Topic: President Trumps Budget: Lets make the military great again (Read 820 times)
Good evening folks 
So, Trump's first budget hit the deck today. Interesting, but nothing surprising. Unilateral cuts in everything but security spending. While I believe in a strong defense, given our obvious military superiority, I don't know if I agree with defunding social institutions and regulatory agencies in order to needlessly extenuate it. It's like we overnight said 'fuck human development, we needz more gunz!'.
Also, not seeing anything addressing entitlements. We never seem to get around to appropriately taxing the elite, but that's an argument for another time. 1.5 trillion. I want to see how the GOP reacts to this, they have been a long proponent of a balanced budget and this, is not that.
Thoughts?
So, Trump's first budget hit the deck today. Interesting, but nothing surprising. Unilateral cuts in everything but security spending. While I believe in a strong defense, given our obvious military superiority, I don't know if I agree with defunding social institutions and regulatory agencies in order to needlessly extenuate it. It's like we overnight said 'fuck human development, we needz more gunz!'.
Also, not seeing anything addressing entitlements. We never seem to get around to appropriately taxing the elite, but that's an argument for another time. 1.5 trillion. I want to see how the GOP reacts to this, they have been a long proponent of a balanced budget and this, is not that.
Thoughts?
We may not know but there are major and concrete reasons why this kind of budgeting occurs. The possible reason is the threat of a War, if you have heard about the missile launching of North Korea towards the north sea of Japan then you will realize that those missile can reach the United States of America. Trump has increased or prioritized the budget on the military not only to protect the sovereignty of America but also its allied countries who are at risk.
Good evening folks
So, Trump's first budget hit the deck today. Interesting, but nothing surprising. Unilateral cuts in everything but security spending. While I believe in a strong defense, given our obvious military superiority, I don't know if I agree with defunding social institutions and regulatory agencies in order to needlessly extenuate it. It's like we overnight said 'fuck human development, we needz more gunz!'.
Also, not seeing anything addressing entitlements. We never seem to get around to appropriately taxing the elite, but that's an argument for another time. 1.5 trillion. I want to see how the GOP reacts to this, they have been a long proponent of a balanced budget and this, is not that.
Thoughts?
So, Trump's first budget hit the deck today. Interesting, but nothing surprising. Unilateral cuts in everything but security spending. While I believe in a strong defense, given our obvious military superiority, I don't know if I agree with defunding social institutions and regulatory agencies in order to needlessly extenuate it. It's like we overnight said 'fuck human development, we needz more gunz!'.
Also, not seeing anything addressing entitlements. We never seem to get around to appropriately taxing the elite, but that's an argument for another time. 1.5 trillion. I want to see how the GOP reacts to this, they have been a long proponent of a balanced budget and this, is not that.
Thoughts?
We may not know but there are major and concrete reasons why this kind of budgeting occurs. The possible reason is the threat of a War, if you have heard about the missile launching of North Korea towards the north sea of Japan then you will realize that those missile can reach the United States of America. Trump has increased or prioritized the budget on the military not only to protect the sovereignty of America but also its allied countries who are at risk.
Good evening folks
So, Trump's first budget hit the deck today. Interesting, but nothing surprising. Unilateral cuts in everything but security spending. While I believe in a strong defense, given our obvious military superiority, I don't know if I agree with defunding social institutions and regulatory agencies in order to needlessly extenuate it. It's like we overnight said 'fuck human development, we needz more gunz!'.
Also, not seeing anything addressing entitlements. We never seem to get around to appropriately taxing the elite, but that's an argument for another time. 1.5 trillion. I want to see how the GOP reacts to this, they have been a long proponent of a balanced budget and this, is not that.
Thoughts?
So, Trump's first budget hit the deck today. Interesting, but nothing surprising. Unilateral cuts in everything but security spending. While I believe in a strong defense, given our obvious military superiority, I don't know if I agree with defunding social institutions and regulatory agencies in order to needlessly extenuate it. It's like we overnight said 'fuck human development, we needz more gunz!'.
Also, not seeing anything addressing entitlements. We never seem to get around to appropriately taxing the elite, but that's an argument for another time. 1.5 trillion. I want to see how the GOP reacts to this, they have been a long proponent of a balanced budget and this, is not that.
Thoughts?
We may not know but there are major and concrete reasons why this kind of budgeting occurs. The possible reason is the threat of a War, if you have heard about the missile launching of North Korea towards the north sea of Japan then you will realize that those missile can reach the United States of America. Trump has increased or prioritized the budget on the military not only to protect the sovereignty of America but also its allied countries who are at risk.
The welfare system was strained by the increasing number of uneducated Muslims, and this lead to the disintegration of the USSR.
