Postponing Listing on the Exchange due bear market conditions

Micerker

full member

Activity: 593

Merit: 100

BBOD The Best Derivatives Exchange

Quote from: auroboros on October 20, 2018, 11:03:03 AM

In this thread I will never offend or discriminate against a crypto project, if one of the crypto projects goes the same way as in this thread, well Im so sorry

I feel sorry for the past few months that many ICO investors and bounty hunters have had problems with the crypto projects they support. This is related to the distribution of tokens and listed in the exchange which is always postponed due to bear market problems, of course in my opinion that is the reason that is only made to increase popularity because it is increasingly blasphemed with so many people who are interested and curious (one of the marketing techniques which is weird but believe me its work)

But what I have noticed here is the reason for the bear market, well, they assume that if they force it to be able to listing as soon as possible, then what happens is a massive dump and will never be able to rise. This is strange, none of the crypto currency does not experience a dump.

Of course this is a strange reason if the developer is a professional in the world of economics and crypto, why? Because many new altcoins are listing in the exchange, they experience a dump but manage to rise again.

Reasons to avoid losses on the part of investors, really? Investor loss or loss from the Developer? I'm not sure they think of investors and bounty participants, how do you think about the project problem like this?

Many projects have delayed listing on exchanges at this time as a right decision because they know that investors who may be trying to sell their tokens will cause the project to fall into disrepair. Due to insufficient liquidity, delaying listing on exchanges will be the right decision.

bitvalak

sr. member

Activity: 868

Merit: 267

SecureShift.io | Crypto-Exchange

Quote from: auroboros on October 20, 2018, 11:03:03 AM

In this thread I will never offend or discriminate against a crypto project, if one of the crypto projects goes the same way as in this thread, well Im so sorry

I feel sorry for the past few months that many ICO investors and bounty hunters have had problems with the crypto projects they support. This is related to the distribution of tokens and listed in the exchange which is always postponed due to bear market problems, of course in my opinion that is the reason that is only made to increase popularity because it is increasingly blasphemed with so many people who are interested and curious (one of the marketing techniques which is weird but believe me its work)

But what I have noticed here is the reason for the bear market, well, they assume that if they force it to be able to listing as soon as possible, then what happens is a massive dump and will never be able to rise. This is strange, none of the crypto currency does not experience a dump.

Of course this is a strange reason if the developer is a professional in the world of economics and crypto, why? Because many new altcoins are listing in the exchange, they experience a dump but manage to rise again.

Reasons to avoid losses on the part of investors, really? Investor loss or loss from the Developer? I'm not sure they think of investors and bounty participants, how do you think about the project problem like this?

I agree with you, most new projects are afraid of dumps, whatever their reasons why they are afraid of it. Even if we think of logic, coins or any tokens I can be in a dumper at any time. Without wanting to offend other parties, I don't think they care about the discussion in this forum, because basically they use this forum only for promotional events, not for discussion.

Wale777

jr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 1

The current trend whereby ICOs delay exchange and every other plans as it is clearly outlined on the roadmap is a cheap excuse by some unserious devs capitalising on the bearish market and because of that keeps extending ICOs which is needless if their ideas are genuine and can compete in the market.. If the project is good it can list on exchange and investors will still buy because in the long run the coin will grow as long as implementation is taking with utmost importance, some coin dump because the team abandon their projects

MelodyCrypto

full member

Activity: 434

Merit: 100

in my opinion delaying listings on the exchange due bear market conditions maybe only their reasons
even though they have enough funds to pay exchange listing fee but there is no guarantee they can be accepted because each exchange has a different provision
for example is Bittrex, they don't want to listing an equity-based platform that doesn't have a good product that can make the token value grow (just highlight on the revenue sharing system to users)

iconoclast

full member

Activity: 770

Merit: 102

Matrix Built On An Ethereum Smart Contract

It shows a lack of faith in your project. Choosing not to list because of market conditions is an indication that you think the only way your token can do well is during times of irrational exuberance. Hate to be the bearer of bad new but 2017 is never coming back. What you see now is the new normal and it is not in any hurry to change from here.

TastyChillySauce00

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 1028

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: WackMack on October 21, 2018, 11:15:12 PM

Now almost all the projects carry lists and do what I think is right. Those projects that went on the stock exchange lost 80-90% of the cost. It is better to wait until the market stops falling and stabilizes.

This mainly happened to those overrated coins that actually have zero utilities but people are still buying it anyway. If the coin is really useful it won't lose its value that easily regardless of the bearish market.
However,ICOs that can't reach cap usually lost its value in an instant though.

Insert_

member

Activity: 350

Merit: 10

of course, this upsets many participants, everyone is looking forward to the listing, but I believe that some projects are not in a hurry to go to the stock exchange themselves.

AgentZero23

member

Activity: 644

Merit: 10

Quote from: auroboros on October 20, 2018, 11:03:03 AM

In this thread I will never offend or discriminate against a crypto project, if one of the crypto projects goes the same way as in this thread, well Im so sorry

I feel sorry for the past few months that many ICO investors and bounty hunters have had problems with the crypto projects they support. This is related to the distribution of tokens and listed in the exchange which is always postponed due to bear market problems, of course in my opinion that is the reason that is only made to increase popularity because it is increasingly blasphemed with so many people who are interested and curious (one of the marketing techniques which is weird but believe me its work)

But what I have noticed here is the reason for the bear market, well, they assume that if they force it to be able to listing as soon as possible, then what happens is a massive dump and will never be able to rise. This is strange, none of the crypto currency does not experience a dump.

Of course this is a strange reason if the developer is a professional in the world of economics and crypto, why? Because many new altcoins are listing in the exchange, they experience a dump but manage to rise again.

Reasons to avoid losses on the part of investors, really? Investor loss or loss from the Developer? I'm not sure they think of investors and bounty participants, how do you think about the project problem like this?

I have promoted a lot of projects and some of them until now don't get listed in a decent exchange. And mostly they answered "will not be listed yet due to current market condition" and I don't buy it. Some developers are being to shy or hesitant to say the truth that they don't have enough money and the ICO wasn't that successful. And salute to other projects even though they don't also collect enough funds, they are honest to the investors and bounty hunters.

Invigorated

jr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 2

It is quite understandable that must projects are taking this option. A project that values its idea wouldn't want to list in these conditions. It is highly likely that once a token gets listed in this market conditions, it might never recover the dip and thus, devaluing the project. Delaying listing is just a way to preserve the value of the project which should be the sole purpose of the developers.

Ibeild441

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Generally a lot of people get attracted at the beginning. If the project doesn't live up to the expectation, the obvious result is downfall. But if the project is good enough it will get the positive result.

Abohadan331

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

I think the initial hype generates overly ambitious expectation. People are desperate for a getaway coin. And whenever a coin doesn't live upto this expectation, it gets dumped massively. But I dont think legit innovative projects should stress too much mostly because people nowadays dont put all eggs in one basket.

Soaveth541

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

In my opinion, the first buzz attracts a lot of small time investors who expects a lot from ICO and try to become rich overnight and when this expectations are not met a mass dump happens. But the ICOs which shows new innovations and makes proper business model always survives.

Wiceilia220

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

In this state the prices of tokens are falling like shares in a bear market. A massive crypto dump is imminent but this is uncalled-for. Hoping the situation gets the proper limelight.

siorapokk

copper member

Activity: 190

Merit: 1

Honestly, I do not like such a decision from the team members, because this causes doubts in a project. But on the other hand, I can totally understand, why ICOs are doing so. Due to the market, there is a lack of investors right now and a lot of dumpers.

rachman mahesa

full member

Activity: 966

Merit: 111

There may be some projects that hold back from being listed in exchange for this reason. And there are also those who put it in exchange for current market conditions. I think there is nothing wrong with the project listing the current market conditions

Adecrypt83

copper member

Activity: 154

Merit: 6

I invested in four projects that are giving same excuse of why they are yet to be listed. To me, I don't think is a good argument because it is against the decentralized concept of Cryptocurrency. It is a sole responsibility of an holder for either to dump or hold a token.

WackMack

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 250

Now almost all the projects carry lists and do what I think is right. Those projects that went on the stock exchange lost 80-90% of the cost. It is better to wait until the market stops falling and stabilizes.

mald1to

jr. member

Activity: 115

Merit: 2

This kind of case is will just make the ICO lose its investors resulting to sudden failure. Everyone in the world of cryptocurrency expects their coins to be listed in exchanges especially those in the top exchange sites as it would make the market rise and the trading of coins active. And when its active it means the community are actively investing.

poodle63

hero member

Activity: 2702

Merit: 510

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: auroboros on October 21, 2018, 02:48:35 AM

Quote from: bartolo on October 20, 2018, 12:31:32 PM

Quote from: auroboros on October 20, 2018, 11:03:03 AM

But what I have noticed here is the reason for the bear market, well, they assume that if they force it to be able to listing as soon as possible, then what happens is a massive dump and will never be able to rise. This is strange, none of the crypto currency does not experience a dump.

Of course this is a strange reason if the developer is a professional in the world of economics and crypto, why? Because many new altcoins are listing in the exchange, they experience a dump but manage to rise again.

True, but this process, from the initial dump to the rise, is much longer now, it takes much more time, and in the meantime they have to deal with negativity and complaints from the investors, maybe this is what they are trying to avoid.

avoid that I think it is impossible, every project even the best will still get complaints from investors regarding their prices, I don't think that is the most appropriate reason, maybe because they feel if forcing to register now, without doing anything they will lose because Ethereum prices are much lower. of course this is a risk they must think about before launching a project

That's a joke, these ico creators must learn about how to protect their token. bear market has been playing an important role to make the price gets dumped a lot but remember if they are no selling their token with a huge bonus and then these pre-sale participants will never try to dump it or at least they must think for a twice before take any decision.

Ruben Ramsey

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

If the project is good, it would do well despite the market situation. But to minimize risk I think its a good strategy to wait for the market to enter in the bull run.

Topic: Postponing Listing on the Exchange due bear market conditions (Read 313 times)