Topic: Posts just for signature purposes or adding to knowledge? (Read 354 times)
Im doing both, posting for signature and gaining some knowledge about cryptocurrencies by participating into different crypto threads.
Mostly posts for signature purpose only. Even I am posting for signature. But some topics are out of my knowledge. Then I only read that topics and I not goes for post. I think signature post is best way to give and take knowledge.
If you cannot contribute something to the community with your knowledge then better find a topic that would let you express your idea. If you are posting in a topic that you have no idea then that would purely be for signature purpose but if you are posting about what you think about it and somehow adding knowledge for the community to know then that would be better. I prefer to add some knowledge because it is give and take anyway. I learn from you people and somehow I can share what I know.
Signature is your message and distribution of company advertising the bounty on the forum and that is , the participants of the bounty projects and investments for the company . This is success for everyone . Also you learn a lot of interesting information on the forum
Mostly posts for signature purpose only. Even I am posting for signature. But some topics are out of my knowledge. Then I only read that topics and I not goes for post. I think signature post is best way to give and take knowledge.
I think they want more weekly number of posts because they want more frequency of their signatures, so many people know more. That is also the basic principle of advertising, so I have no problem with this policy of them.
Not a bad idea. Not many posts really matter with the experience sharing the bonus campaign.
Writing posts on the forum I think serves not only for the purposes of the signature, sometimes reading the topics you find out for yourself something new and interesting, reading reviews of various people on a particular issue, thereby helping to resolve their questions)
Depends on the member, cause some members here only join signature campaign to earn rewards and they dont have intention to gain knowledge about crypto.
At the present many people use forum just for signature campaign. I thinks the bounty managers should reduce number of post for hunters who can make more educative posts.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.Sad to see the current situation of forum which is full of garbage threads but I do see its much better compared into last years when the forum hasn't that merit system. It did really somehow stop all the spams and abuse of newbie and jr accounts when it comes to bounties, giveaways and other way to earn on simple ways.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
If you are asking like this, here my answer
I posting in this forum is both for signature campaign purposes and adding knowledge on my post...
I only choose what I think is an interesting topic and then I put my comment/post on this thread, I don't want people to call me "shitposter/junkers" so I always try to make a good and on-topic in my every post...
Also, I trying to improve my English writing skill too...
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.Sad to see the current situation of forum which is full of garbage threads but I do see its much better compared into last years when the forum hasn't that merit system. It did really somehow stop all the spams and abuse of newbie and jr accounts when it comes to bounties, giveaways and other way to earn on simple ways.
90% of the users in the Bitcointalk forum are bounty hunters. It is our mission to complete the bounty mission, so most of the posts are just for signature!
Before you decided to join the Signature Campaign, you have to read the requirements and be sure to yourself that you are qualified and able to do the number of posts per week. There is an advantage towards to the number of post because it can widen your knowledge about this crypto world.
May be you are right, once i saw signature campaign that required 25 posts per week, i think it is trash. For me 10 posts per week is ok, i think it is possible to write something acceptable during seven days.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.Sad to see the current situation of forum which is full of garbage threads but I do see its much better compared into last years when the forum hasn't that merit system. It did really somehow stop all the spams and abuse of newbie and jr accounts when it comes to bounties, giveaways and other way to earn on simple ways.
If you have understood how cryptocurrency works, and how the functions this forum I am sure that every post you made will provide important information for people who read it or will give an informative post. So, you don't just come from commenting on a post or as long as you made a post to meet the target post per week when you have joined in the signature campaign.
Make 25 posts per week If you keep up the signature campaign that is paid with BTC you can make 5 posts per day, I guess it's not too much for you to do it. Indeed, I have experience and I once imagined when I was newbie 25 posts were too much for the signature campaign. However, after I had read some information about cryptocurrency and found out about the ins and outs of this forum, I was able to do that.
Make 25 posts per week If you keep up the signature campaign that is paid with BTC you can make 5 posts per day, I guess it's not too much for you to do it. Indeed, I have experience and I once imagined when I was newbie 25 posts were too much for the signature campaign. However, after I had read some information about cryptocurrency and found out about the ins and outs of this forum, I was able to do that.
Your opinion is very good and very healthy, but those merchants will not agree, because the more replies or articles that the signature needs to be published, the larger the area representing the communication!
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.
I completely agree that in many signature companies the number of posts in a week is overestimated. And unfortunately it affects quality of the majority of posts. That's because signature campaign requires to write many posts and majority of them are senseless. But what to do if requirements are so, and writing of a qualitative post with sense requires time. On the other hand if to reduce quantity of posts, then the main objective of the signature company won't be achieved. Therefore the compromise is necessary. I think it's need to limit quantity of posts to 5-7 in a week. Or to begin to consider their quality. Maybe that avoid from flood.
Jump to: