Topic: Proposal: Adding grey underline in every links (Read 546 times)

If you can't even see the link because it's hidden somewhere in the post, it's unlikely you would even click on it. How would it even happen? You would have to click on every word, character, and empty space to find the hidden hyperlink. No one does that.

If Bitcointalk had some sort of database with known phishing links, it would need to be a work in progress that has to be constantly updated and maintained by someone. Hackers, scammers, and thieves aren't resting and are creating new sites and ways to attack people daily. If the forum banned sites 1-100, they can just create new ones.

Besides, there already is some sort of script that recognizes unwanted links and domains. I have seen links being broken with the message "suspicious link removed". 

i was just looking for some risks and possible threat to someone's btt profile ! i found this! as an android user (not sure about ios devices) it's so much hard to identify the difference! I don't use the btt often so it's so much hard for me to detect! is there any solution to this? like filtering out the phishing site and ban them from btt? so that no one could use that link in btt forum and get a warning for using them

Adhoc links or hyper-text-links is one forum programming that I like. You know, it states the links subject simply and it can be easily used in a way that, it blends with the sentence structure although yeah, as proposed by OP, it could be used to do some damages. Scammers who are phishing for whatever details are fully aware that, one is likely not to click on a suspicious link and as such would just go for an alternative in making a harmful link seem harmless by making it click bate and forum related enough to make users loose therr gaurd. I once saw a user whom reported right here in meta of an attempt by some other user to pish for his login details using adhoc or hyper text links through a pm.

I understand the scenario your trying to relate here, in relating to the fact that, the probability of users falling victim by clicking a hyper texted link within a wall of text is less than that of a link being simply stated out and that's true. That's really true but even at that, if we are to take a look at the operation of most ads these days, the 'x' and '>' symbols along with others have been known to skip the ads or pass and somehow, these guys have input that in there programming while the count down is still reading with the skip icon yet to be displayed. Where your attempt to skip ends up being you, clicking the redirecting page itself. Like, a whole page serving as a link. Same guys for the forum too. Some serious user might use his or her whole text as an adhoc link and your little attempt to keep your device brightness on by just clicking or taping your device screen, ends you in a redirecting pathway.

User awareness and caution is so exhausting to manage. What about a welcome message, though?

What's with people asking for more and more restrictions all the time? Eddie13 sums it up nicely:
There are thousands of websites that restrict their users in all possible ways. I don't know any site that offers the same freedom as Bitcointalk. Cherish it, instead of trying to turn it into all the other sites.

Don't forget the forum's mission:
If your safety depends on the color of a link on the internet, maybe the internet isn't for you.

In my opinion, This is more dangerous than OP mentioned. If I hover over the link, I know I can see the original link on your screen's bottom-left corner. But, This is another easy way to make people fool.

---

Another change can prevent it. If theymos put some restriction/limit on it, like signature space, It can be prevented. If I am not wrong, Only Legendary members' signatures space can use the background color. He can put some restrictions on coloring URLs, too (In my opinion, Coloring URLs should not be allowed for anyone) like Signature space. Still, I believe your suggestion is easier to implement.

If this gets implemented, I'd appreciate a "don't ask me again" checkbox. Kinda like the "delete post" button: if I click it normally, there's a popup, but if I click it with my middle mouse button (to open in a new tab), it doesn't ask me anything and just deletes the post.

Maybe. But don't forget that signature space is limited. Chances are that most of that character space is already lost because of the sig you are wearing, so you won't be able to do much with what remains. One way around it is if a Hero/Legendary would wear a sig for a Member/Full Member, which leaves him with enough room to include other things in his signature space.

Good campaign managers surely check if there are additional lines and entries in the signature that shouldn't be there. It's against the rules to have that.
Here is just one example:

 

+1
I thought about this immediately after reading OP. The essence of spreading phishing links is to have victims click on it as many times as possible or as fast as possible.
Phishing links I know are not invisible traps set and waiting to catch even if one person in one year. Phishing sites come with some baits to enable it catch many victims within a short possible time.
Hiding a Phishing link with the forum background color will yield no much results because I don't see myself clicking every word or blank spaces.
This will work unless there is a kind of SEO optimisation the spreader wants through the link. Does it really work that way?
If yes, that means one can be wearing signature of a company and still be promoting his personal signature through hiding links.

Exactly. On mobile platforms you can accidentally activate hidden links upon random tapping on blank spaces. That's a lot easier to abuse than on a desktop computer. But this is unfortunately true for all websites as well.

