Topic: [PPC] The Future of Peercoin - Sunny King - page 2. (Read 11707 times)

PTtMMWWmeRGrV3zKAAiZAcqeUMnfEHKJFH

TQ

I don't agree with this at all. We need to understand that these networks and the protocols represent real world phenomena. In respect to bitcoin, the network is a virtual representation of the gold mining process. Gold mining in the context of the gold rushes in America, just like bitcoin mining when the software first came out, was a very democratic process in which almost anyone could attempt to search for gold. As the more easily reachable gold became collected it meant that miners needed more expensive equipment to acquire the gold beneath the earths surface. This transition lends itself to the monopolization of gold mining, in the same way that there is a monopoly in the bitcoin mining today. There are two mining pools that already comprise more than 50% of the network hashrate. This does not augur well for the security of the network, which is why I am more of a proponent of the ppc network.

Looking at peercoin we also see a similar phenomena of unfairness, as the network ostensibly stands as a virtual representation of our current economic system. The network protocol uses POS to both encourage saving while simultaneously encouraging spending through the 1% inflation. If our societies, particularly developed nations such as the US where economic systems of this sort have traditionally been implemented, are becoming more an more stratified through these systems, what would make someone think that in the virtual realm this phenomena would not also hold true?

With these network protocols we have the means by which to implement fully automated economics systems that achieve the re distributive properties that are attempted through taxation and welfare. Perhaps if coin age and the number of coins saved did not equally factor into stake, there would be a more equitable system.  

http://cdn.meme.li/i/pak0p.jpg
PWsieDv55YbVpR8dpU96EQPx5RQsNWYh3t

PC2WgHSuKR8oaeemF4P54UCLW8ibfaQSDp

TQ

PXroy5R6oK79fFwaRGdHvNs7SrRRxGXQU1

TQ

PPDVMKzKSktGpRKPDZnzNPw82uvzqUdZGg

TQ

PXqiVyfsSNhTizgcjiF4WPBJFAStNYh1GR

TQ

lol

PFg5EFp7jzKy6GM18AfCLYCTWehHnJKxJ9

Tq

May it be the case that some didn't read the initial post in this thread (what in general can be a good idea, and definitely is in this case)?
For convenience: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3448964

And for even more convenience:

And as there has no new discussion started yet, you might save your time and your wallet addresses for later.
...I doubt it is conidered meaningful posting barely more than an address

PAbUUSGdFK3cbGL2rNkNS7KXzbBVSoCVjD

PHSU9vrscxTpAVusMiKfpBZ7BLtor2syso

PGnBZ7C6xQB12YAQnVYtVNw7R2xR1RshKe

TQ

PNmBgV9zxz6KG982FptqzbsvQ6kpQSiJpo

Thanks...

PSxDTJR7xvZVNixbSVwm2b6aXuczvZL7PG

ty 

PRTxr42wySuahddDNQcXNv2F4NMsVfwEbn

thanks

PAdxSoqwM4qtKhTcQ9kASJTE3AJZE879U2

TQ

PS44s9hzGdhBVX98gpKfcTruZLFMGJgztR

 

PJn7YpYwbqAcKtjM96uxoMr9HPL1wvA1PQ

Tq

PEMnkKxHgD39EL68ghLnxVwM4D53JGeUnW

Tq