Fertility rate among Muslims is higher than whites today no matter of welfare. But high military expenditures really hurt Soviet economy!When 20% of your population is composed of people who believe that non-believers should be beheaded, it is very difficult to implement the austerity measures in the education and healthcare sectors.
Do you think only Muslims can resist liberal fascism ("austerity")? Look at protests in Europe, most people on these events are white. 
Previously, there was a negative attitude towards Jews, and today Muslims are beginning to poison at every turn. Why are the economic problems justified by the presence of Muslims in the country? I can not see the connection with this. Although their number really increased.
You are simplifying your argument. It is true that the rising population of uneducated and unskilled Muslims was the number one reason for the disintegration of the USSR. It is not rocket science. When 20% of your population is composed of people who believe that non-believers should be beheaded, it is very difficult to implement the austerity measures in the education and healthcare sectors. The Central Asian states were draining the Soviet treasury at an alarming rate starting from the 1970s. A huge chunk of the Soviet tax revenues were used to improve the condition of the hospitals and schools in the region.
The USSR collapsed from economic mismanagement, infighting, increase in the population of Muslims...
Do you have any proof? Increase in the Muslim population happened after USSR collapse, mainly in 2000's when Russian economy became much stronger than exUSSR Asian countries.I am not talking about the Muslims in the Russian Federation. I am talking about the Muslims in the USSR. I will give you evidence.
Population of major Muslim groups in the 1959 Census vs 1989 Census:
Uzbeks: 6.0 million & 16.7 million (+177.58%)
Kazakhs: 3.6 million & 8.2 million (+124.65%)
Azeris: 2.9 million & 6.8 million (+130.31%)
Tajiks: 1.3 million & 4.2 million (+201.76%)
Turkmens: 1.0 million & 2.8 million (+172.46%)
Kyrgyzs: 0.9 million & 2.5 million (+161.08%)
Now let's look at the population growth of major white groups:
Russian: +27.20%
Ukrainian: +18.61%
Belorussian: +26.82%
Moldvin: +51.41%
Lithuanian: +31.87%
German: +25.87%
Chuvash: +25.35%
Latvian: +4.25%
Mordvin: -10.20%
The welfare system was strained by the increasing number of uneducated Muslims, and this lead to the disintegration of the USSR.
The USSR collapsed from economic mismanagement, infighting, increase in the population of Muslims...
Do you have any proof? Increase in the Muslim population happened after USSR collapse, mainly in 2000's when Russian economy became much stronger than exUSSR Asian countries.I am not talking about the Muslims in the Russian Federation. I am talking about the Muslims in the USSR. I will give you evidence.
Population of major Muslim groups in the 1959 Census vs 1989 Census:
Uzbeks: 6.0 million & 16.7 million (+177.58%)
Kazakhs: 3.6 million & 8.2 million (+124.65%)
Azeris: 2.9 million & 6.8 million (+130.31%)
Tajiks: 1.3 million & 4.2 million (+201.76%)
Turkmens: 1.0 million & 2.8 million (+172.46%)
Kyrgyzs: 0.9 million & 2.5 million (+161.08%)
Now let's look at the population growth of major white groups:
Russian: +27.20%
Ukrainian: +18.61%
Belorussian: +26.82%
Moldvin: +51.41%
Lithuanian: +31.87%
German: +25.87%
Chuvash: +25.35%
Latvian: +4.25%
Mordvin: -10.20%
The welfare system was strained by the increasing number of uneducated Muslims, and this lead to the disintegration of the USSR.
.....
Entitlements aren't really the agenda of any Republican. And so is the "bigger, better, stronger" military...there's no end to the size of the military they want to build, you know, for defense.
There is a large group of republicans that are literally no different than the democrats. Entitlements aren't really the agenda of any Republican. And so is the "bigger, better, stronger" military...there's no end to the size of the military they want to build, you know, for defense.
.....
I sit somewhere in the middle. But I don't think taxing the rich is the automatic right answer. How about taxing the rich that don't contribute equally to society in other ways. Let's tax the actors, actresses, sports players, (unoriginal) music artists that do what they do regardless of the money and don't really improve society much. Let's not feel the need to tax (to no end) the people that run businesses that provide people jobs, the entrepreneurs that make our lives easier, the economists that make our lives more affordable.
I sit somewhere in the middle. But I don't think taxing the rich is the automatic right answer. How about taxing the rich that don't contribute equally to society in other ways. Let's tax the actors, actresses, sports players, (unoriginal) music artists that do what they do regardless of the money and don't really improve society much. Let's not feel the need to tax (to no end) the people that run businesses that provide people jobs, the entrepreneurs that make our lives easier, the economists that make our lives more affordable.
That's really a cool idea. Tax the non producers. I would only caution about the need to correctly define producers, such that manufacturers and distributers of beer, wine and liquor have "producer status."
All politicians would have non producer status, as would all in the media and "news" businesses.
The USSR collapsed from economic mismanagement, infighting, increase in the population of Muslims...
Do you have any proof? Increase in the Muslim population happened after USSR collapse, mainly in 2000's when Russian economy became much stronger than exUSSR Asian countries. Misplacement of priority! How on earth do we get here. The world is moving closer to the end if not how do we forget humans development, health care, fighting poverty and water and foods security to defence. Not only American the whole world today are in fear of seed formal sow by our forefather. I so much believe that the end is here and is here for the good of God children.
Calm down. The world is not going to "end", at least for the next 1 billion years. And technology is rapidly improving, making our lives easier every day. Water/food security, healthcare, and poverty is no longer a concern in 90% of the nations.
When 1 billion people dont have enough to eat and 2.5 billion people are living in 3rd world shit holes.
No wonder that guy is a trump fan. Brainless chicken.
Misplacement of priority! How on earth do we get here. The world is moving closer to the end if not how do we forget humans development, health care, fighting poverty and water and foods security to defence. Not only American the whole world today are in fear of seed formal sow by our forefather. I so much believe that the end is here and is here for the good of God children.
Calm down. The world is not going to "end", at least for the next 1 billion years. And technology is rapidly improving, making our lives easier every day. Water/food security, healthcare, and poverty is no longer a concern in 90% of the nations.
When 1 billion people dont have enough to eat and 2.5 billion people are living in 3rd world shit holes.
No wonder that guy is a trump fan. Brainless chicken.
So large military spending is complete madness! Soviet Union collapsed under pressure from military industries imbalance stifling civil economy, USA is not different. You "patriots" must learn history!
The USSR collapsed from economic mismanagement, infighting, increase in the population of Muslims, and the declining crude oil and natural gas revenues. The increase in military spending had only a very small role in the disintegration of the Soviet Union.
good news more weapons for these kids 
Have you seen his chief strategist Steve Bannon? If you have seen his documentary films. You would be surprised and cynical on why Trump even hired him in the first place. He would probably just suggest to trump to max out the budget allocated to military expenditure and ignore the sciences research. Heck, all the previous measures to counteract global warming and coal usage are already pulled back because apparently global warming is fake.
Bannon knows that their will be a inevitable war with china and russia should be a US ally when that time comes.
He is like the US american alexandr dugin.
Obvious why russia supports the actual us .gov and has so many connections to them.
Have you seen his chief strategist Steve Bannon? If you have seen his documentary films. You would be surprised and cynical on why Trump even hired him in the first place. He would probably just suggest to trump to max out the budget allocated to military expenditure and ignore the sciences research. Heck, all the previous measures to counteract global warming and coal usage are already pulled back because apparently global warming is fake.
Misplacement of priority! How on earth do we get here. The world is moving closer to the end if not how do we forget humans development, health care, fighting poverty and water and foods security to defence. Not only American the whole world today are in fear of seed formal sow by our forefather. I so much believe that the end is here and is here for the good of God children.
Calm down. The world is not going to "end", at least for the next 1 billion years. And technology is rapidly improving, making our lives easier every day. Water/food security, healthcare, and poverty is no longer a concern in 90% of the nations.
Misplacement of priority! How on earth do we get here. The world is moving closer to the end if not how do we forget humans development, health care, fighting poverty and water and foods security to defence. Not only American the whole world today are in fear of seed formal sow by our forefather. I so much believe that the end is here and is here for the good of God children.
Also, not seeing anything addressing entitlements. We never seem to get around to appropriately taxing the elite, but that's an argument for another time. 1.5 trillion. I want to see how the GOP reacts to this, they have been a long proponent of a balanced budget and this, is not that.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Thoughts: There is benefit to allowing investment to happen organically, rather than forced by the government. A free economy provides more opportunity for all...all one needs is the will to capitalize on the opportunity available to them, then seek better opportunity and repeat.
Entitlements aren't really the agenda of any Republican. And so is the "bigger, better, stronger" military...there's no end to the size of the military they want to build, you know, for defense.
I sit somewhere in the middle. But I don't think taxing the rich is the automatic right answer. How about taxing the rich that don't contribute equally to society in other ways. Let's tax the actors, actresses, sports players, (unoriginal) music artists that do what they do regardless of the money and don't really improve society much. Let's not feel the need to tax (to no end) the people that run businesses that provide people jobs, the entrepreneurs that make our lives easier, the economists that make our lives more affordable.
So large military spending is complete madness! Soviet Union collapsed under pressure from military industries imbalance stifling civil economy, USA is not different. You "patriots" must learn history!
The USSR collapsed from economic mismanagement, infighting, increase in the population of Muslims, and the declining crude oil and natural gas revenues. The increase in military spending had only a very small role in the disintegration of the Soviet Union.
Jump to: