Best punishment would be to rename the BCX account to MicroCashMike.
KingRealScam would be a better fit lol
Topic: [POLL] Should BCX get banned (Read 3089 times)
KingRealScam would be a better fit lol
What happened to this forum having a policy to ban those who are shown to be here just for the purpose of trolling??
BCX, et al other aliases should have been banned a long, long time ago....
BCX, et al other aliases should have been banned a long, long time ago....
Best punishment would be to rename the BCX account to MicroCashMike.
Name them all DannyMaddox
BCX was on BTC-E chat a few days ago bragging about his 1337-p0w4rZ, and showed it off in the form of DDoSing Bitcointalk.
I'm sure there were many people on at the time that witnessed and can corroborate his bragging.
It was actually kind of sad and pathetic to watch.
EDIT: Just caught up on the other threads. I guess I missed the episodes of Bitcointalk where BCX went from insane SolidCoin hater, to someone who adopts a SolidCoin sock-puppet persona, and then decides to disrupt and cause trouble for LiteCoin. Jesus, what happened to that guy ? He go crazy or something ?
I'm sure there were many people on at the time that witnessed and can corroborate his bragging.
It was actually kind of sad and pathetic to watch.
EDIT: Just caught up on the other threads. I guess I missed the episodes of Bitcointalk where BCX went from insane SolidCoin hater, to someone who adopts a SolidCoin sock-puppet persona, and then decides to disrupt and cause trouble for LiteCoin. Jesus, what happened to that guy ? He go crazy or something ?
Best punishment would be to rename the BCX account to MicroCashMike.
Poll needs to be updated to include MicrocashMike and DannyMaddox accounts 
There also needs to be a "sockpuppet" tag.
Maybe force the following to be their avatar?
There also needs to be a "sockpuppet" tag.
Maybe force the following to be their avatar?
lol +1
Poll needs to be updated to include MicrocashMike and DannyMaddox accounts
There also needs to be a "sockpuppet" tag.
Maybe force the following to be their avatar?
There also needs to be a "sockpuppet" tag.
Maybe force the following to be their avatar?
Given recent developments, felt this needs a bump?
If he got a scammer tag, he would only try to turn it around as a badge of honor and brag about it. He's kind of slimy like that.
That would be fine by me, a scammer is a scammer and bitcoinexpress is a scammer. I wouldn't ban him, just mark him with the scammer xxxxxxx tag.
Like bitlane stated, we don't need any more personalities coming from IT.
If he got a scammer tag, he would only try to turn it around as a badge of honor and brag about it. I can picture it now "Bravely sacrificed his credibility for the benefit of everyone. We are all in his debt. "
He's kind of slimy like that.
He's kind of slimy like that.
I had deep thought of this, I think IT should walk among marked in shame with a scammer tag.
At the VERY least a scamer tag is warranted, I mean come on, how could you refer to him as any of the other tags?
I dont think i'd miss him, he gave NMC a lot of greif, probably profited from the drama, now does the same with LTC.
@Psy
Theymos looked at all that last week as well as determined I wasn't involved in any DDoS on the forum and more importantly there's no conclusive report that DDoS did take place. Please quit embarrassing yourself by simply repeating what others are saying.
As always, warm regards
~BCX~
Theymos looked at all that last week as well as determined I wasn't involved in any DDoS on the forum and more importantly there's no conclusive report that DDoS did take place. Please quit embarrassing yourself by simply repeating what others are saying.
As always, warm regards
~BCX~
No, he didn't determined anything. You simply denied the validity of the log because you're not man enough to stand by what you say and do. You're a coward, Mr. Maddox.
Now the log was confirmed as valid. You have 2 choices:
1- You admit on being a criminal
2- You admit on being a liar and a coward
Which is it?
@ BCX and PSY
I have confirmed that the logs that PSY posted are in fact genuine.
I also confirm the fact that when I was asked to watch a DDoS take place it did in fact happen. I tried to get to bitcointalk.org and could not while at the same time chatting with BCX in IRC.
At this point PSY and Realsolid/Coinhunter have more credibility than BCX IMHO.
Oh, and not forgetting. When pulling him up about the claim, you'll just get back a torrid of personal abuse as a distraction. 
Well, he did tell me that "I would shit myself if I knew who he REALLY was" ....so perhaps he IS Satoshi, along with the other 6 personalities.
Suppose he 'done a BCX' and didn't back the claim up with anything. Then quickly change the subject.
lol this is what he does...^
Well, he did tell me that "I would shit myself if I knew who he REALLY was" ....so perhaps he IS Satoshi, along with the other 6 personalities.
Suppose he 'done a BCX' and didn't back the claim up with anything. Then quickly change the subject.
God, BCX might step up to the next level of BS claiming he's Satoshi next.
Well, he did tell me that "I would shit myself if I knew who he REALLY was" ....so perhaps he IS Satoshi, along with the other 6 personalities.
God, BCX might step up to the next level of BS claiming he's Satoshi next.
Jump to: