Topic: Politics without political parties. - page 2. (Read 221 times)
I think that it depends on the type of political structure in a country, but in the modern politics, where democracy is practiced, political parties are important, where the opposition will be checkmating the excesses of the ruling party. I think that one party system will not eradicate corruption and bad leadership, because politicians will still form cliques in the one party system, so despite the system of governance that a country adopts, what matters to the masses is good leadership. One party system can breed dictatorship, where there'll be no external forces outside the party that'll call them to order if they're not doing the right thing.
Politics is a game of interest which is not just about governance but of factions such as the politics party differences.
Anyone that's not listed in any of the functioning political parties in a society is not accepted to be a political instead you're just one of the floor masses to abide to the governance of the governments.
Even those of the political followers are being attached to any of their interesting parties. I hope we don't get this complicated that it's just a party or factions which in every contexts of competitions there'd always be that individual interests to support their candidates as a group or sections. Apparently that's also said to be party differences.
So the essence of a political parties is to set maximum and acceptable competitions among the parties for the masses to rate them different via their governing system of which party has the best leadership.
So anyone who's expected to be the people's choice as you may say Op, he's also privileged to embrace a party and if yeah truly he's the peoples choice of course he'd be considered to be voted in.
Anyone that's not listed in any of the functioning political parties in a society is not accepted to be a political instead you're just one of the floor masses to abide to the governance of the governments.
Even those of the political followers are being attached to any of their interesting parties. I hope we don't get this complicated that it's just a party or factions which in every contexts of competitions there'd always be that individual interests to support their candidates as a group or sections. Apparently that's also said to be party differences.
So the essence of a political parties is to set maximum and acceptable competitions among the parties for the masses to rate them different via their governing system of which party has the best leadership.
So anyone who's expected to be the people's choice as you may say Op, he's also privileged to embrace a party and if yeah truly he's the peoples choice of course he'd be considered to be voted in.
I agree political parties sometimes can end up being the source of much of the corruption which goes around unpunished in a country, as someone living in south America, I can assure you it is something common when there is no system of check and balances to keep those political parties and their leaders at bay.
Though, because of how western democracy works, it is very unlikely for us to continue to function only with a bunch of independents running the government, in the end of the day, people gather together according to their ideology and whether they have anything in common among themselves or not.
Even if there is no party to represent people in the left or the right, it would be just matter of time before those in power who started as independent candidates started to form qualitions and alliances.
Also, keep in mind in many European democracies, in order to form a government is required for the parliament to be held as a majority (defined by a party or alliance of parties) otherwise a government/administration cannot be formed...
Though, because of how western democracy works, it is very unlikely for us to continue to function only with a bunch of independents running the government, in the end of the day, people gather together according to their ideology and whether they have anything in common among themselves or not.
Even if there is no party to represent people in the left or the right, it would be just matter of time before those in power who started as independent candidates started to form qualitions and alliances.
Also, keep in mind in many European democracies, in order to form a government is required for the parliament to be held as a majority (defined by a party or alliance of parties) otherwise a government/administration cannot be formed...
It varies per country on what kind of politics and government they have. For some reasons, I'd agree about politics and having no political party is the best. Like everyone is from individual sectors that they're representing and whatever the economy is demanding, they might be the best leader at that time.
Monarchy is what you're describing and based on the long term effect of it, it seems good to those countries that have this type of government. But I'd love to hear it from an actual person living in those countries that have this form leadership. Because by the books, they look great but in actuality, I have no idea.
Monarchy is what you're describing and based on the long term effect of it, it seems good to those countries that have this type of government. But I'd love to hear it from an actual person living in those countries that have this form leadership. Because by the books, they look great but in actuality, I have no idea.
Politics without political parties functioning in a country will be the best.
When contesting for election The only people that are qualified to run are those forwarded by a political party as there candidate there by making it hard for the people's choice to run.
When a political party is functioning in a country and one among which is on power any other person that those not belong to there political party will be seen as an opposition, that is why you see position being given to people that are not qualified for such position all because they are in the same political party there by causing damage to countries economy.
When contesting for election The only people that are qualified to run are those forwarded by a political party as there candidate there by making it hard for the people's choice to run.
When a political party is functioning in a country and one among which is on power any other person that those not belong to there political party will be seen as an opposition, that is why you see position being given to people that are not qualified for such position all because they are in the same political party there by causing damage to countries economy.
Jump to: