Topic: Please spread this message to the spoiled-brat Millennials - page 3. (Read 4273 times)

Well anyone can go buy land and own a business in the USA, but I can't buy land nor 100% own a business in many countries in Asia such as the Philippines where I am now.

Leftists will find any excuse to defend their corrupt, horrific, megadeath directed ideology.

They are retards. We conservatives should congregate in our own regions and kick out the leftists. And let them go congregate in their regions where they are most populous. And then let's watch them crash and burn economically. But they will never allow that without war, because all they know how to do is steal.

This process is underway. The USA will break up into regions in the coming decades as Martin Armstrong's computer predicted many years ago.

The leftists are not going to tolerate us. So we have nothing to gain by being nice to them. It is time to divorce from them. There is no way to reason with a leftist, because if they had critical thinking skills, they wouldn't be leftists in the first place. Just accept that they are scum of the earth and there is nothing we can do to help them. Let them destroy themselves and prepare for our self-defense because they will make war against us when we refuse to pay for their stealing.

We conservatives who are productive must let all those leftists go congregate with their other unproductive ilk and let them steal and ass fuck each other into oblivion.

there is a difference between advanced westerners with money or skills going to other countries and helping generate wealth for those countries and muds coming here to leech welfare or work minimum wage and put our own menial workers on the dole

claims to hate capitalism, promotes gambling in his signature, go figure

Not to mention the ridiculous double standard where the conservatives and hardline libertarians believe they have the right to live and work anywhere in the world because capitalism.  But as soon as anyone foreign wants to move there, it's all "filthy immigrants" and "dey took er jerbs", where suddenly the open market doesn't apply to the labour force.  They claim they want small government, but still want someone to "defend" the borders (preferably for free because they're too greedy and self absorbed to pay tax).  They want all the benefits of living in a society but none of the responsibility of maintaining it.  Hate-filled leeches.

Hey there Criptix! Long time no seen,

I was away for a few months but as soon as i come back i see nothing really changed...
It seems that people still spit on socialism without even knowing what they talk about xD
It's a good thing you're here otherwise I'd feel a bit lonely with my brain here!

USA is powerful indeed, but only because they stole resources across the world to finance a huge army to steal even more resources around the world... And they're saying socialism is theft? xD

I always find a bit funny how they believe 50% tax is theft but bombing a country to take the oil there is ok. I guess it's only a question of who you steal

Nothing to add your honor. Anyone believing that shouldn't be allowed to vote xD

I'd just love to know how the hell is USA the strongest nation? What are exactly your criteria? xD

The salient distinction is that the free market by definition means no top-down edicts are directing the outcome, rather the Invisible Hand of opportunity costs are. Free markets anneal to the NATURAL LAW economics of nature. Whereas, top-down edicts do not anneal and become megadeath because of non-intended outcomes. For example, the 57 million who starved in Communist China, because of the top-down management of agriculture. The AGW proponents are trying to achieve a similar megadeath through corrupt top-down governance.




Top-down governance is corrupted also. The leftist's preferred system is just as exploitative as any natural power-law or exponential distribution of wealth. Because giving power to representatives is a power vacuum and thus will always be victors to the most corruptible. The 160 IQ Eric Raymond explained this well:

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=984 (Some Iron Laws of Political Economics)



The unequal distribution of wealth is a fact of nature. There is nothing you can anyone can do about this, other than improving technology so that everyone's standard of living is lifted. The following references are taken from my whitepaper for a new altcoin project I am working on:

J. Doyne Farmer, John Geanakoplos. Power laws in economics and elsewhere. Chapter from a preliminary draft of a book called “Beyond equilibrium and efficiency”, §4.1 Summary of empirical evidence for power laws, p. 15, May 14, 2008.
Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A 299, pp. 213–221, proceedings of NATO workshop Applications of Physics in Economic Modeling, Prague, Feb 2001.
Adrian A. Dragulescu, Victor M. Yakovenko. Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth: A Short Survey. Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures, AIP Conference Proceedings 661, pp. 180-183, Sep 2, 2002.
Victor M. Yakovenko, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.. Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(4), 1703, Dec 2, 2009.
Jean-Philippe Bouchard. Power-laws and Scaling in Finance: Empirical Evidence and Simple Models. Conference on Fractals 2002, Emergent Nature: Patterns, Growth and Scaling in the Sciences, pp. 157–171, Mar 17, 2002.
Xavier Gabaix. Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(1) pp. 185–206, §What Causes Power Laws?, Winter 2016.
Thomas Lux. Financial Power Laws: Empirical Evidence, Models, and Mechanism. Power Laws in the Social Sciences: Discovering Complexity and Non-Equilibrium Dynamics in the Social Universe, §IV. Multi-Agent Models in Behavioral Finance, 2006.


Also the extreme excesses in concentration of wealth are not due to the free market, but are due to the top-down political corruption that the leftists advocate. The solution the leftists advocate is the poison that gives them the reason to advocate their "solution". It is a vicious cycle of ignorance, akin to a dog chasing his tail.

It is quite sad to see such retarded humans destroy themselves and civilization along with it. Repeatedly.



You retards never learn to stop chasing your tail. It is sad. I see you leftists as a cancer and a virus, that I need to inoculate from my life.



CoinCube won't approve of my language, but I use this language because you leftists are evil and violent and the "soft glove" approach doesn't register in your corrupt minds. You need to be told what you really are bluntly and frankly. And moreover, because you always talking so highly of your ethics and you belittle (very condescending tone!) the ethics of the free market proponents, so I just want to put the mirror in your face.