I personally support the idea of having a notification or pop-up for all external links on the forum.

Totally support this, I access Bitcointalk mostly with a mobile phone and I can testify that there are times when I want to scroll and I mistakenly touch a link and it opens right away without any kind or form of warning, and when this happens, I have to press the back button to return back to the page I was before.
There are times too when If I want to zoom the content of the page to enable me see the words clearly, the above happens too.

Introducing a pop up warning notification before opening a link will be really helpful, I believe this won't be to difficult to implement since we already since we already have a similar pop up whenever we click the "watch" topic or "unwatch" topic button, similar pop up can be built to come up when links are clicked too.

I'm not sure how easy or practical this would be, but one way I can see this done is if a user creates a phishing link hidden in the post which will redirect to a fake forum log in page. If a users clicks on a link deliberately to take them there, they would be fairly certain it's a phishing link, but if they do not do so and just get redirected, that could be mistaken as a forum pop up which wants to confirm their password.

Regular members should easily spot this, but I wouldn't know for those who've not been here for a while.

It sounds a nice proposal to improve the interface of the forum for hyperlinks in particular.

However, you should know an important point that the forum is run on SMF software that is difficult to make improvement with coding and some requirement can be impossible with SMS. It is what theymos said when people ask about the Epochtalk development progress (new forum software childboard) and in the meantime, ask for changes in this forum.

I think your request can be done by theymos because he does it for Merit (green highlight) so he can do the same for hyperlink.

But you can ask BPIP team (suchmoon ie.) to add it into their BPIP extension.

• Quote locked threads, 120-day merit total, custom themes, and other good stuff

So it appears the OP has found a way to hide the fact that there is a link within a post.

If all links were to look a certain way, someone could simply format their post to hide any links in their post. Although, forcing a link to look a certain way would make any hidden links stand out more.

I think the main reason why someone would want to hide the fact they are posting a link is for black-hat search result reasons (aka backlink spam). However much of the backlink spam is already more or less nonsense and these types of spammers do not need their posts to be up for very long.

Using this to spread phishing or malware links isn't really the best way to do it. Think about it. If you wanted to share something malicious, your goal is to have as many people click on that link as possible. You can't click on something you don't even know is there and if you don't even see it unless you come across it by mistake like when quoting a post the way you did.

But the possibility to take advantage of it is definitely there and if theymos can quickly fix that, I hope he does.

+1
Only for external links though. There is no need for that if the link redirects you to a different forum post.

Use Report to moderator. In this case, because there's only one post with a spam link, I typed:
The harm is done by spambots that create many accounts to spam useless posts for backlinks.

I don't see how this can easily be abused for phishing. That's much easier by using a fake visible link: google.com.

There was a time when every HTML link in the internet was blue underlined. Those were the days
Most sites remove it because it looks better without all the bling.

Quite surprising how after a decade, this proposal has been made just now. Though it's really funny how people (I'm guessing blogging beginners) who do this loophole or "trick" as if it actually helps them SEO-wise, because it really doesn't. Especially knowing that a lot of the links that these people spam here aren't even bitcoin/crypto related to start with.

No it doesn't work, either green or blue URLs will be changed to forum's background color. So you can't differentiate the URLs is Bitcointalk URLs or non Bitcointalk URLs.
Anyway thanks for the info.

I agree with your suggestion, however the cons of this feature is you need to spend more time to click "yes or no" option, some people might doesn't want it. Perhaps, it's can be an optional feature whether the user want to active it or not, I guess.

As far as i remember theymos had made a bitcointalk related URLs hovered with green color same with the underlined thing on the link. All non bitcointalk-related URLs are just ordinary either they put colors in it or not.
That feature is made to differentiate links and same with your reasons to avoid getting malware, phishing links and even scams. Accessing anything that is NON bitcointalk-related URLs are considered as risky and might steal device data and etc.
So its up to the user if he will proceed to access the URL or not since we can hovered it before clicking it.

Edit: Heres the thread of theymos im referring to https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/green-hover-color-for-bitcointalkorg-links-1432118

This is a very good catch and just thinking of it, I can see so many ways this "bug" can be exploited and used to scam or steal accounts. Would not post them, as not to give anyone ideas, but a certain tag should be added so hyperlinks would be distinguished from the rear of the post.

Also, would it be possible to have a notification before opening links, sort of "are you sure you want to b redirected to..."
This would prevent inadvertently clicking on links, especially when you're on mobile.