There was a need, I wondered, got an answer and changed my mind.
This isn't what happened. You are trying to prettify the facts.
Is this attitude to me because I live in Russia?
Sincerely this thought hasn't even strucked me. You're seeing attacks where there is none, really.
You are missing one important thing!
Because no one understands me!
Asking a question and receiving some kind of answer does not mean that the person has conceived a deception ...
~snip~
The sun will explode in a million years, and what? Now go to bed and die because of this assumption?
You really seem to have trouble to understand what is going on. Let me clarify the reason why this feedback will remain.
And the fact that I just asked! Wrote as is and waited for suggestions.
They explained to me that my request was not feasible, the question was closed.
So where did I earn bad trust?
Just asking a question that someone misinterpreted ??
Let's get the facts clear and reply to the points above.
The reason why this feedback will stay isn't
only about a completely insane loan request.
It is not "request was not feasible, question closed", as you brag all thread long.
You kept the question open and harassed me for 3 days, after I politely declined on the first day.
I have denied the loan to you on the 2nd of May 2017.
I misclicked and removed the above reply to it, but the quote of your loan request is still there.
On the next day, you replied the following :
I wrote that I will send you my trading strategies, there some indicators are more expensive and all together priceless.
Plus my documents and a receipt on the loan.
I do not come back on my decision : denied.
You still do not offer proper collateral.
Please check these threads :
-
The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan"-
EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN LENDING TO USERS!"Please submit a loan with a proper collateral.
That would be 3.2
BTC worth of a stable altcoin. (120% of loan amount)
If you don't have that, there's no point in begging to get a $3000 loan.
and on the day after that, this happened :
Sir, but I also have a trading account, where already 4160 dollars!
You should withdraw the money on that account and then use it.
I'm not giving you 2 satoshis.
By the way, your account doesn't qualify as a proper collateral :
What is not considered collateral?
[...]
- Most valuable online accounts can easily be recovered by social engineering (the user contacting support to say they were hacked, and regain control of the account) Examples: Steam
Please stop PMing me about this ! How many times do we need to say "denied" for you to understand ?
So .. I explained to you how this works, pointed you to threads so you can formalize your loan better. Did you read them ? Why do you offer something not considered a collateral then ?
Your following reply tells me you didn't read these threads.
And you kept pushing for a 2.7
BTC loan for two more days after the initial decline.
On top of that, you started PMing me about it. Stop. Just ... Stop !
Seriously that's harassing. What will it take for you to understand and stop ?
A few days ago, you PMed me to remove that feedback I left to you.
Shortly after the PM, you started posting on my escrow service thread :
I am available for escrow.
Hello yogg!
I wrote you a personal message, but it remained unanswered.
And the question is very important!
In the current situation, I can not even use your services, as people are confused by the Trust .... not to mention more.
So you know, even with your negative trust score, it is possible for you to use escrow services, and should be needed when you transact with someone.
I replied to your PM, and then replied to you on the thread. You then replied again on the thread, something that had only to do with the feedback that was left in 2017.
Your latest reply was reported and deleted because it was off topic.
Then you started this thread, which was a good idea, so you can understand once and for all why this feedback will stick, and advertised this thread later on in a thread, in Meta.
What will you do next ?
I don't think I misinterpreted anything.
My opinion is not only that you ask for insane amounts, but also that someone who engages in trading with you should be aware that you can be extremely insistent and intrusive, to say the least, without understanding the situation fully.
You have successfully demonstrated this in the current thread.
Here was a loan request. My legitimate questioning is : how is it when there's BTC involved ? What can happen if you
think you've been fooled ? This is up for speculations.
That's the reason why my factual feedback will remain.
You're not in prison, and you can continue to make your wallets and be recognized for that.
If there is someday a record of legit transactions between yourself and other users, and you understand what happened, I may remove the feedback, but given how you react in this thread, this won't be today.
You shouldn't setup fake ones, you'd be only fooling yourself..