Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
i will skip gambling sites that force me to do this, for me it is very annoying if a gambling site requires me to give them my salary slip every month just so that i can play and make withdrawals there. remember that you are gambling with your own money, so use it as you please, even spending it is your own right. 
Topic: Proof Of Income Will This Pass (Read 812 times)
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
I mean why not? They should consider that you work even before you deposit on their gambling site and the one you deposit might either be from your savings. I think they will just check if it was really a close to your deposit for example you are ordinary employee with an average of $500 but you deposit $20,000 wouldn't that be a little bit sketchy? If you deposit around $2000-$5000 I think that could still be acceptable. 
I don't think casinos will ask for any such information. (Because they have nothing to do with how much your monthly income is and how much you are spending out of it on gambling)
But if they want to ask, at least it shouldn't be at the time of withdrawal. If they really want to know about their user's monthly income, they should ask at the time of registration so they can set a monthly limit for him that he can't exceed.
But if they want to ask, at least it shouldn't be at the time of withdrawal. If they really want to know about their user's monthly income, they should ask at the time of registration so they can set a monthly limit for him that he can't exceed.
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
Morally, the casino that did not ask you for proof of funds before accepting your deposit does not has the right to ask for proof of funds while withdrawing your money. Only that some casinos might be cunny, they might want to sit on the money, which is why they might be looking for excuses to make that possible.But if you could prove this with a $500 monthly income, they will highly likely not disturb you since all they care about is how money enters into their pocket, not really about the welfare of the gambler. This is unless they are under a strong regulator that has some rules about earning and gambling. And in cases like this, a better alternative should be sorted out.
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
First this is a very crazy scenario which can only happen 1) in the movies 2) if the government decides to take over the casino business. But then again it would be a terrible business model. Now let us assume that this is the case and everybody is okay with it, it will not violate the principle of gambling for fun because using all of your salary for gambling is the extreme of gambling problem/ addiction. 
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
i will skip gambling sites that force me to do this, for me it is very annoying if a gambling site requires me to give them my salary slip every month just so that i can play and make withdrawals there. remember that you are gambling with your own money, so use it as you please, even spending it is your own right. I want to ask first if there's a case before where a gambling site asks for proof of income. If yes, can you share it?
I think there's this thread in this section where stake asked the OP for proof of income.If that thing will be asked of me, that's already too much since the gambling site has nothing to do with our source of income as long as we were able to make deposits on their site legally. They supposed should not care about that part of our personal life.
I would have the same opinion that the casino shouldn't worry and think of what we do in our personal lives. But if it's written on their books that it's one document that they have to ask to someone that might have some activities that they detected to check, one has just to be obliged to comply.
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
Well it's hard to believe that you're using your whole salary for gambling. How about your other expenses? Are you going to rely on your gambling winnings to have such decision to gamble it all? Anyway, I don't think there's a casino who would care on where their players getting their money to deposit. Isn't it good for them that their players are consistently playing and spending their money on their platform? Because it's none of their business. But is this based on your own experience in a specific casino?They need to ensure that all the money that is being put on them are clean and doesn't came from illegal activities. I think this was also being ordered by the government so even if they like to cater all types of players to be able to earn more, they can't possibly do it. Earning small is better than not being able to operate and earn nothing at all.
When you had a job for the monthly income from some companies over a period of 2 years. Then the account was enroll as the salary account. So then if you withdraw the money from casino it was seems to be the funds from your salary. Even it may not from the income of salary, this case make to pass such things due to the old transaction. Then it became easy to withdraw the gambling money. No need to pay separate tax for this. It’s best way to use the salary account for the gambling site and to win. When the pass of bank account was approved, it’s essential one for the gambling withdraw money from it.
I think what casinos are looking for from proof of income is to check whether the player pays the right tax or not from their winning from the casino am sure casinos only ask for such documents when the player already has a history of past big wins and withdrawals.Maybe it's to see how much their salary is and whether the money is just for gambling or they keep most of their salary for other purposes.
If the casino sees the gambler using his salary solely for gambling, perhaps the casino can warn them to change their habits so the gambler doesn't lose more money.
But if you don't want to send proof of income, you don't need to play gambling using big money and play moderately.
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
I think they don't even have the right to prohibit you from gambling even though your money in gambling comes from your monthly salary, of course, this will be a bad habit if you play your monthly salary for gambling. But back to the point I mentioned (bold text). Then, I also wonder, on which site do you play? is this a physical casino? I also want to know more about this. But whatever it is, if what they are asking for is an obligation to withdraw money, like it or not you have to provide the data they ask for.
- You are right on this point that you are saying, maybe for the most part it is a bad method even if you didn't steal the money you earned. Even I honestly find it hard to believe that he is having a fixed amount of income from his gambling. I can believe that he earns a month but the fixed amount is unbelievable.
What I also don't understand is why a gambling casino needs to know that it is required to show proof of income, what does that have to do with a casino, this is the only casino that asks for proof of income first before you can gamble.
If you got your income together legally, then it shouldn't be a problem, right? I also don't think gambling sites have the right to go into much more detail about this. And then there, how is a gambling site going to check something like that? If they want to elaborate on that, it's usually a sign that you can't trust the site and that they're stretching things. Too bad, because it should only be for administration and not to perform all kinds of checks. After all, a gambling site has absolutely no power and authorization to carry out such checks.
They will have it if you let them. The moment you have given the document to their hands, it is also the moment you have given them the right to do further verification and checking to see whether these documents are up to standard and are not forged in any way. You'd be surprised on how agreeing to some terms of services extends the legal right of a gambling platform to a lot of things. That is why people should really think twice or thrice before checking that tick box on the ToS of every website/service/whatever it is that they are signing up for. They worded it well that you won't think there's anything wrong, when in reality you're giving them every right to go against your ass the moment you submit that document and checked the ToS.
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
Well it's hard to believe that you're using your whole salary for gambling. How about your other expenses? Are you going to rely on your gambling winnings to have such decision to gamble it all? Anyway, I don't think there's a casino who would care on where their players getting their money to deposit. Isn't it good for them that their players are consistently playing and spending their money on their platform? Because it's none of their business. But is this based on your own experience in a specific casino?After all they do not want to get in trouble themselves by allowing a person to gamble with funds they could have gotten through criminal activities, however other than that I do not think they care about the scenario the OP is worried about.
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
Well it's hard to believe that you're using your whole salary for gambling. How about your other expenses? Are you going to rely on your gambling winnings to have such decision to gamble it all? Anyway, I don't think there's a casino who would care on where their players getting their money to deposit. Isn't it good for them that their players are consistently playing and spending their money on their platform? Because it's none of their business. But is this based on your own experience in a specific casino? hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
We will never know because casinos can apply various things for the verification process and even ask for proof of our salary or income. But what if we don't have proof of salary but can make money from what we do?
But the casino will implement a verification process that doesn't burden its users because it can make users uncomfortable doing it. And hopefully, the casino will not ask many things for the verification of their members and will only use a basic verification.
The casinos doesn't need to follow the gamblers desire, but the gamblers are must following the casinos terms of services. They don't care if the requirements are really a lot and make the gamblers uncomfortable, the casinos will just freeze the funds and wait until the gamblers want to submit the whole KYC. Actually before you're want to use the service, you must to read the whole terms of services, this has been a warning when you're creating a new account.But the casino will implement a verification process that doesn't burden its users because it can make users uncomfortable doing it. And hopefully, the casino will not ask many things for the verification of their members and will only use a basic verification.
Just reading the terms is all we can do and if we don't like the casino's terms, we can look for another casino that may not have those requirements. We don't need to stay at the casino because many trusted casinos still make it easy for gamblers to play gambling and verify their accounts.
Speaking of principle, maybe the casino won't care, in fact, they are happy to see you put in more money.
But this introduces another problem, it's inadvertently relevant to AML rules. Casinos may force you to provide information on your other sources of income, casino judgment in general would not believe that you put all your salary into their platform with nothing left.
But this introduces another problem, it's inadvertently relevant to AML rules. Casinos may force you to provide information on your other sources of income, casino judgment in general would not believe that you put all your salary into their platform with nothing left.
I mean, of course any casino will be happy if their clients decided to deposit more money into their platforms, they are a business after all.
But about the proof of income, I have already stated in other occasions that casinos have no business telling people how to handle their money, actually it should not be decision from the casinos managers to suspect if someone is spending all the salary in gambling, there must be a law or a legislation that allows people to deposit how much they want as long as it coincides with the provided proof of income.
Speaking of principle, maybe the casino won't care, in fact, they are happy to see you put in more money.
But this introduces another problem, it's inadvertently relevant to AML rules. Casinos may force you to provide information on your other sources of income, casino judgment in general would not believe that you put all your salary into their platform with nothing left.
It would be difficult to believe for a casino that a person is putting all their money in their platform, however I do not think this is their problem, as long as you can prove that whatever amount of money you are depositing with them can be legally justified then that should be more than enough for them to conclude that you are not using funds coming from an illicit source or anything suspicious like that, since at the end of the day it is not their problem if you do in fact spend all your money with them. But this introduces another problem, it's inadvertently relevant to AML rules. Casinos may force you to provide information on your other sources of income, casino judgment in general would not believe that you put all your salary into their platform with nothing left.
Speaking of principle, maybe the casino won't care, in fact, they are happy to see you put in more money.
But this introduces another problem, it's inadvertently relevant to AML rules. Casinos may force you to provide information on your other sources of income, casino judgment in general would not believe that you put all your salary into their platform with nothing left.
But this introduces another problem, it's inadvertently relevant to AML rules. Casinos may force you to provide information on your other sources of income, casino judgment in general would not believe that you put all your salary into their platform with nothing left.
I'm curious which countries actually demand this, and not so sure I actually think it's a bad thing. Personally I lean more on the side of lesser government, more of a libertarian type-ish when it comes to government rules and regulations, but I think this could actually promote good gambling habits. That being said, I wouldn't want to deal with it and would certainly try and use ways around it if possible.
What's the reason for this? Doesn't this sound funny?
Or maybe this is just one of their ways to make it difficult for users to make withdrawals? If this happens, isn't this really crossing the boundaries of our privacy, especially since this is a gambling platform? This is my first time hearing about that. If it's related to KYC, maybe KYC is often done, but usually, it's enough to provide data or more, that's our ID, right? It seems like they are a financial evaluator institution
Or maybe this is just one of their ways to make it difficult for users to make withdrawals? If this happens, isn't this really crossing the boundaries of our privacy, especially since this is a gambling platform? This is my first time hearing about that. If it's related to KYC, maybe KYC is often done, but usually, it's enough to provide data or more, that's our ID, right? It seems like they are a financial evaluator institution
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
They will definitely accept that but not if you're salary is only $500 a month and you deposit $500 weekly that would make it questionable and the casino will ask you for more proof of income not only on your salary but other documents that will prove that you can sustain your bankroll and you are not working just to gamble, even if you're living with your parents there should be right allocation on all your basic needs.
Jump to: