Topic: [PRE-ANN] BitmarkDark - Anonymous Marking™ (Read 3354 times)
so this thread is dead i supposed
1. no affiliation
2. use pfennig
3. don't be useless
4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with
5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point.
6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling.
7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web.
Good luck
2. use pfennig
3. don't be useless
4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with
5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point.
6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling.
7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web.
Good luck
Is there a primer on Marking ? What are its origins, what are the main problems it aims to resolve, or the benefits it wants to bring, and in particular how is it implemented and begin used by bitmark. Thanks in advance !
http://faq.bitmark.co/
https://github.com/project-bitmark/marking/wiki
Another one on the long, dark road.
1. no affiliation
2. use pfennig
3. don't be useless
4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with
5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point.
6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling.
7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web.
Good luck
2. use pfennig
3. don't be useless
4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with
5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point.
6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling.
7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web.
Good luck
Is there a primer on Marking ? What are its origins, what are the main problems it aims to resolve, or the benefits it wants to bring, and in particular how is it implemented and begin used by bitmark. Thanks in advance !
Bitmarkdark?
I think yes...
I think yes...
yes
No way!
This is scam
This is scam
bad name, better is bitlitdogvertdarklightcoin™ Use my advice 
Use my advice
This Must be a joke...I won't even waste my time ranting about this!
Are you going to have KlaranetDark too?
Bitmarkdark(BTMD)™
More info coming soon.
nein More info coming soon.
1. no affiliation
2. use pfennig
3. don't be useless
4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with
5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point.
6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling.
7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web.
Good luck
2. use pfennig
3. don't be useless
4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with
5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point.
6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling.
7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web.
Good luck
What about a bitcoindarkdark?
It's the Dr. Seuss of crypto (TM)
"Dark" again
Just when you thought crypto could not get any worse...
MAD PAINT SKILLS BRO!
pls noooo
isnt there any other coins of u dev where u can work on?
isnt there any other coins of u dev where u can work on?
Ok™
L
exactly
exactly
Jump to: