I wanted to ignore this theme as yetcoin. But can't. I see an idea. I see the true words (about actually problem). But I don't see any really methods, that allows to exclude the problems.
Why the target audience can't use another coin? What is difference? In the name only? And in the true words?
What is integration advantage over other currencies? (Hint: if the target audience doesn't runs to use anythink still, that means it's no profit to do).
Constructive.
If you want to greate a currency from the clean page I think you should be use the P-o-S system. And see to 2d generation. But even then I don't see any advantages over other currencies. I think the currency must have more interested sides to have a value. (Even existing great currencies have too small interested sides to be stable today). There should be any great innovation (that satisfy interests of TA).
Including the above facts I think it's more rationally today to wait the Ethirium and create a metacurrency over it. - So you'll economy the time and it's may be better result. (It's actually if you have no any great innovation).
Wishing success. Supporting you.
Why the target audience can't use another coin? What is difference? In the name only? And in the true words?
What is integration advantage over other currencies? (Hint: if the target audience doesn't runs to use anythink still, that means it's no profit to do).
Constructive.
If you want to greate a currency from the clean page I think you should be use the P-o-S system. And see to 2d generation. But even then I don't see any advantages over other currencies. I think the currency must have more interested sides to have a value. (Even existing great currencies have too small interested sides to be stable today). There should be any great innovation (that satisfy interests of TA).
Including the above facts I think it's more rationally today to wait the Ethirium and create a metacurrency over it. - So you'll economy the time and it's may be better result. (It's actually if you have no any great innovation).
Wishing success. Supporting you.
thank you radfuk. i want patients to see Cura as an alternative insurance without restrictions. the whole reason for pushing Cura forward is the people and the service behind it. without revealing much information, i am a future clinician, not just from being a developer. i will introduce Cura to the local docs here as well as my friends also. also, i want to run a good but inexpensive (Raspberry pi) on top of Cura for great provider/patient experience in regarding to peer-to-peer transaction. i have been working with QR scanner software, building backend, and fudging around with affordable hardware for half a year prior to getting into Cura.
there are obvious roadblocks from old-timers docs but there are some supports as well. considering cryptocurrency is being debated, discussed, on FinCEN table in the financial circle, the idea of having a cryptocurrency in the medical field is obviously more obscure. but, that is also the reason why Cura must be push forward, so that de-centralized medicine gains more legitimacy and acceptance.
you guys can call me an idealist, an outsider, a minority, but regardless of all, a voice is still a voice.
i have an ongoing discussion on /r/medicine please check it out http://www.reddit.com/r/medicine/comments/1wexrf/cura_proposal_to_decentralizing_medicine/
That doesn't explain why doctors couldn't use bitcoin or litecoin. They are both finite coins and are both great stores of wealth.
Atleast a PoS coin would grow in value faster and not waste electricity going forward.
. I myself want to instill the de-centralize medicine movement. 