You think Bitcoin's community is where it is today because of anarchists ideology ?
LOL i think not.. it's called greed.
In the beginning, it was because of anarchist ideology, and that was good. Now, bitcoin is essentially indeed over. It is just a token used in a greedy greater-fool game, and it may even turn in a centralized government thing to control people. So to me, if bitcoin is not dead, it is almost dead. Yes, it has a high gamblers market cap. That's always so with greater fool games. And this one can still last quite a while, and go very high, there are still loads of greater fools possible. But bitcoin is essentially dead, in the sense of a free alternative to fiat. It didn't get nowhere. 8 years, and I can still not go to the supermarket and pay my groceries with bitcoin ; I still do not get my salary in bitcoin. And the day I will (if ever), it will be worse than fiat, because it will be totally state-controlled. As of now, fiat has a better outlook than bitcoin. Apart for gamblers.
Why would anarchists be making a currency ?
Clearly to have no laws or regulation then right ?
Call the cops or join a class action law suit when Cryptsy or GOX stole your money ?
Of course not. That's part of the freedom game. Because if you care about your monetary freedom, you don't hold your stuff on a centralized thing, do you ? And if you get ripped off, that's perfectly normal, and it is a pity it doesn't happen more often. You have given away your coins, and you got an IOU on a strange web site in return. Of course at a certain point, the web site closes. Who wouldn't do that with people giving you their money in return for something you put up on a web site ? What was the core idea of bitcoin ? Trustlessness, right ? What else than applying trustlessness did these exchanges do ? They were in the core activity of bitcoin. Why do you think that there are moderator multi-sig wallets on openbazaar ? Cryptsy and GOX were simply gambler's houses. And that's about all that's left of bitcoin. Gamblers' stuff and greater-fool stuff. "investment" and "ROI" on a currency. I'm always amazed that people complain about exchanges "scamming" them. Hell, what did they do ? Did they, or didn't they, use their private key to do a transaction ? Once that's done, they don't OWN their coins any more, right. That was the basic principle: ownership is knowledge of the private key. If you have transacted your coins, you don't own them any more. It is not because you can log on to a website that tells you that "you have 20 bitcoin in your account" that you own them: you don't have the key. You simply have something that a strange web site is telling you. *if you believe that*, that's your affair. In true trustless systems, you shouldn't believe anything. If things don't turn out as you believed, that's perfectly normal, and the basis of trustlessness, no ? So why complaining about something that puts the basic principle at work ? If the majority of bitcoin users complain about the application of the core principle of bitcoin, namely that ownership comes with knowledge of a secret key, and wants centralized justice to take care of that, then I call bitcoin dead. What's left is zombiecoin, a kind of fake fiat stuff looked after by the People's Bank of China.
If you can go crying at the police and at centralized justice, why on earth would you need a thing that implements, with a lot of waste heat, "trustlessness" ? Fiat works better in that case.
Bitcoin's "community" wants centralized justice so that their mutual rip-off game is "fair" and in doing so, it killed bitcoin. And the rest of crypto.
Without trustlessness, which is the basis of anarchy, crypto has no sense. This is like implementing digital signatures that are verified by a notary. If a notary has to verify it, there's no need for digital signatures. If there's a need for centralized regulation on bookkeeping, there's no need for trustless protocols. In the first case, you can do it with a paper contract. In the second case, you can do it with fiat and controlled banks. That's why bitcoin is dead. Even though its market cap can still increase orders of magnitude. There's no point.