Pages:
Author

Topic: [Preview] Smelter - GPU miner for WhirlpoolX (Vanillacoin) - page 6. (Read 132861 times)

sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Profit estimation per 1 MH/s for Quark and Securecoin:
QRK:1000000*60*60*24*128*0.00000110/16777216/124 = 0.00584 BTC/day
SRC:1000000*60*60*24*5*0.00041263/16777216/1462 = 0.00726 BTC/day


How much accurate is this?
That's from October. Profit is much less now because of increased hash rates on QRK and SRC.

How many SRC and QRK can we generate at current difficulty with 1MH/sec?
Will average 7QRK or 0.8SRC a day.

Since Smelter doesn't work with pools, it averages out to:
~2 QRK blocks a day.
1 block on SRC every 5 days
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Profit estimation per 1 MH/s for Quark and Securecoin:
QRK:1000000*60*60*24*128*0.00000110/16777216/124 = 0.00584 BTC/day
SRC:1000000*60*60*24*5*0.00041263/16777216/1462 = 0.00726 BTC/day


How much accurate is this?
That's from October. Profit is much less now because of increased hash rates on QRK and SRC.

How many SRC and QRK can we generate at current difficulty with 1MH/sec?
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
something is very wrong with your miner  Angry i thought its supposed to take only 12.5% as fee and not all the coins ??
mined a coin where a block is 50k reward. here is what is left

6.1k is version1 posted from OP and v2 is 6.5k

It most likely unable to send the actual amount because it was designed for Quark and not Particle. So you only get the donation amount and not the full amount

How to solve the problem

I'm curious how you are mining through PRT wallet? Shouldnt it display the transaction as a incoming transaction icon and not mining icons?
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Profit estimation per 1 MH/s for Quark and Securecoin:
QRK:1000000*60*60*24*128*0.00000110/16777216/124 = 0.00584 BTC/day
SRC:1000000*60*60*24*5*0.00041263/16777216/1462 = 0.00726 BTC/day


How much accurate is this?
That's from October. Profit is much less now because of increased hash rates on QRK and SRC.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Profit estimation per 1 MH/s for Quark and Securecoin:
QRK:1000000*60*60*24*128*0.00000110/16777216/124 = 0.00584 BTC/day
SRC:1000000*60*60*24*5*0.00041263/16777216/1462 = 0.00726 BTC/day


How much accurate is this?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Can we mine any cpu coin with this?

You can mine any CPU coin that uses quark algorithm. i.e. PRT, Offerings, ATOM, FRQ, etc..
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Can we mine any cpu coin with this?
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 255
HALA MADRID
No worries. I have no idea how to compile things anyway.
hero member
Activity: 524
Merit: 500
I can update my drivers easy enough, and if things don't work, roll back to 12.8. that's not an issue.
TL;DR - just wait
It's not going to help - the problem is most probably caused by drivers on my PC, where I did compile OpenCL sources into binary blobs. The right way to fix it (at least, to try to fix) would be releasing kernel sources and compiling it on your PC, with your drivers. I want to withhold some parts of the kernel (mostly related to copy-protection), to do it I have to do some programming and testing and that is postponed until arrival of new GPU.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 255
HALA MADRID
I can update my drivers easy enough, and if things don't work, roll back to 12.8. that's not an issue.
hero member
Activity: 524
Merit: 500
I"m running 12.8
Thank you, It gives a hope that the error is on AMD side Smiley I used 13.x to compile the kernel, may be the support for old version is rusted. Well, let's postpone bughunting a bit.

- make new closed-source release for PTS
Will it be faster then the existed one?
That depends on the exact meaning of the word 'will' Smiley If it will be superior to the existing miners, it will not be released so there will be no Smelter for PTS Smiley

Hell... if you can get one up and running that supports stratum pools... I'll toss you 10 QRK for every 50 QRK that I mine for the next 3 months. Smiley
Quark mining is almost over, if you really want to reward me - wait for the sources and invent better trick around Groestl hash, I'd like to see how this beast can be tamed Smiley
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
- make new closed-source release for PTS

Will it be faster then the existed one?
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 255
HALA MADRID
No worries. and I agree, the speed was phenomenal. it would make solo mining easy. lol. I think I'll try dropping the intensity down to likr 3 and work up from there
Not sure if it helps, most probably something went wrong when I compiled OpenCL sources into binary blob. Just in case, what version of drivers do you have installed?

I"m running 12.8
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Yeah... I mined your mom last night.
You know... after having some issues with your program here... as well as an issue that you want to take 1/8th of everyone's work... I decided to pull this apart.

"This program cannot be run in DOS mode"

Really? A DOS program that can't be run in DOS? Silly me...
I deserve a better cracker for my masterpiece, this one even don't know about PE format! Cheesy Seriously, if you want to hack away 10% royalty, you have to hack GPU code, not only x86 one.


Thought I'd catch your attention with that one. Wink

Nah, I'm not gonna hack your 10% away.

Hell... if you can get one up and running that supports stratum pools... I'll toss you 10 QRK for every 50 QRK that I mine for the next 3 months. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 912
Merit: 1000
Anyone have hash rate results for a 7770 card?
hero member
Activity: 524
Merit: 500
No worries. and I agree, the speed was phenomenal. it would make solo mining easy. lol. I think I'll try dropping the intensity down to likr 3 and work up from there
Not sure if it helps, most probably something went wrong when I compiled OpenCL sources into binary blob. Just in case, what version of drivers do you have installed?
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 255
HALA MADRID
No worries. and I agree, the speed was phenomenal. it would make solo mining easy. lol. I think I'll try dropping the intensity down to likr 3 and work up from there
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 255
HALA MADRID
ok, so this is the output I get w/ debug.

Code:
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Roy Huntley>cd /fzn

C:\fzn>frozen

C:\fzn>smelter --debug -o http://127.0.0.1:18450 -u frozenrpc -p x -w 64 -g 1 -i
 20 -a FPvFVQXGTeeHTdfqfsACDRAfj5HPi1BjkA
smelter v0.3 (c) Smolen
Royalty: 1/10
Pool::Start()
Pool::ThreadFunc() started
nPlatforms==1
Platform #0 id:6D496514
CL_PLATFORM_PROFILE:FULL_PROFILE
CL_PLATFORM_VERSION:OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.2)
CL_PLATFORM_NAME:AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
CL_PLATFORM_VENDOR:Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
CL_PLATFORM_EXTENSIONS:cl_khr_icd cl_amd_event_callback cl_amd_offline_devices c
l_khr_d3d10_sharing
# of devices: 1
        Device #0 id==00DC6F10
        CL_DEVICE_NAME:Cypress
        CL_DEVICE_VENDOR:Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
        CL_DEVICE_VERSION:OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.2)
        CL_DRIVER_VERSION:CAL 1.4.1741 (VM)
        CL_DEVICE_ADDRESS_BITS:32
        CL_DEVICE_AVAILABLE:1
        CL_DEVICE_COMPILER_AVAILABLE:1
        CL_DEVICE_ENDIAN_LITTLE:1
        CL_DEVICE_ERROR_CORRECTION_SUPPORT:0
        CL_DEVICE_EXTENSIONS:cl_khr_fp64 cl_amd_fp64 cl_khr_global_int32_base_at
omics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_kh
r_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_khr_byte_addressable_st
ore cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_ext_atomic_counters_32 cl_amd_device_attribute_query cl
_amd_vec3 cl_amd_printf cl_amd_media_ops cl_amd_popcnt cl_khr_d3d10_sharing
        CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_CACHE_SIZE:0
        CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_CACHELINE_SIZE:0
        CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE:1073741824
        CL_DEVICE_LOCAL_MEM_SIZE:32768
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_CLOCK_FREQUENCY:850
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_COMPUTE_UNITS:20
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_CONSTANT_ARGS:8
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_CONSTANT_BUFFER_SIZE:65536
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE:803209216
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_PARAMETER_SIZE:1024
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_WORK_GROUP_SIZE:256
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_WORK_ITEM_DIMENSIONS:3
        CL_DEVICE_MEM_BASE_ADDR_ALIGN:2048

Loaded from archive
Building from binary quark0td_Cypress_W64.bin
Building from binary done: quark0td_Cypress_W64.bin
SummonProgram done
main loop
ThreadHost::Thread() started
1:0 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Speed: 141.06MH/s 5s: 141.54MH/s
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
1:0 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Speed: 2.72GH/s 5s: 5.28GH/s
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
1:0 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Speed: 9.04GH/s 5s: 21.77GH/s
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
^CTerminate batch job (Y/N)? y

C:\fzn>frozen

C:\fzn>smelter --debug -o http://127.0.0.1:18450 -u frozenrpc -p x -w 64 -g 1 -i
 18 -a FPvFVQXGTeeHTdfqfsACDRAfj5HPi1BjkA
smelter v0.3 (c) Smolen
Royalty: 1/10
Pool::Start()
Pool::ThreadFunc() started
nPlatforms==1
Platform #0 id:6D496514
CL_PLATFORM_PROFILE:FULL_PROFILE
CL_PLATFORM_VERSION:OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.2)
CL_PLATFORM_NAME:AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
CL_PLATFORM_VENDOR:Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
CL_PLATFORM_EXTENSIONS:cl_khr_icd cl_amd_event_callback cl_amd_offline_devices c
l_khr_d3d10_sharing
# of devices: 1
        Device #0 id==00D36F58
        CL_DEVICE_NAME:Cypress
        CL_DEVICE_VENDOR:Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
        CL_DEVICE_VERSION:OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.2)
        CL_DRIVER_VERSION:CAL 1.4.1741 (VM)
        CL_DEVICE_ADDRESS_BITS:32
        CL_DEVICE_AVAILABLE:1
        CL_DEVICE_COMPILER_AVAILABLE:1
        CL_DEVICE_ENDIAN_LITTLE:1
        CL_DEVICE_ERROR_CORRECTION_SUPPORT:0
        CL_DEVICE_EXTENSIONS:cl_khr_fp64 cl_amd_fp64 cl_khr_global_int32_base_at
omics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_kh
r_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_khr_byte_addressable_st
ore cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_ext_atomic_counters_32 cl_amd_device_attribute_query cl
_amd_vec3 cl_amd_printf cl_amd_media_ops cl_amd_popcnt cl_khr_d3d10_sharing
        CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_CACHE_SIZE:0
        CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_CACHELINE_SIZE:0
        CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE:1073741824
        CL_DEVICE_LOCAL_MEM_SIZE:32768
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_CLOCK_FREQUENCY:850
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_COMPUTE_UNITS:20
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_CONSTANT_ARGS:8
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_CONSTANT_BUFFER_SIZE:65536
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE:803209216
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_PARAMETER_SIZE:1024
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_WORK_GROUP_SIZE:256
        CL_DEVICE_MAX_WORK_ITEM_DIMENSIONS:3
        CL_DEVICE_MEM_BASE_ADDR_ALIGN:2048

Loaded from archive
Building from binary quark0td_Cypress_W64.bin
Building from binary done: quark0td_Cypress_W64.bin
SummonProgram done
main loop
ThreadHost::Thread() started
1:0 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Speed: 9.61MH/s 5s: 9.62MH/s
1:0 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Speed: 99.02MH/s 5s: 188.34MH/s
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
1:0 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Speed: 875.35MH/s 5s: 2.43GH/s
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
NONCE overflow
Discarding stale work
NONCE overflow
^CTerminate batch job (Y/N)? y

C:\fzn>
hero member
Activity: 524
Merit: 500
ok, so this is the output I get w/ debug.

C:\fzn>smelter --debug -o http://127.0.0.1:18450 -u frozenrpc -p x -w 64 -g 1 -i
Building from binary done: quark0td_Cypress_W64.bin
1:0 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Speed: 2.72GH/s 5s: 5.28GH/s
NONCE overflow
Thank you for the report - and sorry, I don't know what's going on. The speed is unbelievably good, most probably the compiled Quark kernel is empty, it makes no real calculation and reports hashes as done without actual hashing. So, wait and may be give Smelter next try when it will be open-sourced Sad
hero member
Activity: 524
Merit: 500
You know... after having some issues with your program here... as well as an issue that you want to take 1/8th of everyone's work... I decided to pull this apart.

"This program cannot be run in DOS mode"

Really? A DOS program that can't be run in DOS? Silly me...
I deserve a better cracker for my masterpiece, this one even don't know about PE format! Cheesy Seriously, if you want to hack away 10% royalty, you have to hack GPU code, not only x86 one.
Pages:
Jump to: