This site is literally filled with a SHIT TON of assholes with nothing better to do than spam the living fuck out of the forum, transforming it into a cesspool of regurgitated garbage and making a fetid pool out of the boards, because they are so inferior in their shit can English "sir" skills.

FTFY.

The forum is plagued by a cancerous tumor of shitty posts and people who perpetuate them. Regardless of their societal level and income they should not post of they do not know the language. Just as I would not Google translate my posts into Arabic and post on those boards, people whose English skills are sub-par to the level of nonsense should not post. If it takes me more than 3 reads to understand a sentence then the sentence is poorly written.

HungryTigerGrouchyCrotch

full member

Activity: 278

Merit: 100

I feel for you! This site is literally filled with a SHIT TON of assholes with nothing better to do than talk shit on people because they are so inferior in their shit can "lives" outside of this this forum. Just because people have some sort of power over others does not mean that they are correct... maybe by their forums terms that they abide by... but anyone with half a brain can see that this is abusing the trust system above and beyond even what other degenerative morons on here do. I'm stoked you took the time to put this together and I think that DT or not they are just DTF (DownToFail) and proud of it Roll Eyes

2girls

sr. member

Activity: 1002

Merit: 254

Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big

Quote from: Lauda on January 20, 2018, 02:02:48 AM

He may need to revise some of his stuff sent prior to his promotion, but that is normal and is going to take some time.

Quote from: 2girls on January 20, 2018, 01:54:38 AM

I think the admin of the forum should note this abuse of trust system by him and Remove his DT power back.

No.

Quote from: 2girls on January 20, 2018, 01:54:38 AM

Other DT members like Lunda / Yahoo etc are doing good job and only giving Negative feedback to the bad people but the "The Pharmacist" is just lol....

What makes you think I don't agree with him tagging shitposting monkeys? Just because I haven't given the same rating to someone, that doesn't mean that I disagree with the sent ones.

Why is he given a chance to revise his stuff after his promotion ? why not before ? WHY NOT RED TAGGED MEMBERS GIVEN A CHANCE ?

Why dont any of you understand one thing that soon this trust system will be invalid as everyone knows DT members give baseless trust.

Lastly, a person posting shit and you will give him Neg trust, can we ask you to give you to give Negative trust to "The Pharmacist" as he did not did his homework well and he is still newbie as he need to revise some of his stuff , already agreed by a DT member Grin

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

He may need to revise some of his stuff sent prior to his promotion, but that is normal and is going to take some time.

Quote from: 2girls on January 20, 2018, 01:54:38 AM

I think the admin of the forum should note this abuse of trust system by him and Remove his DT power back.

No.

Quote from: 2girls on January 20, 2018, 01:54:38 AM

Other DT members like Lunda / Yahoo etc are doing good job and only giving Negative feedback to the bad people but the "The Pharmacist" is just lol....

What makes you think I don't agree with him tagging shitposting monkeys? Just because I haven't given the same rating to someone, that doesn't mean that I disagree with the sent ones.

2girls

sr. member

Activity: 1002

Merit: 254

Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big

"The Pharmacist" has been recently promoted to DT Member and he is abusing this system to his best. Just see the people he gave trust only today. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=487418)

Previously, DT Members give negative trust to only deserving people who really scam someone and it was too with some reference.

This idiot "The Pharmacist" giving red trust with this lame excuse "This user writes generic, 3rd world shitposts. This pollutes bitcointalk to his benefit exclusively. Should NEVER be paid to post." Lolzzzzzzzzzzz

I understand if bitcointalk was his own forum this would make sense but is he who will tell the person posts are shit or not. You cannot give a person negative trust just on this generic statement.

Make me a DT member and i will give negative trust to the whole forum Users Grin

Funny Isn't it ?

I think the admin of the forum should note this abuse of trust system by him and Remove his DT power back.
Other DT members like Lunda / Yahoo etc are doing good job and only giving Negative feedback to the bad people but the "The Pharmacist" is just lol....

Topic: Playing with the trust system of this forum - The Pharmacist - page 2. (Read 999 times)