The rich are not evil, this is a common misconception spread by either disinfo agents or cry baby socialists. Whats wrong with being rich? I think that pursuing being rich is one way to make your life have some sort of meaning. This is proved  by your quote, when you mention the study that the professor did when the people that worked harder got the same reward for people that did not work as hard. But, I would like to point out that working hard does not mean having more money, it simply means working hard. Sure, focusing and pursuing a specific goal will most likely help you attain it faster, but its not something that is factual, because it does not happen every time, there are anomalies, every case is special.

Btw, the occupy wall street movement is BS, we should not be occupying corporations but the governments that allow bailouts to happen in the first place.

They seem to not understand that centralized systems are NOT anti-fragile. Perhaps suggest to them to read Nicholas Taleb's books, but I doubt they are smart enough to understand.

I asked my friends who have been echoing similar thoughts to the trump is a terrorist/unqualified mantra, what was the point to even having an election then? Why not just let the democratic party put who ever's turn it is into office?

Of course with the same group of people, Ive been doing my best to explain that the electoral college is a weighting system for the states. Else we would have the united country of new york. The headway so far is that they have agreed that the electoral college was created in the 1700s when there were only thirteen colonies. Im still working on getting them to admit that why would a sovereign state agree to a political union with a system that was unbalanced towards the most populated areas. Ie: they are all about the popular vote is all that matters, not the fact that trump won ~2500 counties and hillary ~ 250

As far as I know, there is no single man-created government system that can be called perfect...most of them are just downright failure. Socialism is good to think but when it is fully implemented it won't really work for long. What can be the best is to take some of its nice and working principles and introduce them to the usual capitalistic structure and work out a fusion system that can benefit many if not all.

And yes, it is true that when you take away the possible rewards for anything we do and you make things equal then everybody would just be lazy...this is actually the reason why China and many other nations abandoned the pure socialism principles.

Human nature is something no law and no system can change.

At least there are some free-thinking Millennials:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/civil-unrest/how-professors-are-engaging-in-undermining-the-country-in-collages/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQvHAh9c9f4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWs0I98vnso

Perhaps the best explanation I have ever heard:

https://www.prageru.com/courses/left-and-right-differences/how-do-we-make-society-better-left-vs-right-5

(Sourced by CoinCube)

---

Edit: btw, I agree with the following, except the problem is that divorce has destroyed the benefit for men:

https://www.prageru.com/courses/life-studies/be-man-get-married

http://blog.jim.com/culture/the-false-life-plan/
http://blog.jim.com/economics/the-future-belongs-to-those-that-show-up/
http://blog.jim.com/culture/fertility/
http://blog.jim.com/culture/on-what-used-to-be-called-marriage/
http://blog.jim.com/politics/the-reason-that-women-need-to-be-subordinated-for-successful-reproduction/

Note I am not a misogynist. Actually the reason women are not given more testosterone is because their eggs are more valuable than male sperm. We must protect the women, because if a tribe only had one woman remaining, it would be in danger of extinction, but one man could easily impregnate a plurality of woman.

I also dreamed at one point of working with female programmers and that a female would be both my career peer as well as my peer in romance. But I have since learned that there is a reason that women and men are physiologically different. Women have similar average IQ but their outliers are much more rare on the upper end of the IQ curve. Females are very smart at consensus building and nurturing. Men are very smart at economics (and technology as a function in economics).

http://blog.jim.com/culture/the-ancestral-environment-of-females/#comment-183149
http://blog.jim.com/culture/the-ancestral-environment-of-females/#comment-183156

As the 160 IQ Eric S. Raymond points out in numerous blogs, these are the "damned facts" that don't feel good to admit, but are in fact reality.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=5220
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=5238

Relate this phenomenon of wanting to ignore "damned facts" to following video:

https://www.prageru.com/courses/left-and-right-differences/does-it-feel-good-or-does-it-do-good-left-vs-right-2

Tangentially James A. Donald was the first person to interact with Satoshi Nakamoto when he announced Bitcoin in 2008 on the Cryptography mailing list.

---

Edit#2: the liberal socialism Dark Age proceeds as these brainless retards continue to foam at the mouth:

https://www.wired.com/2016/12/internet-week-99/

people need to learn the difference between social democracy and socialism.

capitalist countries with high taxes that make it difficult for (especially small) businesses to operate are not socialist. socialism is a system where workers have ownership of what they produce instead of most of it being taken away from them by a capitalist leaving them barely enough to survive on so that government steps in and subsidises them with food stamps and the like. you don't see negress welfare queens shitting out 10 kids from different men living off the government in cuba or the dprk

the welfare parasitism you're complaining about is a trait of social democracy not socialism and its more to do with vote buying than anything else, what happens is lazy minorities figure out they can do just as well on welfare as working so they vote to bring in more of their own kind which helps keep the political parties that pander to them in power. under a socialist system they would work or not eat.

Stop being delusional.
The only reason the USA is the strongest nation is because they put 1+ trillion $ a year in their defense budget while half of theiryour popuplation are living in shit - from eduaction to food, healthcare and social systems 

and one of the most funny things nowadays is that the US Army gets their recruits mainly from ex (black) gang members and the results in warfare are looking accordingly.

short:

USA sucks donkey balls - the land of freedom and democracy is long gone.

Exactly, socialism is idiotic in theory and even stupider in practice. Just because you and your friend both agree to take my Bitcoin, it does not make it morally acceptable. It's still theft.