Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 746.

gampher

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: joksim299 on October 12, 2015, 01:37:23 PM

Quote from: TriggerX on October 12, 2015, 01:13:25 PM

I sent a support ticket using the help on the website and within a day, support emailed back. I gave him the necessary information to log in and now I gained access back into my old account. If you are on this forum Mladen, thanks for your help!

I think Mladen = MICRO?

Support is great now, once seemed like an impossible mission.

probably yeas as micro was saying it n this thread of him losing the M and becoming an Admin...
however i too have an hacked account lets see if i can get it back.

joksim299

legendary

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1014

Bitdice is scam scam scammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Quote from: TriggerX on October 12, 2015, 01:13:25 PM

I sent a support ticket using the help on the website and within a day, support emailed back. I gave him the necessary information to log in and now I gained access back into my old account. If you are on this forum Mladen, thanks for your help!

I think Mladen = MICRO?

Support is great now, once seemed like an impossible mission.

hui

hero member

Activity: 516

Merit: 502

Quote from: TriggerX on October 12, 2015, 01:13:25 PM

I sent a support ticket using the help on the website and within a day, support emailed back. I gave him the necessary information to log in and now I gained access back into my old account. If you are on this forum Mladen, thanks for your help!

just a quick thanks, too - ticket answer time <20 minutes, problem solved! (and it wasn't even an easy one)

TriggerX

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

I sent a support ticket using the help on the website and within a day, support emailed back. I gave him the necessary information to log in and now I gained access back into my old account. If you are on this forum Mladen, thanks for your help!

freedomno1

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1094

Learning the troll avoidance button :)

Quote from: ndnh on October 12, 2015, 06:08:33 AM

Quote from: freedomno1 on October 12, 2015, 05:58:48 AM

So even at 98% the whole balance getting eaten 3 times out of 100 seems to be worth the risk with those multipliers

Unfortunately, no.

A 98% bet would only have a multiplier of 1.0102x. So with a rakeback of 0.05% would make its EV is still -0.95%. Not worth it (to make bets simply because it has rakeback, I mean)

Edit: lol. he was faster. Cheesy

Anyway, those who understand how house edge works will refrain from betting at 98% chance.
For a player who makes 50 bets, there will be 49 wins and 1 loss. That is a net loss of 0.5 BTC. While if you were playing at say 100x the other way, it would be around ~<0.01 BTC

It doesn't make sense unless you have some super positive EV wagering competition going on.

It might just be because I'm comparing it to betcoins dice game but I don't know their house edge
Assuming PD's 1% your right the EV would be to low to make it worthwhile.

And sorry should have been more clear meant its worth it for the house if the edge is there lol.

Nextgen

sr. member

Activity: 410

Merit: 250

Quote from: ndnh on October 12, 2015, 06:08:33 AM

A 98% bet would only have a multiplier of 1.0102x. So with a rakeback of 0.05% would make its EV is still -0.95%. Not worth it (to make bets simply because it has rakeback, I mean)

you are excluding the profit from the bet ?

Quote from: ndnh on October 12, 2015, 06:08:33 AM

Anyway, those who understand how house edge works will refrain from betting at 98% chance.
For a player who makes 50 bets, there will be 49 wins and 1 loss. That is a net loss of 0.5 BTC. While if you were playing at say 100x the other way, it would be around ~<0.01 BTC

It doesn't make sense unless you have some super positive EV wagering competition going on.

i am not that good at math but ,you should consider 100 bets for 98% and you are missing that one i guess ? but assuming whole advantage of 100x instead.

ndnh

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1005

New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit

Quote from: freedomno1 on October 12, 2015, 05:58:48 AM

So even at 98% the whole balance getting eaten 3 times out of 100 seems to be worth the risk with those multipliers

Unfortunately, no.

A 98% bet would only have a multiplier of 1.0102x. So with a rakeback of 0.05% would make its EV is still -0.95%. Not worth it (to make bets simply because it has rakeback, I mean)

Edit: lol. he was faster. Cheesy

Anyway, those who understand how house edge works will refrain from betting at 98% chance.
For a player who makes 50 bets, there will be 49 wins and 1 loss. That is a net loss of 0.5 BTC. While if you were playing at say 100x the other way, it would be around ~<0.01 BTC

It doesn't make sense unless you have some super positive EV wagering competition going on.

Inkvor

hero member

Activity: 553

Merit: 500

Quote from: freedomno1 on October 12, 2015, 05:58:48 AM

So even at 98% the whole balance getting eaten 3 times out of 100 seems to be worth the risk with those multipliers

worth risking for whom ? you are speaking on casino owners side I guess.. ?
however rolling some maxes at that percentage and that too without any pattern can get some nice wager to gamblers without much loses.

freedomno1

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1094

Learning the troll avoidance button :)

Quote from: freedomno1 on October 12, 2015, 04:54:39 AM

Assuming people are playing large enough amounts of Bitcoin it likely could be offset
Easy enough to have different levels of rewards based on player level to activate rakeback rates (or volume)

Quote from: Inkvor on October 12, 2015, 05:17:57 AM

Yes of course it requires some analysis and planning to do it ,however it could profit both gamblers and Stunna.
I mean you can do some fucking high bets at 98 % in between....

Well there are other sites that have dice rakeback that I am aware of but not sure on their house edge
Betcoin would be an example of one that runs a dice component with a 0.01 % rakeback initially but is highly volume dependent
So even at 98% the whole balance getting eaten 3 times out of 100 seems to be worth the risk with those multipliers

Inkvor

hero member

Activity: 553

Merit: 500

Quote from: justscrewit on October 12, 2015, 04:54:07 AM

Quote from: Inkvor on October 12, 2015, 04:41:03 AM

Quote from: yanka50 on October 12, 2015, 01:28:40 AM

rakeback or something.

+ 1 , rakeback is a pretty nice scheme for both the players and for stunna himself ,but I don't think it will be implemented ever.
as there could be many issues with people using bots etc..

Rakeback, if it is smaller than house edge, it still gives owner profit. Extra profit I may say, as people wager more, effectively losing more due to the edge.

yes ,so what did you understood from my point ?

Quote from: freedomno1 on October 12, 2015, 04:54:39 AM

Assuming people are playing large enough amounts of Bitcoin it likely could be offset
Easy enough to have different levels of rewards based on player level to activate rakeback rates (or volume)

Yes of course it requires some analysis and planning to do it ,however it could profit both gamblers and Stunna.
I mean you can do some fucking high bets at 98 % in between....

freedomno1

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1094

Learning the troll avoidance button :)

Quote from: Inkvor on October 12, 2015, 04:41:03 AM

Quote from: yanka50 on October 12, 2015, 01:28:40 AM

rakeback or something.

+ 1 , rakeback is a pretty nice scheme for both the players and for stunna himself ,but I don't think it will be implemented ever.
as there could be many issues with people using bots etc..

Assuming people are playing large enough amounts of Bitcoin it likely could be offset
Easy enough to have different levels of rewards based on player level to activate rakeback rates (or volume)

justscrewit

full member

Activity: 190

Merit: 100

Quote from: Inkvor on October 12, 2015, 04:41:03 AM

Quote from: yanka50 on October 12, 2015, 01:28:40 AM

rakeback or something.

+ 1 , rakeback is a pretty nice scheme for both the players and for stunna himself ,but I don't think it will be implemented ever.
as there could be many issues with people using bots etc..

Rakeback, if it is smaller than house edge, it still gives owner profit. Extra profit I may say, as people wager more, effectively losing more due to the edge.

Inkvor

hero member

Activity: 553

Merit: 500

Quote from: yanka50 on October 12, 2015, 01:28:40 AM

rakeback or something.

+ 1 , rakeback is a pretty nice scheme for both the players and for stunna himself ,but I don't think it will be implemented ever.
as there could be many issues with people using bots etc..

yanka50

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: Omikifuse on October 12, 2015, 02:39:03 AM

Quote from: yanka50 on October 12, 2015, 01:28:40 AM

Maybe you should get some kind of bonuses when you reach some wagered amount figure or some other motivation like rakeback or something.

you get bonus, a bigger faucet and a nice tittle name

other motivations are a good idea, but yet to be implemented

We both know that bigger faucet doesn't mean a thing Wink

. Nice title doesn't put food in my belly

So something to add to the your balance would be nice.

Omikifuse

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1009

Quote from: yanka50 on October 12, 2015, 01:28:40 AM

Maybe you should get some kind of bonuses when you reach some wagered amount figure or some other motivation like rakeback or something.

you get bonus, a bigger faucet and a nice tittle name

other motivations are a good idea, but yet to be implemented

yanka50

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Maybe you should get some kind of bonuses when you reach some wagered amount figure or some other motivation like rakeback or something.

Alicia96

member

Activity: 78

Merit: 10

Quote from: birdcat90 on October 11, 2015, 04:11:13 PM

Stunna i miss the jackpot in PD..

like before 77.77...but make it different...now almost all gambling site has jackpot and PD should consider one..

I think that would be an awesome addition to the site !

birdcat90

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Stunna i miss the jackpot in PD..

like before 77.77...but make it different...now almost all gambling site has jackpot and PD should consider one..

MICRO

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1037

Oldschool!

Quote from: redferrari on October 11, 2015, 02:54:35 PM

Quote from: MICRO on October 11, 2015, 12:15:56 PM

Quote from: Nextgen on October 11, 2015, 11:36:38 AM

Quote from: PrimeGlitch on October 11, 2015, 11:03:04 AM

That's a shame. Seems Like a good idea, I would of used this feature.

yes this is very surprising, i am hering PD support issues from years and i personally have been affected by this but i dont see any effort on improving it ?
but they analyse and see that pvp is not being used and removed it ?

What do you mean you don't see any effort of improving pd support? Last 3 weak's avg first reply time was under 4 hours. And its getting faster.
Only time you can wait up to 12 hours is during off hours. Since support is not 24/7 yet.

I think everybody who recently submitted ticket can confirm that. Most of them get answered in under 1 hour.

Thats BS, ive been on pd for years and they promised better support to many times to count. It NEVER got better, only time it did was when stunna personally replied to the support messages. Just a couple days ago I sent them a request on my alt and it took 4 days to get a response, not really that bad but wasnt anywhere near 4 hours.

What was your ticket number? I personally replied all tickets since i started doing support and none took more than 12hours for first reply.

There will be some rare cases where i cant solve ticket and need to forward it to other support staff and it might take just a little bit longer.

Mr.Puff

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Okay so long time user here on a new acc Cheesy

but vouch the ticket system works.. after being gone for 30 days micro can actually solve an issue now yay! I still think aton of the staff are shit but hey we can't fire edward.

Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 746. (Read 1990319 times)