Pages:
Author

Topic: [Poll] How many stakeholders should CommunityCoin have? (Read 2866 times)

newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
I guess the best would be about 500 -1000 stakeholders.
In my op this is the right number to build up a stable coin.
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 100
No one here to participate in the discussion.
No new content out?
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
0

no premine
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Very useful guide. Grin
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I think the coin to distribute as more many people. No need to make a private club. Cryptocoin idea is just that the coin is not dependent on a limited number of people. Also, where is the guarantee that those who will get a million coins will not be easy Troll. They have a lot of messages, they are active, but it does not mean that they can just put useful. They can just put our idea when there will be an advantageous offer. Because I am convinced that you need to give a coin to everyone who has an bitcointalk account with the age of 1 month.
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
500 seems sensible to me to try and get distribution done by the end of April.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
If there were people who were very close to meet the rules, could they get a smaller amount, like 500k or 250k? Just a thought, if it is difficult to find 1000. I just think that we should have more stake holders than 500.

Any more than 500 will take so long that people will lose interest.

If people start losing interest the coin will slowly die. 500 stakeholders is best for COMM.
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 100
English is not very good, there is no hope to get comm. Grin Grin
sr. member
Activity: 539
Merit: 250
i voted for 500 stakeholders.  there is not enough accounts right now. i think we should move on and get the coins distributed fairly as soon as possilbe. Maybe increasing the coins in every stakeholders is a fair way.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If there were people who were very close to meet the rules, could they get a smaller amount, like 500k or 250k? Just a thought, if it is difficult to find 1000. I just think that we should have more stake holders than 500.

NO
WE WANT TO KEEP COINS FOR BOUNTY'S AND DEVELOPMENT.
hero member
Activity: 814
Merit: 1000
If there were people who were very close to meet the rules, could they get a smaller amount, like 500k or 250k? Just a thought, if it is difficult to find 1000. I just think that we should have more stake holders than 500.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
You know, Nxt had like a 70 early adopters or something like that.
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
I voted for between 500 and 1000. If I recall correctly, there's already about 500 stakeholders as of now - so 500-1000 gives the dev the flexibility to make a judgment call on ending the distro. As guided by input from the Community, of course.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
Any more than 500 will take so long that people will lose interest.

If people start losing interest the coin will slowly die. 500 stakeholders is best for COMM.
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 263
Hey guys, what's happened to the community post? I'm not able to reply or quote... And you?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-communitycoin-comm-fair-free-distribution-pure-pos-wallet-updated-529481
legendary
Activity: 1229
Merit: 1001
I voted for 1000 it really should be 10,000 but it's hard to distribute to that many people and not get people getting in on it 10+ times
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1009
Add a new poll for vote the development fund fraction.
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
500 sounds about right to me. That gives more people a chance to apply but still allows the full distribution in a reasonable time.
Pages:
Jump to: