he is the creator of bitcoin pretending to be a Hoaxer/scammer 
exactly,so everybody can forget about him in a month,like remeber that guy Craig Wright,what a joke that guy is.
Topic: [POLL]! What is Craig Wright? - page 2. (Read 1716 times)
exactly,so everybody can forget about him in a month,like remeber that guy Craig Wright,what a joke that guy is.
I'm a little disappointment and angered at how naive you guys are being. This is a grown man flying around the world trying to convince people he is SN so he can be left alone. He presents no proof even tho it would take less then a minute to sign a message with his private key.
This guy reached most of the educational goals most of us could just dream about, but he has not made any real ground shaking difference. Sometimes people work hard and get no recognition or they accomplish educational goals but they do not get their 15 minutes of fame.
He might be seeking some attention or he might be looking for some excitement. ^hmmmm^
He might be seeking some attention or he might be looking for some excitement. ^hmmmm^
Total fraudster!
I'm still waiting to see his "Cryptographic Miracle".
I'm still waiting to see his "Cryptographic Miracle".
Up until this point, haven't seen a real evidence proving he is and everything seems to be shown in closed doors to whoever verified he is Satoshi. Just because some known media publish about it, doesn't mean his the one since medias don't have the technical knowledge to know a lot of things in regards to this and fooling them wouldn't be a hard thing so my vote goes for being a Hoaxer/scammer for not giving enough proof of who his trying to be, to the eyes of the public.
He is an Australian businessman staying in Sydney, and met Gavin in London... but maybe Gavin should go to Australia and not London....
publicly disclosed signature vs behind closed doors with media?
you decide.
you decide.
public disclosure so he can convince all for everyone has the right to know.
he is the creator of bitcoin pretending to be a Hoaxer/scammer
Due to lack of any real evidence, he is most likely a hoaxer who created an elaborate hoax to fool people.
If he shows real evidence, not fake one like he did now, then this skeptic burden will be lifted.
He has the burden of proof on him, especially after his latest shady attept to give fake evidence.
If he shows real evidence, not fake one like he did now, then this skeptic burden will be lifted.
He has the burden of proof on him, especially after his latest shady attept to give fake evidence.
If you were going to announce publicly yourself as the REAL Satoshi and have three major publications run stories corresponding to the release of your own blog post admitting this fact, why would you offer fake evidence at all? Why do you hold out any hope for real evidence, when he could have used real evidence up front and been done with it? This is a hoax/scam, end of story.
his claims doesn't fit the profile of a bitcoin creator (satoshi) someone who has created bitcoin and blockchain where everything on it is public and implemented the sign message part to prove ownership will not show proof of owning bitcoin address to only one person under a blanket 
publicly disclosed signature vs behind closed doors with media?
you decide.
you decide.
Surprised that anyone would answer anything but a scammer at this point. All of his claims from December on forward have been exposed as scams, the sole exception being Gavin & co's. thumbs-up based on a private screening under conditions controlled by Wright and his "associates." History is full of nominally intelligent people being hoodwinked under similar conditions. Given the track record, how can we possibly believe Wright is for real when simple proofs are available but he deliberately avoids offering them?
Due to lack of any real evidence, he is most likely a hoaxer who created an elaborate hoax to fool people.
If he shows real evidence, not fake one like he did now, then this skeptic burden will be lifted.
He has the burden of proof on him, especially after his latest shady attept to give fake evidence.
If he shows real evidence, not fake one like he did now, then this skeptic burden will be lifted.
He has the burden of proof on him, especially after his latest shady attept to give fake evidence.
Is Craig Wright a hoaxer/scammer or the Creator of bitcoin?
You can change your vote if you change your mind.
You can change your vote if you change your mind.
Jump to: