I'll say that again. A known thief has most of the FBX in existence and most of the hashing power too. That is plenty to control markets (if one is ever created for FBX) and mess with the network. If these new coins were created because Lolcust might do something wrong, how can we support them when we KNOW that something worse has already happened?
This made me laugh. Right now if the reported 1600 blocks "stolen" in the attack is true that is only 26% of the coins in existence now.... Lolcust has over 95% of tenebrix
and most the remaining 5% of tenebrix are probably also concentrated in a few hands. bitcoinexpress, art and a couple more
I wonder how long it will take until someone will hack the tbx faucet...
1) ya know, there is no such thing as "remaining 5% of tenebrix" since there is no such thing as tenebrix upper limit. Or rather, there is -136 billions, give or take something.
I'll leave it up to you to calculate how much of "total possible TBX I've squatted.
2) hacking tenebrix faucet's wallet will give you 500 TBX at most - the whole point of fueling it in batches of 500 is to make it less lucrative target for break-ins
3) I've just noticed that your site mildly implies that efficient FPGA implementations of TBX are likely. This is not true, see "scaling questions" thread.
2) I knew you would say that. Damn. So let's say your wallet would be stolen. Would TBX be destroyed?
3) check
4) Is the scrypt algorithm secure btw?
Isn't everyone a little bit satoshi? Some should be much more satoshi.
) 
