Topic: [PoS+PoW] eXocoin [EXO]-gen 2.0- dev. from scratch! Give-Away | Open Beta - page 279. (Read 415654 times)

The amount of Buy-in is too disproportionate to what I think was expected for the "Early-Bird"

Early-Bird IPO buyers are taking insane risk here,   Its entirely possible that the 2nd and 3rd buy-ins could contribute less coins in a much lower risk environment and take more EXO if it does not gain in popularity and exposure.

I know this has been addressed, but this is a major confidence issue.    I suggest removing the 3rd buy-in and and digging into the mining block to even out the risk for the first two block buyers.   Or doing something to mitigate these fears.

Can 50% mining stage dumping initial price of coin through IPO? 30% mining would be better for price.

Should be partial end in an hour -- the "release" of "white paper"

Though I think he needs to do more. He should invite Anon to be part of "alpha" testing that he is claiming is functional right now.

1K2qmHwxyZumsfWPWekrEwo62UzvxY6V9m   1.2606 BTC   6fd05b6c5dfd97163f57fed2b4808b528b3200dba7429ccda10d9d0fc1c1e88d
LcWaKoeieD3XKjNf548h97sZdhrnveUKhf   25 LTC   d93e5bcbb3874e63a94be31b34551a775cc2ae5b632b48a1aaddc99be5893553
1ERRS4jNJHq6agm1NxEDSCsiGKQZJ48nZ3   0.15 BTC   27b1d6e3705eca70270111b13070a2cd8a2bbb96fe26fdf76f586b3ed2664238
1PnyNRjiWAaRw8khbE9qdfC69yWBr8zBMC   1.09 BTC   1754e84722334b4f96fc8bec43f8de57e2d95780891e48c870729b3d62cef148

Crukkis   0.18 BTC   74ee5a73a7e15d2d79ddd56cfe9cab716b5e5af97dfd09bbef5dfe2bc2031576
MadCow   1.4865 BTC   a16b733977bb7521ac3ce9f692fb2da42499757aada6d8b1c1afdf9bcb2e595c
mudshark79   1 BTC   e022335de5c15547721b5ccaf4e1224a78301503aeed6e478a6b9916c3d51128
wesleyh   1.4865 BTC   0c15f1b0d179676b74f8b703c39e86f9786cc5bdbe0602257c7e3288b087adc0
Vega   1.09 BTC   f7462e520ddc9705c1eeea905275d24dca97aa31b7e052509a6182c3c96b5196
bitcatch   0.69 BTC   45a5de0cce204d2ecad775f35f2e4672764023a07dee584a14191838e40dc7f4
freigeist   0.2927 BTC   e760828e04cf0b6c825069e032e91995d265af3e0f16e5f1dcb7f5c8934aa2d0
drakoin   0.04045 BTC   0dd0fc17399945bdba38064025fa87baa063a22be4ecaf546817e184a30a6e3a
kodtycoon   0.3943 BTC   0b00dc00c805c8523131feaa2c2c1156ed9ba68532ed47458830fcc7bc7f120e
svojoe   1.1134 BTC   117bb026efbbe3947c32e7a51e768bdf4d6b926c442db95579354721208901f3
takramltc   49.5 LTC   c2b3cb0e0b7fba58d24310c841f244e11b0db1f891c78390120eae10957f5b10
godt   49.95 LTC   a229c1d5e2b4af354cbbf64e670b64a621c73615cf9cc65d14e8f7ccb5947449

I know how this story ends.

@ Anon136
Sent 0.93 BTC

To: 1J68eajnyueiLeYdaBUiVySFhPiwpafzmY
Debit: -0.93 BTC
Transaction ID: c872dcb33f7ed1862b1052cfcc2442ae4018fc0cea475f39b21e4589a9c79e1f

I am a greedy . I was born greedy, had no choice.  Who here is not greedy?

I seriously doubt that Anon136 would scam anyone. It's the dev that seems suspicious to me. Why incentivize risk, thus lending to a scam perception of your coin, when you could just release the white paper before taking investment. This is what any legitimate coin would do. This "dev" just seems to be taking advantage of people's greed.

@ Anon136

Sent 0.5 BTC...

To: 1J68eajnyueiLeYdaBUiVySFhPiwpafzmY
Debit: -0.50 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.0001 BTC
Net amount: -0.5001 BTC
Transaction ID: 293c91120642fb9680922f4956b4aaca92bc55f8de1c65d4329303997ac7e6e6

Why would a reputable dev even accept investments prior to the release of a white paper or, at the very least, some sample code?  Giving risk takers a greater share, when he could just release the paper and not be accused of scamming. Seems really fishy to me.

See, being civil is so much better . First of all, I am saying nothing of that sort , its your interpretation of what  u think I am saying. Risk after six months might be equal, risk right now clearly is not.

I dont think bitcointalk owners are omniscient , there is no way we can blame them for our actions.

I am concerned about this present IPO,  in which there are two ways to invest. one more risky then the other.

What u want to discuss is in the future, what I am stating is for this IPO. We are talking about two different things .  

goodnight.

It's not the question of "different degree of risk". It's equal risk as future in 6 months isn't clear.  What you are saying is that things that encourage more IPO frauds and scams should get more shares.   See what happened here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annstack-stackcoin-get-in-now-fast-decrease-launch-22022014-457575
 
close to $40,000 stolen.

That is a felony in the US .

The whole IPO drama should be shut on this forum, unless there are safety precautions included (like must be escrow based).

 This is not a question of "risk" but it's a question of crime (stealing money), and I think if this continues even when the "bitcointalk.org" owners know that most of these IPOs are fraud, "bitcointalk.org" owners themselves can be accesory to crime.

If I was attorney, I would think if the victims of the crimes have a civil case.  -- at least if these scams continue and that $40,000 becomes 4 million -- that then will be definitely a civil lawsuit against the site, as the owners knowingly allowed the fraudsters to solicit  using their platform.

yes,have probem too

yeah 

Also difficulties of different types: nginx gateway errors, database non availabilities and timeouts ...

were you guys having difficulty with bitcointalk or was that just me?

Investing is always a risk. if you dont like risks, dont invest.

eXocoin

sent 9.07467849 LTC 
Transaction-ID: 5269dba2dce0e95d0d69a618863816f015b2d2f6c9817d8947486802a8c80f5d-000

thank u for calling me stupid for not agreeing with u I dont know about u, I tend to think there different degrees of risk , what are you, an idiot .

sorry for calling u that, but tit for tat right. Anyway, lets end it here, I dont resort to name calling. Its childish, u win.

Hello I have sent ฿0.30270 to Anon136
for escrow for stage 1
TX ID: e760828e04cf0b6c825069e032e91995d265af3e0f16e5f1dcb7f5c8934aa2d0