Closing 4650- for more than 15m is a sell, 4800+ a buy.
Offering these for free as a Proof of Concept for the idiots challenging my service (f@ck them).
Topic: PnF TA - page 19. (Read 190664 times)
Long tail up:
Closing 4650- for more than 15m is a sell, 4800+ a buy.
Offering these for free as a Proof of Concept for the idiots challenging my service (f@ck them).
Closing 4650- for more than 15m is a sell, 4800+ a buy.
Offering these for free as a Proof of Concept for the idiots challenging my service (f@ck them).
Don't be an idiot like Roach, follow solid TA.
He is ignorant and dangerous, everyone should ignore him.
This is the moment when you sell all your BTC and buy back at 700$ or 470-520$ area.
+1
PS. 470$ - 520$ is for buy and hold. I'll try to catch the falling knife around 570$, should then retrace up 60%.
This is the moment when you sell all your BTC and buy back at 700$ or 470-520$ area.
Two people have PM'ed me this. They always expect AnonyMint to provide some analysis.
The issue seems to the be same as it was for Iota and Sergio's DAG design, which is that there is no way to prevent double-spends on multiple branches of the DAG. We covered this in great detail at the linked thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13830403
Iota "solves" this by hoping that all payers and payees run a Monte Carlo algorithm, but the only way to enforce it is to have centralized servers, which is what Iota has at launch.
You I suppose propose to incentivize one longest chain in another way, but game theory will always remain that without proof-of-work blocks then there is no Nash equilibrium resolving to one longest chain rule.
Sorry DAGs don't work. But I am not screaming to tell people not to invest in Iota, because frankly Satoshi's proof-of-work block chain centralizes as well, as is clearly on display.
You may want to quote this post before it is nuked by Hitler.
Another scam bites the dust! The issue seems to the be same as it was for Iota and Sergio's DAG design, which is that there is no way to prevent double-spends on multiple branches of the DAG. We covered this in great detail at the linked thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13830403
Iota "solves" this by hoping that all payers and payees run a Monte Carlo algorithm, but the only way to enforce it is to have centralized servers, which is what Iota has at launch.
You I suppose propose to incentivize one longest chain in another way, but game theory will always remain that without proof-of-work blocks then there is no Nash equilibrium resolving to one longest chain rule.
Sorry DAGs don't work. But I am not screaming to tell people not to invest in Iota, because frankly Satoshi's proof-of-work block chain centralizes as well, as is clearly on display.
You may want to quote this post before it is nuked by Hitler.
Can't wait for the crap code CfB has done in IOTA to crash when live and short this shit at Polo to the ground!
Max leverage, such profit!
I don't usually look at fundamentals, but if CfB has done the code....
EDIT: A taste of how poor a priori design (solid fundamentals, design & academia level research) NXT had:
Max leverage, such profit!
I don't usually look at fundamentals, but if CfB has done the code....
EDIT: A taste of how poor a priori design (solid fundamentals, design & academia level research) NXT had:
After watching the video you will probably ask how NXT solved the issue of "only accounts with low balance being online" and so "blocks taking forever to confirm". They simply solved it with a fixed threshold: If a block needs longer than 3600 seconds than anyone can mine it. 
Quoting from: https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/nxt/src/aca4d28fe6bdaa5837ee29739d36d311951c80ed/src/java/nxt/Generator.java?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#Generator.java-225
I really think that exponential mining is superior to this.
CLICK TO WATCH!!
(Attention: this is explained very easy and without too much accuracy to sketch the problem. In fact, the slopes are equal in our approach for different account balances, every user has its own "graph" for each "block" and starts at a different pseudo-random "base point", ... but this would be too complex to differentiate in such a small video. Anyway, I hope this video makes even the novice users clear why the linear POS functions in todays coins suck.)
Quoting from: https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/nxt/src/aca4d28fe6bdaa5837ee29739d36d311951c80ed/src/java/nxt/Generator.java?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#Generator.java-225
Code:
return hit.compareTo(target) < 0
&& (previousBlock.getHeight() < Constants.TRANSPARENT_FORGING_BLOCK_8
|| hit.compareTo(prevTarget) >= 0
|| (Constants.isTestnet ? elapsedTime > 300 : elapsedTime > 3600)
I really think that exponential mining is superior to this.
CLICK TO WATCH!!
(Attention: this is explained very easy and without too much accuracy to sketch the problem. In fact, the slopes are equal in our approach for different account balances, every user has its own "graph" for each "block" and starts at a different pseudo-random "base point", ... but this would be too complex to differentiate in such a small video. Anyway, I hope this video makes even the novice users clear why the linear POS functions in todays coins suck.)
Is anyone interested in OTC Futures/Options for hedging in ICOs (eg WAVES, Elastic, IOTA etc)?
IMHO shitcoins like IOTA should be easy to short them down to zero!
Feedback appreciated!
IMHO shitcoins like IOTA should be easy to short them down to zero!
Feedback appreciated!
Beta chart tool interface:
The dump happened, let's see if the bears can push past 565 towards 540!
i'd say there is room for 650ish.
but then retracement is more than likely just to purge and make the pump more sustainable.
Of course, long term investors can still hold, this is a short to medium term approach.
a-greeeed
i'd say there is room for 650ish.
but then retracement is more than likely just to purge and make the pump more sustainable.
Of course, long term investors can still hold, this is a short to medium term approach.
i'd say there is room for 650ish.
but then retracement is more than likely just to purge and make the pump more sustainable.
Just wanna give a big thank you to klee! Great service and great calls! Would definitely recommend. Also, thanks for getting me to unload my liska bags at 0008 
you think it will bounce back tonight klee, or keep dropping?
I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Bounce. Retest up to 3725 probably and fall at 3600.I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Then no idea.
This is a trade that was provided for free so you have no excuse for not having to pay my fees!
The pump was a bit stronger but a correction is very probable now.
you think it will bounce back tonight klee, or keep dropping?
I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Bounce. Retest up to 3725 probably and fall at 3600.I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Then no idea.
This is a trade that was provided for free so you have no excuse for not having to pay my fees!
you think it will bounce back tonight klee, or keep dropping?
I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Bounce. Retest up to 3725 probably and fall at 3600.I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Then no idea.
This is a trade that was provided for free so you have no excuse for not having to pay my fees!
you think it will bounce back tonight klee, or keep dropping?
I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Bounce. Retest up to 3725 probably and fall at 3600.I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Then no idea.
you think it will bounce back tonight klee, or keep dropping?
I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
I'm on the edge of my seat all day here
Jump to: