if BLM truly cares so much about slavery, why is it just tearing down statues of slave traders and slave owners from centuries long ago.
why aren't they protesting against the current slavery in Africa. why so hypocritical?
why aren't they protesting against the current slavery in Africa. why so hypocritical?
Maybe it is because they live in America, not Africa? So they don't care about the slavery in Africa? And they don't have to?
Do you protest against the corruption that is happening in Saudi Arabia or I don't know, Russia?
Not that I agree with everything BLM says.
I don't really care. I don't have any black people around here, I don't live in America neither. (see my point?)
exactly they never burned a sudan flag in front of a sudan embassy, but tearing down white history figures thats what they love to do -> hyprocrits
Yabut, they are so poor that this is all they have to burn to keep warm. Besides, even Abraham Lincoln, one of our most celebrated presidents, favored Marxism.
Dishonest Abe Lincoln Was a Big Fan of Karl Marx, They Even Corresponded (Video)
A July 27, 2019 article in the Washington Post by Gillian Brockell was headlined, "You Know Who Was into Karl Marx? No, not AOC. Abraham Lincoln." Following up on the New York Times' 2017 weeks-long celebration of the centenary of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the Post was doing its part to celebrate and promote Marxian socialism by crowing that "the first Republican president . . . was surrounded by socialists and looked to them for counsel." The message being conveyed by the Post was that this is what all American presidents should do. They should listen to and obey the Washington Post, in other words.
Much of Lincoln's socialilstic "counsel" came from Horace Greeley's New York Tribune, described by the Post as "the newspaper largely responsible for transmitting the ideals and ideas that formed the Republican Party in 1854," many of which were "overtly socialist."
Much of Lincoln's socialilstic "counsel" came from Horace Greeley's New York Tribune, described by the Post as "the newspaper largely responsible for transmitting the ideals and ideas that formed the Republican Party in 1854," many of which were "overtly socialist."
A NEW CONSERVATIVE AGE IS RISING 