Pages:
Author

Topic: Privacy Question - page 2. (Read 1544 times)

legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
April 06, 2015, 08:10:44 PM
#6
Generating a new address doesn't protect you from the addresses being linked together though.  As soon as you spend BTC from the wallet which generated the two address, they may be linked together.

Correct, if you generate a new address for EVERY transaction you ever receive, then when you spend BTC, it is possible that a few of those address will be linked together (though not necessarily all of them).  You can use a wallet that allows coin control to gain better control over exactly which addresses get linked together during the send.  You can improve your privacy substantially more if you use a "CoinJoin" system, where your inputs are blended with the inputs of other users in the same transaction.


If you are using multiple wallets, then you eliminate the chance that outputs received in one wallet will be used as inputs in the same transaction as outputs from one of the other wallets.  However, if you "regularly send BTC back and forth", then it may become clear that the owners of the two wallets have a VERY close personal relationship.  They may even be able to infer that it is the same person.

 
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1011
April 06, 2015, 06:34:45 PM
#5
Let's say I regularly send BTC back and forth between wallet #1 and wallet #2.  I'm receiving BTC and I don't want the sender to link me to wallet #1 and its transaction history.  Is my privacy increased at all by having him send to wallet #2 instead of wallet #1 or will I be linked to wallet #1 for sure no matter which wallet he sends to?

When you say "wallet", do you mean "address"?  I can't truly make sense of this question as written and this seems like the most natural fix.

If you do mean address then the answer is "yes".  No amount of sending back and forth between addresses conclusively proves that the addresses are controlled by the same person.  The sender (to whom you have revealed a link between yourself and address #2) will be unable to link you to address #1 with certainty.

Note that the corresponding gain in privacy may well be negligible.
copper member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
April 06, 2015, 06:08:06 PM
#4
you should be fine as long as you don't send btc from wallet #2 to wallet #1 too frequently. though if you want to be sure that you won't tracked, you can always use an exchange or a dice site to completely hide your track.

and multiple wallets "privacy" is not very different than multiple address.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
April 06, 2015, 06:00:55 PM
#3
Generating a new address doesn't protect you from the addresses being linked together though.  As soon as you spend BTC from the wallet which generated the two address, they may be linked together.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
April 06, 2015, 05:55:00 PM
#2
Let's say I regularly send BTC back and forth between wallet #1 and wallet #2.  I'm receiving BTC and I don't want the sender to link me to wallet #1 and its transaction history.  Is my privacy increased at all by having him send to wallet #2 instead of wallet #1 or will I be linked to wallet #1 for sure no matter which wallet he sends to?

A wallet may have several addresses. Maybe you mean address instead of wallet? Smiley

If you do, and if you send coins back and forth, address/wallet 1 will always be linked to 2 and vice versa. That's why you should always generate a new address for each payment!
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
April 06, 2015, 05:34:55 PM
#1
Let's say I regularly send BTC back and forth between wallet #1 and wallet #2.  I'm receiving BTC and I don't want the sender to link me to wallet #1 and its transaction history.  Is my privacy increased at all by having him send to wallet #2 instead of wallet #1 or will I be linked to wallet #1 for sure no matter which wallet he sends to?
Pages:
Jump to: