Pages:
Author

Topic: Price discovery (Read 3630 times)

legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 26, 2013, 04:37:51 AM
#50
Looks like bitpay is already using their own metric similar to this - I wonder why they dont make it public (or if they do I havent heard of it)?
http://rt.com/op-edge/bitcoin-currency-max-keiser-138/

google "bitcoin rates"

first link: https://bitpay.com/bitcoin-exchange-rates

Looks like that has been updated actually just a few days ago: http://blog.bitpay.com/2013/06/important-update-on-bitpay-exchange.html?oid=1039_1

Though I have no idea what that actually means, im just happy people are moving away from mtgox. That's what this thread was about and if its already happening, then great.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
June 26, 2013, 12:17:24 AM
#49
Looks like bitpay is already using their own metric similar to this - I wonder why they dont make it public (or if they do I havent heard of it)?
http://rt.com/op-edge/bitcoin-currency-max-keiser-138/

google "bitcoin rates"

first link: https://bitpay.com/bitcoin-exchange-rates
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 23, 2013, 04:58:12 PM
#48
Looks like bitpay is already using their own metric similar to this - I wonder why they dont make it public (or if they do I havent heard of it)?
http://rt.com/op-edge/bitcoin-currency-max-keiser-138/
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 06:38:27 PM
#47
Sounds like a good idea here is where you can begin http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/6/prweb10788675.htm
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
June 20, 2013, 04:16:05 PM
#46
I for one am sick and tired of using mtgox's price as the default price for everything. This is a vulnerability and a weakness that can and should be fixed for a decentralized system. In order to take bitcoin's price discovery to the next level I propose that we use an algorithm which is based on the price of multiple exchanges which weights the price according to volume. I built a very simple formula which weights the real-time price based on the 30 day volume. You can see it for yourself here (its an open office .ods file):

http://www.filedropper.com/pricediscovery1

This example could easily be extrapolated all USD exchanges and eventually to aggregate the total numbers by incorporating numerous currencies.

Questions for the community:

1. Is 30 days the best volume time set to use?
2. Is there another data piece which should be included?
3. What else am I missing?

If enough people here agree with me that this is something useful and should be implemented, I will put up a bounty for a site to incorporate the data in realtime (and eventually offer API support).

Thanks for your consideration

edited for clarification
I totally agree, Bitcoiners need to learn MTGOX is just another exchange, not the default bitcoin price. They can change the price for their gains just like any other exchange.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 20, 2013, 06:43:17 AM
#45
Bump as a request to the coders in the house. Can anyone confirm or deny that bitcoincharts has this functionality already in their api?

If you just want last price for various exchanges, yes.  I'm not sure what "this functionality" is?

I was referring to what hobbes posted - you can see it at the top of this page quoted
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
June 20, 2013, 03:47:34 AM
#44
Bump as a request to the coders in the house. Can anyone confirm or deny that bitcoincharts has this functionality already in their api?

If you just want last price for various exchanges, yes.  I'm not sure what "this functionality" is?
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 19, 2013, 02:32:04 AM
#43
Bump as a request to the coders in the house. Can anyone confirm or deny that bitcoincharts has this functionality already in their api?
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 14, 2013, 04:49:52 AM
#42
Before we set up a website to do this, let's be a little clever, and only have a centralised algorithm based on this thread.

So, if everyone uses the same formula, and sticks it on their websites, sampling at an hour interval but not on the hour, we will have a bitcoin price that can't be manipulated due to centralisation!

If you want, I can write a quick script that can be cut and pasted but will follow this guideline that its your server fetching the samples, as this is the principle that prevents centralisation problems. For instance, and timeouts while sampling, automatically removes that exchange from the end price.

We just need a fancy name for the formula, like "real bitcoin" price, so people know what they are talking about this price.

Feedback?


I like that idea. But before you spend too much time working on it - lets see what we can get out of bitcoincharts first
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 14, 2013, 04:48:54 AM
#41
Bitcoincharts has this already:

Quote
Weighted Prices

Bitcoincharts offers weighted prices for several currencies at http://api.bitcoincharts.com/v1/weighted_prices.json. You can use this to price goods and services in Bitcoins. This will yield much lower fluctuations than using a single market's latest price.

Weighted prices are calculated for the last 24 hours, 7 days and 30 days.

Code:
USD: {u'7d': u'103.74', u'30d': u'116.14', u'24h': u'103.02'}

EUR: {u'7d': u'79.91', u'30d': u'89.89', u'24h': u'78.27'}

With Bitcoin fluctuating wildly it might be interesting to have one for the last hour, too.

Im not a coder - so I cant see what this actually is - but is it weighted by volume? If so, that's great. They should make a feature on the site as well.
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 107
June 14, 2013, 04:02:34 AM
#40
Bitcoincharts has this already:

Quote
Weighted Prices

Bitcoincharts offers weighted prices for several currencies at http://api.bitcoincharts.com/v1/weighted_prices.json. You can use this to price goods and services in Bitcoins. This will yield much lower fluctuations than using a single market's latest price.

Weighted prices are calculated for the last 24 hours, 7 days and 30 days.

Code:
USD: {u'7d': u'103.74', u'30d': u'116.14', u'24h': u'103.02'}

EUR: {u'7d': u'79.91', u'30d': u'89.89', u'24h': u'78.27'}

With Bitcoin fluctuating wildly it might be interesting to have one for the last hour, too.

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
You are a geek if you are too early to the party!
June 13, 2013, 11:35:42 AM
#39
Before we set up a website to do this, let's be a little clever, and only have a centralised algorithm based on this thread.

So, if everyone uses the same formula, and sticks it on their websites, sampling at an hour interval but not on the hour, we will have a bitcoin price that can't be manipulated due to centralisation!

If you want, I can write a quick script that can be cut and pasted but will follow this guideline that its your server fetching the samples, as this is the principle that prevents centralisation problems. For instance, and timeouts while sampling, automatically removes that exchange from the end price.

We just need a fancy name for the formula, like "real bitcoin" price, so people know what they are talking about this price.

Feedback?





hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 504
WorkAsPro
June 13, 2013, 09:42:09 AM
#38
Quote
exchanges           1           2         3
volume               100        200      50
price                  10          12        8

...
Average bitcoin price by volume 10.87

Quote
Bitcoin Charts

Hoorah, lets do it :-)
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
You are a geek if you are too early to the party!
June 13, 2013, 09:18:11 AM
#37

Average bitcoin price 10
average bitcoin price by volume 10.87



Interesting - why do you feel using an average is more effective than using the totals?
I also multiplied the price by the volume in each case, then summed them, then summed the volume and divided the (multiplied) number total by the volume total.

My reasoning are to do with making live easy for the end user!

If you are using a total,  the end user needs to manually work out how that total figure relates to the bitcoin price - a simple enough sum but people are lazy! Wink

legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 13, 2013, 01:37:05 AM
#36
Some good feedback which needs to be addressed.

If you want the volume as well as the price, then the formula needs to be altered although the sampling per hour doesn't need to change.

Just multiply the volume of the exchange by the price.  Find the average of all the exchanges.
Now just add the volume of all the exchanges and divide it by the average of all the exchanges

for instance:


exchanges           1           2         3
volume               100        200      50
price                  10          12        8

Average bitcoin price 10
average bitcoin price by volume 10.87

This should work even better to break exchanges that try to be too cheap or too expensive compared to the world price.  This gives you a MTGox style price, but without the centralised exchange! Wink


Interesting - why do you feel using an average is more effective than using the totals?
I also multiplied the price by the volume in each case, then summed them, then summed the volume and divided the (multiplied) number total by the volume total.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
June 13, 2013, 01:31:02 AM
#35
Monsterer - can you clarify why this wouldn't represent the actual tradeable value of the currency? The idea was not to make it artificially smooth, its just a byproduct when you are incorporating more data.

A 30 day weighted average will be extraordinarily laggy. You can't really escape it completely by reducing the time-frame, lag will always be present. So its highly likely that (since bitcoin is so volatile) the weighted average indicates one price, whereas the actual trade-able value on the exchanges is nowhere near since (for example) someone just dumped 20k BTC an hour ago.

I suggest reviewing historical data and computing the average based on that, then compare that average to the actual traded price at the time to give you an idea just how bad/good this idea is.

Cheers, Paul.

Ah sorry if my original post wasn't clear, but I'm not using a 30 day weighted average price. I'm using the realtime price. The aggregate price is then weighted based on the volume that the exchange does over a 30 day time period. This ensures that the price is both real time and weights the most influential exchanges' price accordingly.

This sounds brilliant. This would mean that Mount Gox would still be the most influential at the start as it has the most volume, but would give us a price that is not solely dependant on one exchange and who's influence can become independent of any particular exchange. I look forward to seeing it made   

Thanks - and yes this is exactly the idea. It helps transition away from mtgox as smoothly as possible and also paves a way for newer, more effective exchanges to come online seamlessly.
sr. member
Activity: 660
Merit: 250
June 12, 2013, 09:37:16 PM
#34
Monsterer - can you clarify why this wouldn't represent the actual tradeable value of the currency? The idea was not to make it artificially smooth, its just a byproduct when you are incorporating more data.

A 30 day weighted average will be extraordinarily laggy. You can't really escape it completely by reducing the time-frame, lag will always be present. So its highly likely that (since bitcoin is so volatile) the weighted average indicates one price, whereas the actual trade-able value on the exchanges is nowhere near since (for example) someone just dumped 20k BTC an hour ago.

I suggest reviewing historical data and computing the average based on that, then compare that average to the actual traded price at the time to give you an idea just how bad/good this idea is.

Cheers, Paul.

Ah sorry if my original post wasn't clear, but I'm not using a 30 day weighted average price. I'm using the realtime price. The aggregate price is then weighted based on the volume that the exchange does over a 30 day time period. This ensures that the price is both real time and weights the most influential exchanges' price accordingly.

This sounds brilliant. This would mean that Mount Gox would still be the most influential at the start as it has the most volume, but would give us a price that is not solely dependant on one exchange and who's influence can become independent of any particular exchange. I look forward to seeing it made   
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
June 12, 2013, 08:35:51 PM
#33
+1 for a great come back. Smiley
+1 for MtGox not being the default for everything. People should be aware there are plenty of alternatives. More competition and diversity = more decentralization, which just makes sense with the Bitcoin philosophy in mind.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
June 12, 2013, 10:55:23 AM
#32
@nwbitcoin
I like your math there, and I think the formula makes sense. But I wonder if the resulting price is within pennies of the Mt.Gox price? In any case, It is good to prepare for a post-Gox economy.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
You are a geek if you are too early to the party!
June 12, 2013, 10:44:57 AM
#31
Some good feedback which needs to be addressed.

If you want the volume as well as the price, then the formula needs to be altered although the sampling per hour doesn't need to change.

Just multiply the volume of the exchange by the price.  Find the average of all the exchanges.
Now just add the volume of all the exchanges and divide it by the average of all the exchanges

for instance:


exchanges           1           2         3
volume               100        200      50
price                  10          12        8

Average bitcoin price 10
average bitcoin price by volume 10.87

This should work even better to break exchanges that try to be too cheap or too expensive compared to the world price.  This gives you a MTGox style price, but without the centralised exchange! Wink


Pages:
Jump to: