It's a good question. The emotional highs and lows of gambling often affect the gambler's actions. If a guy is losing big, he may bet more or move up in stakes to try and win it back quickly. The term of "chasing" is often used to describe this. If a guy is winning big he may start betting less to conserve the profit, or he may get manic and feel invincible, upping the stakes. He also may "heat check" or make a bet that he wouldn't usually make if he was around even or losing, but now with the new found money he may take a flop in hold'em for more money than his good sense tells him to, just to "see if he's on a streak"
All of this is rubbish, but we are all human. The goal is to not get too high on the highs, and not get too low on the lows. For poker, riding a good or bad streak also affects how the other humans perceive you - your poker opponents are not computers, they are humans just like you, with all of the possible biases and the often misunderstanding of independent probability - so if you have won a few hands in a row, the guy in the big blind may be more "scared of you" than he should be. Keeping a level head is the goal, again much easier said than done.
A quick story somewhat off topic, but along the lines of "what motivates your opponents at the poker table" - I was in one of my first poker tournaments, a small event held in Mirage poker room c. 2004, at a time where that room was still relevant - on a break, I was talking, like a fish, to another fish. This man had just beaten me in a huge pot making a crazy call with AK on a board of 5-7-J-J - I had pocket 10's and shoved like 2x pot on the turn. He called with nothing but A-K high, and hit an Ace on the river, just like in the movies . On break I asked him "why did you call me with only AK?" (this was a time in poker when many would talk openly about the hand right after it happened, now it would be considered taboo to even ask) And this older Asian man replied to me, and I totally believe him: "I call you with Ace and King because it was heart and diamond, so I think love and money and I just go with it."
that's the kind of shit you are up against - some incomprehensible, ill-conceived logic. The way I would counter such logic at a poker table would be to valuebet this particular player heavy, go 1.3 pot if I want to, he is more likely to find some crazy reason to call than your average donk.
yes. I consider most things to be gambling. Insurance is gambling. A forced, -EV gamble in most jurisdictions. Makes me think why we are even taking a rake on things like medical insurance...
But anyway, alt coins can be beaten by pros, as I have spoke to some beating the game. It's a filthy game IMO. The pump-and-dump nature of all the scrypt hashing power pointing to the alt-du-jour, mixed with the same graph I've seen over and over again... the initial pop followed by the downward decay. To beat this game you need to be in on the pre-mines, you need to be one of the hype-men advertising the next newest, greatest alt, these guys are gifted big amounts of the new alts, and as much as they tell you they are holding for the long term, they are dumping right at the start.
The same logic applies for the (thankfully sub-categorized) HYIP scams - totally beatable - if you are the guy running it or one of the initial few guys connected to the real information. I've seen smart men game these systems successfully, treating it much like poker - sure you will lose a few pots, but you'll win far greater value than you will lose. I would never participate in an HYIP even if I thought I could beat them, as they are extremely dishonest and intentionally mismanage "investor" expectations. I only participate in gambling games where all sides agree and stick to the rules. there should be no surprises when I win or lose.