...
Its not man made pandemic, not engineered to make massive killing world wide. Why any country, CHINA or USA would take risk of killing its own people.
Probably it is worth some people's time to step back and ask '
what is a country?' Is it the people? Or is it the resources? Who installs the management of the country?
I posit that 'the country' is more the resource/'debt' in most instances, and especially the U.S.. After 100 years of private central banking an enormous debt has accumulated.
So then, what is a '
threat to the country'. I posit that the biggest threat to most countries is their internal population. In a country such as the U.S. with no external enemies who are powerful enough to threaten it, the most likely 'failure' (to service the debt) would be due to actions of the population. Even if a nation's population is not a threat (thanks to, say, years of public education and fluoride) they still compete with the debtors for resources.
So then what is 'defense' of the country against 'threats'? What is the DOD actually defending? Why did the DOD funding to Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance to cook up, with help from China, the reason for a 'covid vaccine' exceed by an order of magnitude the pitiful few million contributed by Fausti/Collins'?
As for China, I think the CCP holds the all-time historic record for the most citizens killed. 60,000,000 or some such in the 'great leap forward' alone if memory serves.
I will again posit that there is no special difference between the U.S. and China. They are both a couple of tools clattering about in the international banker's toolbox.
---
Another thing that people need realize is that an 'effective' weapon is frequently NOT an exquisitely lethal one. Toe-popper mines for instance. Basil-II had it figured out a millennia ago when he had the vanquished Bulgar's eyeballs plucked out leaving every 50'th guy with one eye to lead the rest home. The Bulgar's never again posed a challenge or threat.
With the 2020 event, a dead person is not going to be willingly taking the gene therapy. The weapon developed was tuned for the task at hand. That doesn't mean it wasn't any good or that they 'failed' to do 'better'. The jury is still out on that one because it's hard to predict the future, and I continue to believe that we are only at the start of this thing.