Poker requires a lot of skills and strategies before a player wins. Dice is easy to understand and you can just rely on luck and a little strategy (like the martingale).
a losing strategy if you ask me, but to each their own I guess.
It depends on the reason your playing the game, if your looking for a strategy based game, you'll hate dice and love poker, but if you just want to play for fun, easy and enjoy the ups and downs than, you will like dice. If choose one, I will choose dice because it's easy.
Ever dice would not be in my option because we may see the lose more than winnings in dice gambling. I would like to do betting or poker room games to use the strategy and gathered information to use and win continuously but we cannot do that in dice game. If you avoid dice even you will also consider gambling is one type profitable earning method in btc.
it's possible to lose out on any game in gambling, don't know why you would say otherwise. it's also not entirely likely you'll get strings of wins I poker either; it still boils down to being a game of chance, no amount of skill can change the cards you're dealt. conversely, it's also possible to get strings of wins in dice, it's just that you have very little control over that besides your odds / multiplier.
Martingale again, he will need to play and lose more of his money before he figure it out. After so many threads about it, and so many stories about lost money with martingale strategy some people still think that they can make money using it.
Winning and losing are part of the any game, you need to count your loses and expect good wining hand after. I like to play poker more then other games, in poker you play against other people and its more interesting then other games. You need to follow other players and their cards, your cards, you can win with bluff, or you can be strong and others to fold, you need to know how to take more money with luring other players to pay, books are written about poker and how to play it.
It is unfortunate but some people are only going to learn once they get burned and even then, there are people that after losing at a casino game using martingale think that something can change if they have a bigger bankroll or if they play in another casino.
the thing is though, some of these people never learn. they will never accept the fact that their loss is a statistical probability, and continue to dwell in the mindset that this 'amazing new setting' will never fail or something. of course, these are probably the same people you see on the forum spamming scam accusations against casinos that they 'rig their rolls' or something anyways.
POKER
Dice is a suckers game, however, for those with extremely large bankrolls (like the owners of other dice sites), it could generate small profits at high risk. Poker is the game to play if you want to reduce the risk to your bankroll ---> You have far greater control of your risk to reward ratio when you are presented with more information from which you can make more profitable decisions.
not really, for the most part, the potential to profit is mostly proportional to the risk involved, save for the effect of the house edge. it's only perceived the way you describe it because people are stupid and continue to play and, eventually, lose. poker does not however, as you put it, reduce the risk at all, it's still a game of fair chance. the only control you have over the game is how you play in order to deceive and read the other players at the table to gain a higher chance to win the hand.