Topic: Pollution - page 5. (Read 1341 times)
Every work has side effects. Industrialisation isn't possible without pollution but we can check the level of it surely
Pollution the main sources of bacteria its came from the air being polluted by some smoke from cars,factories and cigarette smoking.There are many types of pollution Air pollution,Water pollution and etc.
Bacteria was here long before there were factories or cigarettes. If bacteria came from pollution, then it came from volcanic pollution, which is far greater than any pollution people can thing of doing outside of nukes. In addition, some bacteria is good for you. If the good bacteria in your gut died right now, you would only live for a few more minutes.
Pollution the main sources of bacteria its came from the air being polluted by some smoke from cars,factories and cigarette smoking.There are many types of pollution Air pollution,Water pollution and etc.
Pollution is a critical hazard to planet earth.Climate change, heat effects
and a whole lot of harmful occurrences are caused by pollution.Air pollution, water polution
and land pollution affect the entire ecosystem.Governments must channel a lot of resources in reclaiming
our only home-The earth.Scientist should make researches on how to neutralize chlorofluorocarbons.
Ozone depletion must be tackled either by putting laws and policies to curtail harmful emissions from
industries around the world.Environmental sanitation agencies must ensure society manage or recycle
biodegradable and non-biodegradable wastes to reduce pollution.
and a whole lot of harmful occurrences are caused by pollution.Air pollution, water polution
and land pollution affect the entire ecosystem.Governments must channel a lot of resources in reclaiming
our only home-The earth.Scientist should make researches on how to neutralize chlorofluorocarbons.
Ozone depletion must be tackled either by putting laws and policies to curtail harmful emissions from
industries around the world.Environmental sanitation agencies must ensure society manage or recycle
biodegradable and non-biodegradable wastes to reduce pollution.
Governments are the ones that are causing the pollution by using industry to make money. They aren't going to channel money into stopping industry, which is what it will take to stop pollution.
The thing that will stop pollution is no more taxes. Then industry will have to take over, and industry knows what to do better than governments. How does industry know? They know that if they kill off the people with pollution, they won't have anybody to buy their products.
Government is a middleman for industry. Get rid of government and taxes, and industry will ultimately clean up pollution.
Pollution is a critical hazard to planet earth.Climate change, heat effects
and a whole lot of harmful occurrences are caused by pollution.Air pollution, water polution
and land pollution affect the entire ecosystem.Governments must channel a lot of resources in reclaiming
our only home-The earth.Scientist should make researches on how to neutralize chlorofluorocarbons.
Ozone depletion must be tackled either by putting laws and policies to curtail harmful emissions from
industries around the world.Environmental sanitation agencies must ensure society manage or recycle
biodegradable and non-biodegradable wastes to reduce pollution.
and a whole lot of harmful occurrences are caused by pollution.Air pollution, water polution
and land pollution affect the entire ecosystem.Governments must channel a lot of resources in reclaiming
our only home-The earth.Scientist should make researches on how to neutralize chlorofluorocarbons.
Ozone depletion must be tackled either by putting laws and policies to curtail harmful emissions from
industries around the world.Environmental sanitation agencies must ensure society manage or recycle
biodegradable and non-biodegradable wastes to reduce pollution.
That is one of the most common problems of one country especially those country who is developed country.. The main reason why it happen because there are a lots of people who has no dicipline about themselves.. They are just thinking about their own goods only not knowing that what they are doing could affect a lots especially our environment... So we need to act now to save our mother earth...
Why do you care about saving "mother earth." I mean, you are going to die long before you have any real enjoyment out of "her." What's it to you?
Indeed you are right but the root of pollution is the over population and the continues improvement of technology which causes pollution.
First part of your post is right, but the second part is pure BS. No one is going to deny the fact that the root cause of pollution is over-population. But you are wrong when you say that improvement of technology further causes the worsening of the situation. IMO, it is just the opposite. Technology helps us to reduce the negative effects of pollution.
That's right. Hopefully, someday, technology will increase so much that we will see that nature does it best, and use technology to completely eliminate everything except nature.
That is one of the most common problems of one country especially those country who is developed country.. The main reason why it happen because there are a lots of people who has no dicipline about themselves.. They are just thinking about their own goods only not knowing that what they are doing could affect a lots especially our environment... So we need to act now to save our mother earth...
Indeed you are right but the root of pollution is the over population and the continues improvement of technology which causes pollution.
First part of your post is right, but the second part is pure BS. No one is going to deny the fact that the root cause of pollution is over-population. But you are wrong when you say that improvement of technology further causes the worsening of the situation. IMO, it is just the opposite. Technology helps us to reduce the negative effects of pollution.
Pollution is the destroyer of our earth it cause of climate change that we are suffering.
Indeed you are right but the root of pollution is the over population and the continues improvement of technology which causes pollution.
A long time before pollution came about, people died. They hacked each other to bits with swords when necessary.
What good is it to keep the earth alive if we don't have people to live in it? So, the real problem is people and their thinking. How are we going to eliminate wrong thinking from people? And since there is so much difference of opinion, how are we even going to determine what thinking is wrong?
Pollution is the destroyer of our earth it cause of climate change that we are suffering.
Indeed you are right but the root of pollution is the over population and the continues improvement of technology which causes pollution.
Dont we have enough air pollution already?
Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK
Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.
Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK
As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.
The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.
It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.
If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'
But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.
The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.
It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.
If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'
But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.
Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.
Yeah well that's the kind of argument you can hear from big oil producers :p.
Even them now are agreeing their product is f*** up the planet, only a maniac dumb dumb could deny it (yeay mr President of the USA)
So what's their solution : reduction of oil use ? no no no ...
Yeay lets go bioengineer our planet, we'll save humanity ... please
.From the Population thread:
One of the best ways is to spread nano-size aluminum and barium and strontium particles in the air, so that people breath them, penetrating into their reproductive organs, which will cause their children to become infertile.
Dont we have enough air pollution already?
Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK
Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.
Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK
As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.
The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.
It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.
If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'
But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.
The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.
It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.
If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'
But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.
Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.
Yeah well that's the kind of argument you can hear from big oil producers :p.
Even them now are agreeing their product is f*** up the planet, only a maniac dumb dumb could deny it (yeay mr President of the USA)
So what's their solution : reduction of oil use ? no no no ...
Yeay lets go bioengineer our planet, we'll save humanity ... please
. pollution mostly occur because fumes and a fire.
Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?
Pollution is becoming a major problem, but instead of bragging here and there, look up an think what YOU CAN DO to control/reduce it. Just Do your part.Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?
For Example, Spread awareness, Use electricity and Not engines (if you can afford), Control your garbage production, try to reduce your other fume discharges and many other methods.
If everyone thinks like this, it will have a major impact.
Don't we have enough air pollution already?
Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK
Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.
Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK
As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.
The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.
It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.
If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'
But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.
The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.
It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.
If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'
But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.
Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.
pollution mostly occur because fumes and a fire.
Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?
Pollution nowadays really becoming severe due to continious emission of monocarbon from vehicles. This issue cant be easily fixed because of the needs of people by means of transportation.Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?
The main culprits behind air pollution are thermal power-plants and industrial units. Vehicles also contribute in a significant way, but their proportion has been going down for the past many years.
One of the main reasons for the excessive pollution of the exhaust gases of our megacities is the extremely low quality of automotive fuel. The solution is very simple but expensive. Use of environmentally friendly fuels (natural gas, liquid hydrogen, ethyl alcohol and other varieties of "green gasoline").
Pollution is a coastal areas were made a dumping site of water smoke coming from facfories from vehicles and burning plastic and oil spills.
pollution mostly occur because fumes and a fire.
Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?
Pollution nowadays really becoming severe due to continious emission of monocarbon from vehicles. This issue cant be easily fixed because of the needs of people by means of transportation. Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?
The most important role is up to governments.
Pollution is a threat to survival. Can we just have a moment to pondered on the fact, that we are the destroyer of our own native land? We are now facing the problem which brought by human. In returned we suffer and facing the consequences that created by us. We are the ones to be blamed, our own wrong doing so we must stop pollution and let's start within ourself.
Jump to: