I don't care about the price, hype or manipulation. I look at protocol and network fundamebtals and how basic markets and economics can work.
And what do you find so terrible about the protocol and the network?
It's a unique thing and even if not everyone (including me) understand COMPLETELY and perfectly how it works from a technical perspective, I'd say that anyone who invested enough to gather a few coins took the time to look a bit inside the technology and I don't see real problems.
The only problem I can indeed see would be that transactions can't be as numerous as we'd like them to.
But that's not a problem in itself, it just limits the number of users so the price inflation. But it doesn't endanger the btc in itself. And people are gathering behind solutions to this problem.
So I don't see what you're saying ^^
Ok, it boils down to this; Bitcoin is running at and over peak capacity already as it is. It does not scale. Even if SegWit becomes active this just pushes the problem ahead a little. There is still no concensus about how to solve this problem and a lot of people even think it shouldn't be addressed at all. This is a serious problem is we want Bitcoin to grow its use base. Other coins aolve this problem.
Another critical point is its complete lack of privacy and anonymity. Yes it is possible to make it complex to identify and track people and their usage but that's difficult, expensive and time consuming with bitcoin and certainly not safe.
For the digital currency of the future both these points are critical and if not addressed will be serious growth and application limitations if not its demise.
Now you can expect a flood of comments of people calling me a fudster and worse without even the smallest attempt to resolve the problems or show how these are not problems.I would call you a pessimistic or a sceptic but definitely not a fucker or a fudster ^^
Thank you for explaining yourself.
For the first point, I'd say it's not an argument against BTC. What you're saying is that it can't really scale. Well I don't know the details but the idea SG, LN and sidechains is to answer that scaling problem no? Moreover, scaling isn't a REAL problem. Scaling is a developping problem, it means it's harder for btc to conquer new users and markets, but even if BTC doesn't grow it's not very important, the price will stagnate that's all. We can stay for 2 years without developing adoption and that wouldn't be important.
For the anonymity point, doesn't bitcoin mixers answer that? Also, if you're perfectly right, bitcoin is still far more anonymous than a normal bank account!
I agree with the fact that it could limit the growth, but that's not a threat, there is no need for an important growth in itself