whether the transaction is in some way legally? I just know that expensive items are often processed through lawyers.
Well, I think the blockchain technology will allow you to conduct transactions as safely as possible without any commissions and additional fees 
Topic: 🔥[Pre-ICO]✅ ArtPro - The Art of blockchain - Join Whitelist✅ - page 46. (Read 194048 times)
whether the transaction is in some way legally? I just know that expensive items are often processed through lawyers.
Are such artists generally keen on cryptocurrency? They can get here only at the personal invitation of the administrator.
It's not about cryptocurrencies but that it will help artists to sell their paintings quickly and safely. That is, it will be the most profitable for everyone.
I fully agree that professionals are unlikely to take part in the project, as regards the experienced ones. However, new artists can pay attention to the platform.
Or, give some bonuses to astists, like reward for using that marketplace.I fully agree that professionals are unlikely to take part in the project, as regards the experienced ones. However, new artists can pay attention to the platform.
Or, give some bonuses to astists, like reward for using that marketplace.I fully agree that professionals are unlikely to take part in the project, as regards the experienced ones. However, new artists can pay attention to the platform.
Or, give some bonuses to astists, like reward for using that marketplace. 
I fully agree that professionals are unlikely to take part in the project, as regards the experienced ones. However, new artists can pay attention to the platform.
The main purpose is remarkable and very useful, but there's the issue of the initial information that must be provided from another source. How do you think to handle with that? Thanks!
If you are talking about the authenticity of the paintings, then it is too early to talk about it. Everything is solved very simply: the work must be sold either by the artist or he must give power of attorney to sell his works.Sorry, but in my opinion is the main thing: if the 1st information is wrong that all the immutable chain lose its purpose. It's not for criticism, but I think that, if you want to operate also for already existent items and not just with new ones, you should consider a bit more this thing.
Look it's simple: if a new work of art come out it will be registered on the blockchain and in this way it will be authenticated, right? Every time this item will pass from an owner to another there will be a way to certify that passage. If, on the contrary, we are talking about an already existent item in which way its registration will be certified? That was my question.
do tokens give any dividends or voting rights in the company? Is there any information on that?
I don’t know about the voting, but you will be rewarded for advertising the project through various methods for this, but contact the moderators for this at least. 
The main purpose is remarkable and very useful, but there's the issue of the initial information that must be provided from another source. How do you think to handle with that? Thanks!
If you are talking about the authenticity of the paintings, then it is too early to talk about it. Everything is solved very simply: the work must be sold either by the artist or he must give power of attorney to sell his works.Sorry, but in my opinion is the main thing: if the 1st information is wrong that all the immutable chain lose its purpose. It's not for criticism, but I think that, if you want to operate also for already existent items and not just with new ones, you should consider a bit more this thing.
Look it's simple: if a new work of art come out it will be registered on the blockchain and in this way it will be authenticated, right? Every time this item will pass from an owner to another there will be a way to certify that passage. If, on the contrary, we are talking about an already existent item in which way its registration will be certified? That was my question.
what else will be offered to users besides the marketplace? It would be most interesting. whether the project is to cooperate with some galleries and museums?
It would be most interesting. I would like to understand who is ready to support the project at these stages.I already asked about partnerships, but I think that information will be available after official marketplace start.
what else will be offered to users besides the marketplace? It would be most interesting. whether the project is to cooperate with some galleries and museums?
It would be most interesting. I would like to understand who is ready to support the project at these stages.
what else will be offered to users besides the marketplace? It would be most interesting. whether the project is to cooperate with some galleries and museums?
You guys are right, the project should be repeatedly tested by users before starting, preferably for a reward. But it seems that the developer is not particularly interesting.
A lot of times i see that the project team rarely answered questions on the forum. Later it turned out that they were doing a project that was successful.You guys are right, the project should be repeatedly tested by users before starting, preferably for a reward. But it seems that the developer is not particularly interesting.
A lot of times i see that the project team rarely answered questions on the forum. Later it turned out that they were doing a project that was successful.
do tokens give any dividends or voting rights in the company? Is there any information on that?
You guys are right, the project should be repeatedly tested by users before starting, preferably for a reward. But it seems that the developer is not particularly interesting.
If the admin is still going to launch such an event, then you need to pretty much prepare for this, because it is during the testing moments that users will carefully find fault with every little thing.You guys are right, the project should be repeatedly tested by users before starting, preferably for a reward. But it seems that the developer is not particularly interesting.
If the admin is still going to launch such an event, then you need to pretty much prepare for this, because it is during the testing moments that users will carefully find fault with every little thing.
You guys are right, the project should be repeatedly tested by users before starting, preferably for a reward. But it seems that the developer is not particularly interesting.
Well, they will be interested in the project. since the team will have its own pool of tokens and they will be most interested in flying to the moon.
well, I still would like to wait for the first prototypes. after that, it would be easier to make a decision about investing.
Jump to: