Topic: Politics and interest (Read 260 times)

Politics and interest


If you place your money in a bank savings account, you won't get very much interest on it. How much interest will you get if you place your money in politics?

There are still some genuine leaders in some countries who don't take anything from the two countries involved in the war than to ensure peace reign in the two parties that engaged in the war, but I know there are some leaders using it to achieve money or influence from the countries involved by supporting the country that will give them those things when the war is over.

We have seen many wars that happened in the past and, the ones that is happening now in different countries with blood shares on the time because the right people that suppose end the war has turned it to their political interest that will expose them after the war.

War! The media today has been part of the factions that fuels and incite some of the wars we having in recent times. T he manner at which the paint stories that makes the news about issues concerning two factions at war its enough to exacerbate issues. some news we get from the media if we do our own personal digging about the real stories as it happened we won't be taking up arms and exchanging attacking words on each other. The media today breaks the news as it suits them to the attraction of  sympathy to their favoured side in the warring factions.

Every nation is fighting for power and to head the world, that's why many nation play deep politics that affect even their citizens without caring. You see when ever a conflict have allot of interest is very hard to resolve easily unless those interested is settled. Hamas and isreal war has allot of interest behind, which the UN and other bodies can't jump into quickly without subduing those interest, also note that when conflict has reached the stage of confrontation it can't be resolved easily because many interest will be involved. In many contexts there are groups or actors who may seek or foster violent conflict and benefit from it ,for example, to weaken a neighbouring region, generate or sustain business opportunities, or reinforce political narratives and authority. Peace building or intervention  to take place, it involves calling out and challenging such groups and actors and trying to limit their capacity to foment violent conflict or gain from it, either by aiding support to them that where  attacked.

Yea, war has been politicized right from the beginning but looking at what is happening between Rusia and Ukraine is about interest in reality, and most developed countries are playing politics about it if not this war would have ended,  the way am seeing this war it won't just go just like that because many interest group are now involved and are ready to support any of the side because one selfish reasons or the other, for peace to reign in both country, the two has to understand themselves and come to an agreement to settle whatever rift they are having if not the intended beneficiaries of this war will continue to fuel it indirectly. 

Politics is like an addiction, the more you get involved in this the more it will attract you. politics is making people polarized. I usually do not discuss politics with any of my friends or colleagues because, to me, it is a waste of time if the discussion is not productive.
No country is neutral. Technically, either they are against war or in favour of war, there is no third option. UN cannot do anything except pass a resolution.
I think peace is not in everyone's favour, most global powers are just playing geopolitics on war. Capitalists and industrialists are running the world and war means business, so why do they try to stop a war if they are making money from it?

Politics is a bloody game and anyone that is going into it must be ready to take the result and get prepared for the worse.
Anyone going into politics need to understand how nobody the game his. Politics is majorly full of people that are mean and ready to do anything for them to get the seat. We need to be ready and take the outcome of what we see in politics.

The UN doesn't have any authority except the authority that nations voluntarily give it. Faith in the UN is a religion.

Another religion is politics, just like addictive video games can be.

The only religion that can save anyone is the religion that brings about a close, personal relationship with Jesus, the Christ.

Politics does not pique the interest of everyone because it is a con. When it comes time for them to run for anything, whether president or any other position, they will be aware of their people's feelings, but once they vote and win, they will quickly forget about those who doubted them.
Despite the fact that there is plenty of money in politics, even individuals who have resigned from government service now devote practically all of their time to politics.

The truth is, the politics that is displayed to the public is very much different from the real issues. This people just let us think what we think while they are having a shadow party.

In the war between Israeli and Palestine the UN isn't neutral because they benefit from the wars that happens around the world. The world power and most countries produces weapons that good for wars and this is where there economy lays so in order for their business to grow the side with a country in order to sell their products to them hence increasing the war.

Politics is one of the things that controls the world and there is nothing we can do about it. The war between Russia and Ukraine is being politicalized and I think the Russia federation do not even care about it if not the war would have ended many months before now.
The war between the Israel and Palestine is also politicalized by the Iran to wage war against the Israel but looking at things now, I don't think the war is going to end naturally looking at so many backups from different country supporting each others.

So many people are now interested in politics but they don't understand the demands that comes through such, or maybe we should assume that they were only interested in politics because they realized it's one of the ways they could earn enough money for themselves and use for their own benefits, if there's interest, then there must be passion as well for it, this is what can make politics as a complete career for those that will be interested in it, politics is a call to serve.

Firstly you cannot separate politics and interest, it's always about what's in it for me, so most times the mediating party is also concerned about how they'll benefit materially or influencial. In my country i always experience politicians of different political parties come on air to abuse them selves, you'd feel like the two politicians will be sworn enemies for life, but you'd be very surprised that one day if their interests aligns, perhaps one of them decamps to the opposition party or there's a common loot to share, they'd shamelessly become best friends, smiling and hugging on national tv. So I think that there's not much differences when it comes to the national levels, I believe that nations will support a fellow country in conflict with another, based on their interest in their supporting country.

Yeah, it's like this big tangled web when it comes to global conflicts. Once a major player like the U.S. jumps in, you can bet it's not just gonna be just fine. Their actions have this domino effect, pulling in allies like NATO and stretching the whole thing to last way longer than it probably would've otherwise. It's like a game of shifting interests, where one move in one region affects what's happening on the other side of the planet. Understanding all these twists and turns is key to seeing why international conflicts can drag on and on.

Maybe it's high time we begin to ask people if what they are fighting for is the interest of the people or for their own self, politics is a call to serve the nation, contribute to nation's building and also engage in many humanitarian affairs that could add to the growth and development of the people, we are to put in first the interest of the people even before ours, but how many are able or ready to face the reality in politics.

For a country to go into war, it is already something of interest for both then you have other countries interest and blocs, so this is what escalates the fight that would have ended earlier to prolong. Despite the divide that we looking at the war from, I believe it would have been long gone if US was not interested in it and now that they are, it means the interest will spread to NATO countries and shifting to Asian countries.

Although the United Nations has tried to promote peace and provide humanitarian aid to those affected by the conflict, it has been challenged by some neutrals, who believe it has failed to hold some parties accountable for their actions. The situation in Gaza is dire and the UN and other international organizations must do more to protect civilians caught in the crossfire. The United Nations and its refugee agency must intensify their efforts to provide aid and protection to vulnerable residents of Gaza. It is imperative that all parties to the conflict comply with international humanitarian law and take all necessary measures to prevent harm to innocent civilians. The world cannot stand idly by while the people of Gaza suffer this devastating violence. Immediate steps are needed to end the crisis and bring lasting peace to the region.

Unfortunately, US have not told Benjamin Netanyahu to seize fire perhaps that is what will begin the seize fire. Yesterday, United States Secretary of State, Antony Blinken didn't drop any of such words rather to sympathize with the people killed, families injured and refugees. He more or less supported isreal chase for where the Gaza weapons are which is the reason Israel kept bumping civilian hide outs including hospitals, schools, ambulance etc. From the look of things, a seize fire is not around the corner for now except something changed.

Thanks for your nice question. My point is that the UN will be neutral. How is the UN controlling who controls who They are the ones who are controlling, directly or indirectly involved in the war, one side is helping the other side in various ways, in fact, no one is actually doing the war support, everyone is working for their own interests.The United Nations is the scapegoat number three here because the United Nations does not have enough power to resolve the war with, because if the five permanent powers come up with a two-part cease-fire proposal, the other A party vetoing it would effectively disqualify Palestine and Israel The conflict between the Western world and Russia must first be discussed without stopping and they must hold peaceful talks to prevent their hegemony, then war will automatically break will close automatically Here thousands of civilians are dying children are being killed no one is looking at the humanitarian side everyone is busy with how to prolong the war here media or other What will the institutions do because everything is under their control here USA is directly participating Russia is also indirectly helping them how will they stop the war and UN will take action how to take action now The rest of the world should come together to recast the UN Security Council and the Governing Council and arrange for the new members to adopt a permanent path, or else a permanent five If the system should be canceled then it will be easier to solve the problem by forcing the two countries to sit together and fulfill the law. Moreover, the UN has nothing to do now. One thing is to support the American side Apart from appeasing the Palestinian side in the name of humanitarian aid, they are doing nothing and cannot do anything else, what should be done by Palestine and Israel through negotiations.

Most countries in the UN actually have voted for a ceasefire politics is complicated it might be devastating to reduce a war that’s been taking lives day after day to politics but this is what this is some countries don’t care who initiated it first or who’s in the right/wrong at the end of the day a country will support a country they’ve formed alliances with because there’s something they can gain from it