^
I am giving my best not to read timelord's posts as I have no clue what the hell he talks about, unfortunately, I can't ignore him when I am not logged in and reading forum. Let's just call it "another off topic timelord's rant".
Heey! I have an idea! Theymos should invent something like "ignore button for forum guests"!
Topic: [Poll]Timelord2067 ad hominem, trolling, fud, accusations, fake flags, lies NSFW (Read 1433 times)
October 17, 2020, 11:01:48 AM
October 16, 2020, 09:49:33 PM
The following is is off-topic on a thread that that I don’t want to keep bumping with Timelord’s nonsense.
What the hell is he even trying to say? I ask for somebody who is not Timelord to interpret this. Is he implying that my account was acquired as the alt of an alt account that I myself had acknowledged with bidirectional neutral feedbacks? Is he actually psychotic? Or is he just trolling?
Oh, yes, I just tagged him again for the reasons thereby referenced.
Where do I start:
You trust feedback abuse of me:
Or, that you in turn can't read:
Next you will tell me I can't spell colour.
What the hell is he even trying to say? I ask for somebody who is not Timelord to interpret this. Is he implying that my account was acquired as the alt of an alt account that I myself had acknowledged with bidirectional neutral feedbacks? Is he actually psychotic? Or is he just trolling?
Oh, yes, I just tagged him again for the reasons thereby referenced.
Are you able to read the bold title which says in large letters, “Trust summary for Trade Runner”, and bold subtitle which says, “Sent feedback”? I directly quoted from Trade Runner’s trust page, with a link thereto.
Your post, its title, and its insinuations are defamatory of me. Your sabre-rattling about “for future reference” is ridiculous, in the sense of inviting ridicule of you. Also, you do not know how to spell “misleading”.
I have tagged you accordingly.
Your post, its title, and its insinuations are defamatory of me. Your sabre-rattling about “for future reference” is ridiculous, in the sense of inviting ridicule of you. Also, you do not know how to spell “misleading”.
I have tagged you accordingly.
Where do I start:
You trust feedback abuse of me:
Quote
Or, that you in turn can't read:
Quote
Next you will tell me I can't spell colour.
October 08, 2020, 02:58:23 PM
~
Perhaps marlboroza should practice what they preach.
Ekhem...lets not forget your "neutral-feedback-bumps".Perhaps marlboroza should practice what they preach.
I know that you, timelord2067, can't remember things lately so little reminder for you to read few posts in this thread again. I promise I won't remove your post if you write something meaningful (no trolling/out of context/similar thingies).
August 02, 2020, 12:02:54 PM
You mean your first instinct after making an alt account isn't to quickly give it some merits so it can level up? Which sig campaign are you planning on entering it in eventually? Hope its not Chipmixer.
Damnit, you got me 
August 02, 2020, 11:24:42 AM
Well, Mr. Moron2067, it's not me.
You mean your first instinct after making an alt account isn't to quickly give it some merits so it can level up? Which sig campaign are you planning on entering it in eventually? Hope its not Chipmixer.
August 02, 2020, 10:51:04 AM
This guy is complete lunatic. It seems that I am not allowed to respond in topics started by fake newbie accounts, if I do, according to timelord, I am automatically their alt account:
Instead of replying off topic can you tell us on what trust and deals you added rohang to your trust list? Please give one example why rohang should be trusted and I'll never message on forum again.
Are you sure you know which alt you're using to make these idle threats that mean nothing from?
Well, Mr. Moron2067, it's not me.
(ARCHIVED --> http://archive.is/lJlUA#selection-9535.0-9907.95 <--)
Instead of replying off topic can you tell us on what trust and deals you added rohang to your trust list? Please give one example why rohang should be trusted and I'll never message on forum again.
Are you sure you know which alt you're using to make these idle threats that mean nothing from?
Well, Mr. Moron2067, it's not me.
(ARCHIVED --> http://archive.is/lJlUA#selection-9535.0-9907.95 <--)
May 17, 2020, 02:41:26 AM
^ obviously, timelord is always right.
I have recently sent counter to timelord and lauda and timelord created crazy theory. I have tried to explain him why I have sent that feedback, and, instead of reading, timelord went full retard so I gave up and I just told him that he is idiot and I linked my post. His last reaction was this(of course, once again timelord tried to hide something, in this case, link from my post):
The correct English usage is: "You Sir, are an idiot!"
Or, you can get away with:
"You are an idiot!" or the contracted: "You're an idiot!" (Note also the punctuation in the form of an exclamation mark).
In every case please note how you have omitted the word AN
Most important when you are trying to insult someone to get it right.
Your hostile reaction over the last few posts is proof positive that you haven't changed, you are still as hostile as ever and your glowing positive trust was only a method to attack mhanbostanci using myself as collateral damage.
I've moved on. I didn't say I'd forgiven, or forgotten. Just that I've moved on. Marlboroza is going to have to work out whatever daemons are burning him up on his own.
Now cry me a river.
I have recently sent counter to timelord and lauda and timelord created crazy theory. I have tried to explain him why I have sent that feedback, and, instead of reading, timelord went full retard so I gave up and I just told him that he is idiot and I linked my post. His last reaction was this(of course, once again timelord tried to hide something, in this case, link from my post):
Nice deflection. Now cry me a river.
You are idiot.The correct English usage is: "You Sir, are an idiot!"
Or, you can get away with:
"You are an idiot!" or the contracted: "You're an idiot!" (Note also the punctuation in the form of an exclamation mark).
In every case please note how you have omitted the word AN
Most important when you are trying to insult someone to get it right.
Your hostile reaction over the last few posts is proof positive that you haven't changed, you are still as hostile as ever and your glowing positive trust was only a method to attack mhanbostanci using myself as collateral damage.
I've moved on. I didn't say I'd forgiven, or forgotten. Just that I've moved on. Marlboroza is going to have to work out whatever daemons are burning him up on his own.
Now cry me a river.
May 15, 2020, 04:39:08 AM
From the ChipMixer sig campaign thread:
To be fair, Bit_Happy didn't say that the compliment was in the form of trust feedback. It would be quite weird to use the trust system to compliment someone on posting quality.
Pardon?
Weird to complement, but ok to run them down?
suchmoon was just pointing out that Timelord was saying something that was incorrect, and of course Timelord's response is to troll them with stupidity. Not really upping his chances of getting accepted to the campaign.
A few weeks ago I realized that the first interaction I ever had with Timelord was when I was trying to tell him that Bruno wasn't the same person as cryptohunter, even though his trust feedback for cryptohunter (still) reads:
Like his most recent engagements with me, his reaction at the time was to be a hostile dick.
Something that Timelord is incapable of saying:
You might have given them *three* positives, but they haven't given you anything.
To be fair, Bit_Happy didn't say that the compliment was in the form of trust feedback. It would be quite weird to use the trust system to compliment someone on posting quality.
Pardon?
Weird to complement, but ok to run them down?
Really?
...suchmoon was just pointing out that Timelord was saying something that was incorrect, and of course Timelord's response is to troll them with stupidity. Not really upping his chances of getting accepted to the campaign.
A few weeks ago I realized that the first interaction I ever had with Timelord was when I was trying to tell him that Bruno wasn't the same person as cryptohunter, even though his trust feedback for cryptohunter (still) reads:
Like his most recent engagements with me, his reaction at the time was to be a hostile dick.
Something that Timelord is incapable of saying:
Quote from: notTimelord
Oh, you're right. My bad, or let me fix that.
April 20, 2020, 03:44:19 PM
(that's sarcasm, you fucks)
You wish. Timelord2067 will use this as a red trust reference, and I'm sure TECSHARE will find ways to be a humorless prick about it too.
"Reference: bitcoin forum -> Nutildah can't stay on topic (archive, web archive, archive of web archive)"
April 20, 2020, 10:54:29 AM
(that's sarcasm, you fucks)
You wish. Timelord2067 will use this as a red trust reference, and I'm sure TECSHARE will find ways to be a humorless prick about it too.
April 20, 2020, 10:06:53 AM
I was thinking about something and I thought timelord was joking in howeycoins topic but I am really not sure any more. I think he really investigated it!
edit: here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41736089
edit: here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41736089
Holy fuck, that is hilarious. Thanks for sharing.
I apologize for going severely OT, but I wonder what ever happened to MagicSmoker. He was an up-and-comer, and I remember him fondly because he nominated me as one of Bitcointalk's most entertaining personalities.
Timelord2067 clearly doesn't get what is special about HoweyCoins - just look at how quickly it has garnered >39 pages of positive posts, mainly from that stalwart supporter of so many projects here on btct, Haiku Bot®. So the Fry you really want is:
Maybe he quit because his Activity reached 420?
Speaking of that, my account is officially 6 years old today! I say "my account" because as we all know I bought it from the real nutildah in 2016, who was kind of a jerkoff. I'm so much better than that guy.
(that's sarcasm, you fucks)
April 19, 2020, 02:34:47 PM
I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.
Oh there are so many choices:
1) A few marbles short of a full deck.
2) Not the brightest knife in the chandelier.
3) As sharp as a bag of wet hammers.
4) All of the above.
edit: here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41736089
He is either become sick throughout the years which would be very unfortunate, or he was always actually quite morally evil and has only recently shown his true face. You can choose which version you wish to believe.
...this investigation happened 2 years ago, maybe he was always like this and eventually he showed his true face? April 17, 2020, 02:46:42 PM
I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.
Oh there are so many choices:
1) A few marbles short of a full deck.
2) Not the brightest knife in the chandelier.
3) As sharp as a bag of wet hammers.
4) All of the above.
April 17, 2020, 12:42:52 PM
He is either become sick throughout the years which would be very unfortunate, or he was always actually quite morally evil and has only recently shown his true face. You can choose which version you wish to believe.
I have no clue what happened to Timelord. For example, Nutildah said he is in contact with Bruno's family. Timelord said this:
Irony:
You want us to take your word that you've spoken to Bruno's family, but tell us not to believe another user who makes the same claim.
I knew Bruno personally and have been in contact with a family member.
You want us to take your word that you've spoken to Bruno's family, but tell us not to believe another user who makes the same claim.
Nutildah said: "YES"
And Timelord said:
Yes.
Thank-you for voting "yes" to the Poll topic.
Next.
I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.
April 17, 2020, 11:46:39 AM
His major concern is about me not following some edited rules instead of tagging scammer and supporting that flags.
It is just disgusting.
He is either become sick throughout the years which would be very unfortunate, or he was always actually quite morally evil and has only recently shown his true face. You can choose which version you wish to believe. It is just disgusting.
April 12, 2020, 02:27:09 PM
If you want to make a local rule, it needs to be in an unedited OP. So I will post here all I like and you can suck my dick. Have fun deleting all the valid criticism you like, because like I said, you have no argument, so that is all you have left.
I know you don't read the deleted post notification PMs but you might want to start doing that unless you enjoy embarrassing yourself.
April 12, 2020, 01:28:23 PM
Notice how the non-DT1 troll is repeating the $5-$6 rate over and over again but completely ignores all other pertinent rules. Posts shorter than 100 characters are not paid. Deleted posts are not paid. Self-mod deleted posts don't lower any "ratio" that I can see.
This is timelord's way to say that he doesn't have good argument(as usual). I found very amusing when he mention someone's nick and then he accuse them of stalking. Or when he mention someone's nick and then he complains why they replied
@TECSHARE, you are not allowed to post here any more.
April 11, 2020, 09:59:42 PM
LOL at Timelord's selective comprehension AKA blatant lying:
Notice how the non-DT1 troll is repeating the $5-$6 rate over and over again but completely ignores all other pertinent rules. Posts shorter than 100 characters are not paid. Deleted posts are not paid. Self-mod deleted posts don't lower any "ratio" that I can see.
Notice how the DT1 Troll is repeating his post over and over again. Getting $5 - $6 per post and then rinse and repeating? OP You should (if I can be so bold as to make a suggestion) delete these posts as soon as they appear - it'll lower his post to deleted ratio. It might make him think twice before trolling this thread.
happy to get paid $5-$6 per post
instant gratification you get knowing you'll be paid $5-$6 per post
Notice how the non-DT1 troll is repeating the $5-$6 rate over and over again but completely ignores all other pertinent rules. Posts shorter than 100 characters are not paid. Deleted posts are not paid. Self-mod deleted posts don't lower any "ratio" that I can see.
April 09, 2020, 03:54:57 PM
I just had to "unignore" one troll account to see what timelord2067 merited, and I was really surprised to see this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54188671
This is your long-term so called "scam buster" and alt account investigator:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54103332
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54105312
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54167617
Person who will close their eyes and ignore everything if they get signature payment from ICO bump account. Except because of money, I figured out why he is also doing this, he is doing this out of spit, just because he doesn't like someone (or doesn't like someone any more).
And, I just figured that he did some crazy shit here, instead of clicking exactly 4 links and doing his usual thingy, what timelord did? This:
Perhaps it would be better if you refreshed your knowledge of how to submit an investigation by perusing the OP including the section on archiving any proof.
His major concern is about me not following some edited rules instead of tagging scammer and supporting that flags.
It is just disgusting.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54188671
This is your long-term so called "scam buster" and alt account investigator:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54103332
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54105312
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54167617
Person who will close their eyes and ignore everything if they get signature payment from ICO bump account. Except because of money, I figured out why he is also doing this, he is doing this out of spit, just because he doesn't like someone (or doesn't like someone any more).
And, I just figured that he did some crazy shit here, instead of clicking exactly 4 links and doing his usual thingy, what timelord did? This:
...
Perhaps it would be better if you refreshed your knowledge of how to submit an investigation by perusing the OP including the section on archiving any proof.
His major concern is about me not following some edited rules instead of tagging scammer and supporting that flags.
It is just disgusting.
February 26, 2020, 11:59:42 PM
I have voted negative in this topic’s poll and tagged #131361 “Timelord2067” accordingly, with OP as my reference link.
Seems fair. I do not understand what happened to him and it makes it even worse when he makes statements such as this:Quote from: nullius
A formerly productive member of the community, who has degenerated into a crackpot with a chip on his shoulder. Randomly attacks others with bizarre accusations so nonsensical that they would be beneath notice, were they not haloed in a false credibility from the good forum work that he did years ago. As it is, a bright red warning is warranted: Distrust this user and *anything whatsoever* that he says or does.
(and he also removed one of the two negative trust feedbacks he'd previously left for me the same day he's telling others to ~Timelord2067 - Lauda is becoming increasingly confused about what he's saying and doing)
Something in your brain no longer ticks proper and I do not know what caused it. 
Jump to: