Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 390.

jamyr

sr. member

Activity: 1764

Merit: 373

<------

Quote from: kongosplit on December 30, 2016, 12:56:32 AM

Micro, about the 0.001 giveaway from facebook.

I saw I have received it but I can't remember when I was playing.

Is there any way where I can see a list of my ip's?

If you are looking for a proof that you received the giveaway since you said "about the 0.001 giveaway . .", you can find the list of tips you sent or received by clicking on accounts>transactions it is in the bottom part of the page.

kongosplit

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Micro, about the 0.001 giveaway from facebook.

I saw I have received it but I can't remember when I was playing.

Is there any way where I can see a list of my ip's?

Xanidas

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: Twilight Equinox on December 29, 2016, 07:50:29 PM

Sometimes the seed mess with you, you know? I went for x100 low, from base sat of 5 it reached 50k. Sad part is 17 of those rolls were above 99

It happens sometimes so its just pretty normal. Good thing for some people they understand provably fair system and they don't accuse the site rigging the bets like others when they got long losing streak or the other way around of their bets.

Happened to me everytime im going to 100x lol

kolloh

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1023

Quote from: Twilight Equinox on December 29, 2016, 07:50:29 PM

Sometimes the seed mess with you, you know? I went for x100 low, from base sat of 5 it reached 50k. Sad part is 17 of those rolls were above 99

Yeah, I hate when that happens. But if you were to try and switch to high after seeing those 99, you would likely end up missing a 0 lol. That's how it always seems to happen for me at least.

Twilight Equinox

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Sometimes the seed mess with you, you know? I went for x100 low, from base sat of 5 it reached 50k. Sad part is 17 of those rolls were above 99

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: panjul07 on December 29, 2016, 12:37:54 PM

Quote from: kongosplit on December 29, 2016, 12:20:16 PM

I'm pretty sure about 17x reds, 18xreds but 22x is to much for 2x.

Sounds too much but in fact 22x is still possible on x2, afaik there was a player get more than 30x on x2. My worst was 25x long time ago, so dont ever think that it is impossible. Every single roll is independent, when you are so unlucky then you will get something that you think is impossible.

Trust me 22x is very possible on x2 and its one of the largest losses I got about a year ago when I did martingale. I even had a small base bet like 500 or 1000 Sats or so and I didn't think going over 15x was possible but one day disaster stuck and had lost every BTC i had.

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: kongosplit on December 29, 2016, 12:20:16 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on December 29, 2016, 05:10:28 AM

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

Quote from: BTCevo on December 28, 2016, 07:14:02 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on December 28, 2016, 04:51:44 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 27, 2016, 06:35:00 PM

Looking at this photo which was posted yesterday, it doesn't look like a very smart way of gambling. He started at a base bet of 0.08 BTC and using payout 5.00x, and on every loss he kept doing regular martingale.

But since his wins have less than a 20% chance of every roll, then its not uncommon for him to run into a losing streak of 50 losses in a row. If he got 50 losses in a row, he would need the 50th bet to have a value of 88 Million BTC for him to be able to stay in the game, which is far higher than the max bet amount.

~

Sometimes I think that people who perform martingale do not bother to do the maths before starting. I'll try to do my best to explain how big your losses might be with the martingale strategy.

Even if your base bet is just 1 Satoshi your 50th bet would be over 11 Million BTC. If the base bet is 0.08 BTC then after 49 losses in a raw you'll need over 45 Trilllion BTC to make the next bet.

So be careful with that martingale thing, guys. )

There are no people that are stupid enough to do this kind of martingale though. May be for couple of btc they may be take that challenge but to play it for longer run? I dont think that they are going for it. Because there is max pyout on each gambling site so there is no point to bet that high amount if the site can't pay you up

Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

No, it's not impossible, that's what I was talking about, it's pretty possible and I will show you once again.

With the base bet 2,000 sats or 0.00002 BTC you just need to have 22 reds in a row to lose 50 BTC. Even if you are betting with 50% winning chance 22 reds in a row can happen, but with 20% winning chance it will happen more than likely pretty soon. Multiply 0.00002 BTC by 2 22 times and see for yourself.

I'm pretty sure about 17x reds, 18xreds but 22x is to much for 2x.

ahah, well if it was right no casino would exist because everyone would just save around 50 BTC or even more and then just gamble like that.

There is NO limit to the amount of identical results you can get in a row. You could have 100 reds in a row.
It won't happen often of course. But you only need to see it happening once to lose everything.

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: kongosplit on December 29, 2016, 12:20:16 PM

I'm pretty sure about 17x reds, 18xreds but 22x is to much for 2x.

Sounds too much but in fact 22x is still possible on x2, afaik there was a player get more than 30x on x2. My worst was 25x long time ago, so dont ever think that it is impossible. Every single roll is independent, when you are so unlucky then you will get something that you think is impossible.

kongosplit

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Betwrong on December 29, 2016, 05:10:28 AM

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

Quote from: BTCevo on December 28, 2016, 07:14:02 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on December 28, 2016, 04:51:44 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 27, 2016, 06:35:00 PM

Looking at this photo which was posted yesterday, it doesn't look like a very smart way of gambling. He started at a base bet of 0.08 BTC and using payout 5.00x, and on every loss he kept doing regular martingale.

But since his wins have less than a 20% chance of every roll, then its not uncommon for him to run into a losing streak of 50 losses in a row. If he got 50 losses in a row, he would need the 50th bet to have a value of 88 Million BTC for him to be able to stay in the game, which is far higher than the max bet amount.

~

Sometimes I think that people who perform martingale do not bother to do the maths before starting. I'll try to do my best to explain how big your losses might be with the martingale strategy.

Even if your base bet is just 1 Satoshi your 50th bet would be over 11 Million BTC. If the base bet is 0.08 BTC then after 49 losses in a raw you'll need over 45 Trilllion BTC to make the next bet.

So be careful with that martingale thing, guys. )

There are no people that are stupid enough to do this kind of martingale though. May be for couple of btc they may be take that challenge but to play it for longer run? I dont think that they are going for it. Because there is max pyout on each gambling site so there is no point to bet that high amount if the site can't pay you up

Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

No, it's not impossible, that's what I was talking about, it's pretty possible and I will show you once again.

With the base bet 2,000 sats or 0.00002 BTC you just need to have 22 reds in a row to lose 50 BTC. Even if you are betting with 50% winning chance 22 reds in a row can happen, but with 20% winning chance it will happen more than likely pretty soon. Multiply 0.00002 BTC by 2 22 times and see for yourself.

I'm pretty sure about 17x reds, 18xreds but 22x is to much for 2x.

Dank Frank

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Too Weird to Live. Too Rare to Die...

Quote from: Eremitos on December 29, 2016, 06:06:34 AM

Quote from: numanoid on December 28, 2016, 09:27:48 PM

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

~snip~
Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

Let me correct your words, Martingale is good if you aren't use it. What the hell you are so sure if you won't lose (almost impossible) when you use base bet 2k satoshis? If your bankroll is 50 btc, you just can handled 21 streak loses, it will cost you 41.94302000 BTC (you just only have 8 btc left). Get 21 streak loses isn't "almost impossible" to lose

Quote from: Eremitos on December 28, 2016, 08:29:15 PM

So, here is a story:
~snip~

Any valid proofs you have? Does it mean Ed trust gwapo112 since he was gave 0.05 directly to him?

Quote

He basically scammed whole PD community and for what?

if gwapo was asked to tip everyone with that 0.05 btc but he refused it, Yes, he's a scammer.

Quote

For petty 0.05. Unbelieveable.

Go to scam accusation and lending sections, you'll found there are so many people scammed/defaulted a loan below than 0.05 btc.

How about 20 witnesses on chat who saw that Edward tipped scammer gwapo and asked him to tip it out like the rest? How about scammer gwapo himself admitting he did get the tip but won't tip it, cause 'Edward scammed him before' (and he meant his total profit stats)? Is that enough for 'valid proof'?

Also, there is no point in making new thread that will be read by 10 ppl. Point is to make as much ppl aware of scammer gwapo as possible, so I posted it here.

Any further questions?

I can confirm your story, I just wonder why Ed thought he could trust gwapo to share the tips he shouldn't trust players to do so but just his own mods who always share it fairly with everyone. Tipping random players to tip the rest and rely on them to do what is right is kind of wrong.

Eremitos

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

Quote from: numanoid on December 28, 2016, 09:27:48 PM

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

~snip~
Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

Let me correct your words, Martingale is good if you aren't use it. What the hell you are so sure if you won't lose (almost impossible) when you use base bet 2k satoshis? If your bankroll is 50 btc, you just can handled 21 streak loses, it will cost you 41.94302000 BTC (you just only have 8 btc left). Get 21 streak loses isn't "almost impossible" to lose

Quote from: Eremitos on December 28, 2016, 08:29:15 PM

So, here is a story:
~snip~

Any valid proofs you have? Does it mean Ed trust gwapo112 since he was gave 0.05 directly to him?

Quote

He basically scammed whole PD community and for what?

if gwapo was asked to tip everyone with that 0.05 btc but he refused it, Yes, he's a scammer.

Quote

For petty 0.05. Unbelieveable.

Go to scam accusation and lending sections, you'll found there are so many people scammed/defaulted a loan below than 0.05 btc.

How about 20 witnesses on chat who saw that Edward tipped scammer gwapo and asked him to tip it out like the rest? How about scammer gwapo himself admitting he did get the tip but won't tip it, cause 'Edward scammed him before' (and he meant his total profit stats)? Is that enough for 'valid proof'?

Also, there is no point in making new thread that will be read by 10 ppl. Point is to make as much ppl aware of scammer gwapo as possible, so I posted it here.

Any further questions?

veleten

legendary

Activity: 2016

Merit: 1107

Quote from: Eremitos on December 28, 2016, 08:29:15 PM

So, here is a story:

Ed came to chat and tipped few players 0.05 each and asked them to tip it out. Everyone - iKerzyy, Milan944, helpmywallet and Isildur - did it, but gwapo112 took the money and refused to tip. Everyone told him to do it, but he acted as he usually act and that means insulted everyone. He basically scammed whole PD community and for what? For petty 0.05. Unbelieveable.

TBH I've never ever seen such shameless pussy without even a miligram of dignity. I truly hope gwapo will be redlisted forever, ignored by all, never ever get tip from anyone and - last but not least - I truly hope he will bust every single time he plays.

I'm posting it cause I think it is important for everyone to know what kind of person he is. And maybe Micro and Ed will come to some conclusions about it either.

I wasn't on at the time but it sounds like a thing gwapo would do
one of the most shameless beggars on PD,begging from multiple accounts
he doesn't care if he gets muted or ignored,he has plenty of different accounts to beg/leech faucet from

Betwrong

legendary

Activity: 3374

Merit: 2198

🌀 Cosmic Casino

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

Quote from: BTCevo on December 28, 2016, 07:14:02 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on December 28, 2016, 04:51:44 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 27, 2016, 06:35:00 PM

Looking at this photo which was posted yesterday, it doesn't look like a very smart way of gambling. He started at a base bet of 0.08 BTC and using payout 5.00x, and on every loss he kept doing regular martingale.

But since his wins have less than a 20% chance of every roll, then its not uncommon for him to run into a losing streak of 50 losses in a row. If he got 50 losses in a row, he would need the 50th bet to have a value of 88 Million BTC for him to be able to stay in the game, which is far higher than the max bet amount.

~

Sometimes I think that people who perform martingale do not bother to do the maths before starting. I'll try to do my best to explain how big your losses might be with the martingale strategy.

Even if your base bet is just 1 Satoshi your 50th bet would be over 11 Million BTC. If the base bet is 0.08 BTC then after 49 losses in a raw you'll need over 45 Trilllion BTC to make the next bet.

So be careful with that martingale thing, guys. )

There are no people that are stupid enough to do this kind of martingale though. May be for couple of btc they may be take that challenge but to play it for longer run? I dont think that they are going for it. Because there is max pyout on each gambling site so there is no point to bet that high amount if the site can't pay you up

Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

No, it's not impossible, that's what I was talking about, it's pretty possible and I will show you once again.

With the base bet 2,000 sats or 0.00002 BTC you just need to have 22 reds in a row to lose 50 BTC. Even if you are betting with 50% winning chance 22 reds in a row can happen, but with 20% winning chance it will happen more than likely pretty soon. Multiply 0.00002 BTC by 2 22 times and see for yourself.

BTCevo

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1008

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

Quote from: BTCevo on December 28, 2016, 07:14:02 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on December 28, 2016, 04:51:44 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 27, 2016, 06:35:00 PM

Looking at this photo which was posted yesterday, it doesn't look like a very smart way of gambling. He started at a base bet of 0.08 BTC and using payout 5.00x, and on every loss he kept doing regular martingale.

But since his wins have less than a 20% chance of every roll, then its not uncommon for him to run into a losing streak of 50 losses in a row. If he got 50 losses in a row, he would need the 50th bet to have a value of 88 Million BTC for him to be able to stay in the game, which is far higher than the max bet amount.

Sometimes I think that people who perform martingale do not bother to do the maths before starting. I'll try to do my best to explain how big your losses might be with the martingale strategy.

Even if your base bet is just 1 Satoshi your 50th bet would be over 11 Million BTC. If the base bet is 0.08 BTC then after 49 losses in a raw you'll need over 45 Trilllion BTC to make the next bet.

So be careful with that martingale thing, guys. )

There are no people that are stupid enough to do this kind of martingale though. May be for couple of btc they may be take that challenge but to play it for longer run? I dont think that they are going for it. Because there is max pyout on each gambling site so there is no point to bet that high amount if the site can't pay you up

Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

What is the point to have 50 btc but you use only 2k satoshi to play? All martingale is the same though, whether you use any of martingale strategy to play if you have no luck at all, you will sure busted. I just wondering who have this huge amount of btc that play for 2000 sat? Let me know if someone have use this kind of strat and win like a lot of money on any dice games

numanoid

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1148

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

~snip~
Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

Let me correct your words, Martingale is good if you aren't use it. What the hell you are so sure if you won't lose (almost impossible) when you use base bet 2k satoshis? If your bankroll is 50 btc, you just can handled 21 streak loses, it will cost you 41.94302000 BTC (you just only have 8 btc left). Get 21 streak loses isn't "almost impossible" to lose

Quote from: Eremitos on December 28, 2016, 08:29:15 PM

So, here is a story:
~snip~

Any valid proofs you have? Does it mean Ed trust gwapo112 since he was gave 0.05 directly to him?

Quote

He basically scammed whole PD community and for what?

if gwapo was asked to tip everyone with that 0.05 btc but he refused it, Yes, he's a scammer.

Quote

For petty 0.05. Unbelieveable.

Go to scam accusation and lending sections, you'll found there are so many people scammed/defaulted a loan below than 0.05 btc.

maku

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1000

Quote from: kongosplit on December 28, 2016, 07:22:24 PM

Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

You are completely wrong about martingale here. Even 50 BTC bankroll won't guarantee that you will win.
If you use it long enough you will encounter a losing streak making a huge loss effectively destroying all your progress and previous wins.
Statistics tell us that there is around 0.1% chance of losing a 50/50 bet more than nine times in a row, quite low, right?
But I know that most of martingale players starts very low - in your case 2000 satoshi and 1000 or 2000 or more bets are common.
With this amount of bets rolled you will be busted sooner or later, if you haven't already, it only means you didn't use martingale long enough.

Eremitos

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

So, here is a story:

Ed came to chat and tipped few players 0.05 each and asked them to tip it out. Everyone - iKerzyy, Milan944, helpmywallet and Isildur - did it, but gwapo112 took the money and refused to tip. Everyone told him to do it, but he acted as he usually act and that means insulted everyone. He basically scammed whole PD community and for what? For petty 0.05. Unbelieveable.

TBH I've never ever seen such shameless pussy without even a miligram of dignity. I truly hope gwapo will be redlisted forever, ignored by all, never ever get tip from anyone and - last but not least - I truly hope he will bust every single time he plays.

I'm posting it cause I think it is important for everyone to know what kind of person he is. And maybe Micro and Ed will come to some conclusions about it either.

kongosplit

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: BTCevo on December 28, 2016, 07:14:02 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on December 28, 2016, 04:51:44 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 27, 2016, 06:35:00 PM

Looking at this photo which was posted yesterday, it doesn't look like a very smart way of gambling. He started at a base bet of 0.08 BTC and using payout 5.00x, and on every loss he kept doing regular martingale.

But since his wins have less than a 20% chance of every roll, then its not uncommon for him to run into a losing streak of 50 losses in a row. If he got 50 losses in a row, he would need the 50th bet to have a value of 88 Million BTC for him to be able to stay in the game, which is far higher than the max bet amount.

Sometimes I think that people who perform martingale do not bother to do the maths before starting. I'll try to do my best to explain how big your losses might be with the martingale strategy.

Even if your base bet is just 1 Satoshi your 50th bet would be over 11 Million BTC. If the base bet is 0.08 BTC then after 49 losses in a raw you'll need over 45 Trilllion BTC to make the next bet.

So be careful with that martingale thing, guys. )

There are no people that are stupid enough to do this kind of martingale though. May be for couple of btc they may be take that challenge but to play it for longer run? I dont think that they are going for it. Because there is max pyout on each gambling site so there is no point to bet that high amount if the site can't pay you up

Martinagle is good if you have 50btc in your balance and your base bet is 2000 satoshi. It is almost impossible to lose.

BTCevo

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Betwrong on December 28, 2016, 04:51:44 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 27, 2016, 06:35:00 PM

Looking at this photo which was posted yesterday, it doesn't look like a very smart way of gambling. He started at a base bet of 0.08 BTC and using payout 5.00x, and on every loss he kept doing regular martingale.

But since his wins have less than a 20% chance of every roll, then its not uncommon for him to run into a losing streak of 50 losses in a row. If he got 50 losses in a row, he would need the 50th bet to have a value of 88 Million BTC for him to be able to stay in the game, which is far higher than the max bet amount.

Sometimes I think that people who perform martingale do not bother to do the maths before starting. I'll try to do my best to explain how big your losses might be with the martingale strategy.

Even if your base bet is just 1 Satoshi your 50th bet would be over 11 Million BTC. If the base bet is 0.08 BTC then after 49 losses in a raw you'll need over 45 Trilllion BTC to make the next bet.

So be careful with that martingale thing, guys. )

There are no people that are stupid enough to do this kind of martingale though. May be for couple of btc they may be take that challenge but to play it for longer run? I dont think that they are going for it. Because there is max pyout on each gambling site so there is no point to bet that high amount if the site can't pay you up

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: panjul07 on December 28, 2016, 01:55:35 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on December 28, 2016, 04:51:44 AM

Quote from: adaseb on December 27, 2016, 06:35:00 PM

Looking at this photo which was posted yesterday, it doesn't look like a very smart way of gambling. He started at a base bet of 0.08 BTC and using payout 5.00x, and on every loss he kept doing regular martingale.

But since his wins have less than a 20% chance of every roll, then its not uncommon for him to run into a losing streak of 50 losses in a row. If he got 50 losses in a row, he would need the 50th bet to have a value of 88 Million BTC for him to be able to stay in the game, which is far higher than the max bet amount.

Sometimes I think that people who perform martingale do not bother to do the maths before starting. I'll try to do my best to explain how big your losses might be with the martingale strategy.

Even if your base bet is just 1 Satoshi your 50th bet would be over 11 Million BTC. If the base bet is 0.08 BTC then after 49 losses in a raw you'll need over 45 Trilllion BTC to make the next bet.

So be careful with that martingale thing, guys. )

I do believe big gambler like him knows the worst scenario of martingale, and I believe he has set his bankroll wisely before starting martingale. Means that he is spending money that he can afford to lose.
Luckily he hit big after some rolls, but I'm not really sure what he did after that hit. Whether he stop and withdraw or started it again for more profit.

None of us know this guy personally or not. Who knows maybe he did have some strategy with his martingale or not. Or he could of been some 2009-2010 early Bitcoin adopter and has 1000 BTC to burn or waste.

Just because he is betting large amounts doesn't mean he is some professional gambler who knows what they are doing. There are alot of rich people that gamble and they do nothing but lose money.

Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 390. (Read 1989788 times)