Is this just an attempt to create a game to stimulate the need for a new Alt coin? < EmpireCoin > This part of this whole idea made me pull out, " As with other cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, miners have veto authority over any transactions included in their block. Because miners have some influence on the winning empire it is possible that your votes may not be counted. "
Get a solution for that problem and I would consider playing it. No need to waste time on something that can be manipulated.
Hi Kakmakr, thanks for bringing up this important issue. EmpireCoin addresses the incentive to exclude votes in two ways:
1. Each round consists of many blocks (currently 10 blocks per round)Assume that each mining pool has a few empires that they want to win. These pools will therefore mine blocks that only include votes for those empires. With a variety of mining pools winning blocks in a round, most votes should eventually be included in the round. Recognizing that it is impractical to influence the outcome in this way, miners would therefore abandon this strategy and instead confirm all voting transactions in order to maximize their fees.
2. Proof of stakeAnother risk is where mining pools do not immediately release blocks and instead build up several blocks which are released all at once, orphaning blocks which have been published by honest miners. In Bitcoin, this is a problem because the longest chain (the chain with the most proof of work) is considered the true chain. If this were the case in EmpireCoin, we might expect mining pools to exclude all voting transactions other than their own and mine a chain of 10 blocks which are released all at once, allowing the mining pool to keep 100% of voting rewards for the round. However, EmpireCoin does not consider the longest chain to be the true chain, instead EmpireCoin uses a function which is a hybrid of proof of work and proof of stake. In this case, the proof of stake component is simply the total number of votes in the potential chain. Pools that pursue this strategy would have a small number of votes on their chain, thereby scoring poorly on proof of stake and allowing their chain to be overtaken by honest chains which score highly on proof of stake by including all voting transactions that have been published.
Also note that this thread is announcing the launch of EmpireCoin private games. The fully decentralized EmpireCoin currency will be released separately in the Altcoin subforum. For private games, this is not an issue since all blocks are mined by a single trusted miner with a policy of confirming all voting transactions in every block.
can I earn bitcoins also for playing this game? I am a big fan of strategy and skill based games, I want to get an invite.
thank you.
In the free games there is no money in the pot when the game ends and therefore you wouldn't earn bitcoins even if you do well. For the paid games, you may either lose or win money depending on how well you do and how much money you put in.
this is very interesting can i join ? anyways after checking your site looks like china and usa has disqualified
according to the site that Any empire with more than 25% of the votes is disqualified from winning the round and then the eligible empire with the most votes wins the round, it means that votes of the empire must be lower than 25 % right?
Empires are only disqualified if they have more than 25% when the voting round ends. So China and USA may currently be over 25% but they could still win if they are under 25% when the first round ends. Note that the 25% is not fixed - different games may have different voting percentage caps.