Topic: [PND]Pandacoin | First Hybrid Wallet | 5000% Faster Blockchain Download | Instant Sync - page 191. (Read 1358974 times)
September 25, 2014, 10:55:15 PM
The coin needs solid buy support backing it if it's going to stay at this price.
September 25, 2014, 10:38:00 PM
Today is a good day for PND.
September 25, 2014, 10:31:43 PM
Now that PND is happening, we should try to work on a more fluid economy. maybe we can commission artworks for example. Perhaps the new website can have a marketplace type thing where people can trade goods and services for pnd, that or we start getting BambooRoad active again, and make it an official part of PND network.
Sounds intresting.
Look forward to hear more about that.
September 25, 2014, 10:24:07 PM
Now that PND is happening, we should try to work on a more fluid economy. maybe we can commission artworks for example. Perhaps the new website can have a marketplace type thing where people can trade goods and services for pnd, that or we start getting BambooRoad active again, and make it an official part of PND network.
September 25, 2014, 10:06:26 PM
need buy support! we want to secure this price 
where's whalepanda?
where's whalepanda?
Let em sleep
Price will not drop that much until he get 1higher and some weak hands can dump solong. September 25, 2014, 10:02:05 PM
#29 and over 1 million!
September 25, 2014, 09:57:12 PM
need buy support! we want to secure this price
where's whalepanda?
where's whalepanda?
September 25, 2014, 09:43:13 PM
MARKET CAP OVER 1 MILLION!!!
September 25, 2014, 09:37:58 PM
Pandacoin is awakening from its slumber - 44% gains, ranked 30th on coinmarketcap.com
When will we breach 1 million USD marketcap?
When will we breach 1 million USD marketcap?
That is when we were at 7 sat. Now that we're at 8 i'll VERY soon
September 25, 2014, 09:31:05 PM
Pandacoin is awakening from its slumber - 44% gains, ranked 30th on coinmarketcap.com
When will we breach 1 million USD marketcap?
When will we breach 1 million USD marketcap?
September 25, 2014, 08:18:29 PM
Gaining strong support on both BTC and LTC! Keep up the good work PND!
Bittrex will regret for not adding us yet.
Good for mintpal so far.
September 25, 2014, 08:15:54 PM
Remember to have buy support or else will just continue to have dumpers
September 25, 2014, 08:10:01 PM
wall on 6 sat is gone, we're going to 7 sat now!
September 25, 2014, 07:54:28 PM
Gaining strong support on both BTC and LTC! Keep up the good work PND!
Bittrex will regret for not adding us yet.
Good for mintpal so far.
September 25, 2014, 07:39:23 PM
Gaining strong support on both BTC and LTC! Keep up the good work PND!
September 25, 2014, 07:35:42 PM
I like that one also! 
September 25, 2014, 07:10:16 PM
Nice one barryzand
September 25, 2014, 07:08:43 PM
September 25, 2014, 04:37:23 PM
You're quite right, I was missing the point. Thank you for the correction!
September 25, 2014, 04:34:43 PM
The wallet is possessive. Why would it not be "It's" rather than "Its"?
I'm no English major, please explain why this is incorrect. Just trying to help.
On the news page you posted a link to, underneath the 2.1.2 wallet update where specifics are listed: Some suggestions.
ORIGINAL TEXT:
– Wallet no longer loses its staking status when doing an action that requires a full unlock, ‘unlock for staking’ is preserved across actions.
MY SUGGESTED TEXT:
– Wallet no longer loses it's staking status while doing an action that requires a full unlock, "unlock for staking" is preserved across actions.
No... I believe the original version here is the correct option.
lol. Bad grammar from a dude trying to fix grammar.
Haha yeah, most the fixes are just replacing ' with "
Which isn't necessarily any more right than the original. In fact if the entire thing is in quotes to begin with, it's straightforwardly wrong.
I agree, it wasn't meant to be perfect, just more clear. Really there shouldn't be any at all. I just left them because the original author used them, so I assumed they thought that it was a good choice in this case.
I'm no English major, please explain why this is incorrect. Just trying to help.
World’s First Cryptocurrency Designed for the Mainstream Mass Market
The Pandacoin (PND) Development Team is proud to reveal our first major update which highlights our intention of redefining the cryptocurrency landscape, by being the first cryptocurrency to design, develop and package specifically for the mainstream mass market. Pandacoin takes the first steps in building a solid foundation of how cryptocurrencies should be – easy to use, easy to buy, easy to mine and easy to understand.
Please have a look at our official announcement over on our new homepage's news section at the following link to check out our development releases, future plans and confirmed near future developments to look forward to! http://pandacoinpnd.org/news/
Cryptocurrency for the masses.
The Pandacoin Development Team
The Pandacoin (PND) Development Team is proud to reveal our first major update which highlights our intention of redefining the cryptocurrency landscape, by being the first cryptocurrency to design, develop and package specifically for the mainstream mass market. Pandacoin takes the first steps in building a solid foundation of how cryptocurrencies should be – easy to use, easy to buy, easy to mine and easy to understand.
Please have a look at our official announcement over on our new homepage's news section at the following link to check out our development releases, future plans and confirmed near future developments to look forward to! http://pandacoinpnd.org/news/
Cryptocurrency for the masses.
The Pandacoin Development Team
On the news page you posted a link to, underneath the 2.1.2 wallet update where specifics are listed: Some suggestions.
ORIGINAL TEXT:
– Wallet no longer loses its staking status when doing an action that requires a full unlock, ‘unlock for staking’ is preserved across actions.
MY SUGGESTED TEXT:
– Wallet no longer loses it's staking status while doing an action that requires a full unlock, "unlock for staking" is preserved across actions.
No... I believe the original version here is the correct option.
lol. Bad grammar from a dude trying to fix grammar.
Haha yeah, most the fixes are just replacing ' with "
Which isn't necessarily any more right than the original. In fact if the entire thing is in quotes to begin with, it's straightforwardly wrong.
I agree, it wasn't meant to be perfect, just more clear. Really there shouldn't be any at all. I just left them because the original author used them, so I assumed they thought that it was a good choice in this case.
"It's" is not possessive. "It's" = "It is". The possessive form of "its" is just "its".
Jump to: