The thing that exists is, governments killing off their own people and fighting to kill off people of other nations, as well.
Topic: Population - page 45. (Read 24069 times)
There is no such thing as over-population. The Seasteading thread shows this - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/seasteading-1814814. Seasteading shows that we have barely started to populate the planet.
The thing that exists is, governments killing off their own people and fighting to kill off people of other nations, as well.
The thing that exists is, governments killing off their own people and fighting to kill off people of other nations, as well.
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
with the proper knowledge on how important the family planning and its effect if they dont plan for their family. I think in this way the over population will be minimize.
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
I think that there's no solution to over population. Population tend to increase as years go by. I think the best thing to do is to let the people aware of the consequences of over population. I think that family planning can help. Some countries have a "one child" policy. This would help too.
I believe that it is possible to allow children to be born only to families who can provide for a family. Many people, especially in poor countries, give birth to many children, but they can not even feed them afterwards and because of this, not only overpopulation, but also the increase in thefts is obtained.
There is no suitable sulotion to resolve the problem.
educate pll and overpopulation wont happen.
nature will produce viruses to reduce population.
when the population increases, then the food will become more and more expensive.
if 7 Billion is much, but there is alot of space for alot more people..
best way is to educate people ofc.
when the woman born her child , she should get to ligated so that even if she had sex again she wont be able to get pregnant , and for men he should get to vasectomy , so that even he got sex with lots of women he would'nt be able to pregnant women..
What sort of rubbish? Have you ever heard about condoms and their uses? There is no need for vasectomy, if the individual can afford to purchase condoms. And if I am not wrong, nowadays condoms are freely distributed by various NGOs and government agencies.
each couple should reduce their children into 1 child only ,and each couple should know the family planning method , and when the woman born her child , she should get to ligated so that even if she had sex again she wont be able to get pregnant , and for men he should get to vasectomy , so that even he got sex with lots of women he would'nt be able to pregnant women..
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
For me the best solution to resolve over population is to educate people on family planning. Espicially to those people who has no stable job. In family planning the people should focus the capacity of their income if it is enough to sustain the number of children they desired.
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
Probably FAMILY PLANNING. Having more than 3 children is a big responsibility especially if you don't have a stable job or enough to feed them and send them to school. that is why i think 2-3 children are enough.Yeah, family planning is very important to those people who do not have a stable job. But if you have enough income and you can give up what is your baby want, just go, You can use contraceptives just like pills or what ever to avoid having multiple children.
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
Probably FAMILY PLANNING. Having more than 3 children is a big responsibility especially if you don't have a stable job or enough to feed them and send them to school. that is why i think 2-3 children are enough. 
It is necessary to force each family to give birth to no more than 1 child, because if you do not start controlling births, then the place will not be enough for the land. There are many single children in orphanages, but poor countries continue to give too much birth instead of sheltering a homeless child.
I am once again saying that one child policy can kill your countries economy for just a short period of time because of your citizens lifespans. China already did it and what happen was they then closed this policy. So finding an alternative way is much better maybe a two or three children policy will do.
It is necessary to force each family to give birth to no more than 1 child, because if you do not start controlling births, then the place will not be enough for the land. There are many single children in orphanages, but poor countries continue to give too much birth instead of sheltering a homeless child.
Already some of the nations such as China are having a strict one-child policy. And China has reaped the advantage of a low population growth during the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century. India also experimented with a strict one-child policy during the 1970s, but it was never implemented (after the death of its mastermind, Sanjay Gandhi).
The problem with war is that it always kills the best people. The most intelligent people and the most hardworking ones are the first to die. On top of that, it will destroy the economy of the nation, which may take many decades to rebuild.
This is a solution that i know that Promote family planning or family planning programs to limit the number of children in a family in general and mass, thereby reducing the number of births.Delaying the marriage period in order to reduce the number of high birth rates.Addition and job creation
With increasing the standard of living of the community is expected to lose the trust of many children a lot of fortune. In addition it is also expected to increase the level of education that will change the mindset in the field of population.Raise awareness and education of population
With increasing awareness of the impact and effects of uncontrolled growth rates, it is expected the general public to volunteer to participate in the success of the family planning movement.Reduce population density with transmigration program
By spreading the population to areas with low population density expected to suppress unemployment rate due to disproportionate amount of population with the number of available employmentIncrease production and search for food sources
This is to keep pace with food supply not followed by growth rate. Each region is expected to cultivate food self-sufficiency so as not to depend on other regions.
With increasing the standard of living of the community is expected to lose the trust of many children a lot of fortune. In addition it is also expected to increase the level of education that will change the mindset in the field of population.Raise awareness and education of population
With increasing awareness of the impact and effects of uncontrolled growth rates, it is expected the general public to volunteer to participate in the success of the family planning movement.Reduce population density with transmigration program
By spreading the population to areas with low population density expected to suppress unemployment rate due to disproportionate amount of population with the number of available employmentIncrease production and search for food sources
This is to keep pace with food supply not followed by growth rate. Each region is expected to cultivate food self-sufficiency so as not to depend on other regions.
It is necessary to force each family to give birth to no more than 1 child, because if you do not start controlling births, then the place will not be enough for the land. There are many single children in orphanages, but poor countries continue to give too much birth instead of sheltering a homeless child.
Already some of the nations such as China are having a strict one-child policy. And China has reaped the advantage of a low population growth during the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century. India also experimented with a strict one-child policy during the 1970s, but it was never implemented (after the death of its mastermind, Sanjay Gandhi).
It is necessary to force each family to give birth to no more than 1 child, because if you do not start controlling births, then the place will not be enough for the land. There are many single children in orphanages, but poor countries continue to give too much birth instead of sheltering a homeless child.
Already some of the nations such as China are having a strict one-child policy. And China has reaped the advantage of a low population growth during the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century. India also experimented with a strict one-child policy during the 1970s, but it was never implemented (after the death of its mastermind, Sanjay Gandhi).
Jump to: