Pages:
Author

Topic: Proposing new feature in Bitcoin protocol to reduce the number of thefts (Read 6948 times)

legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4615
doesnt the bitcoin script already support timelocked outputs?

Not that I know of.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
doesnt the bitcoin script already support timelocked outputs?
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 250
14nm Bitcoin ASIC

We are still heavily involved in the 14nm ASIC project.
We are happy to report that after bringing on board more talent we have exceeded our initial 0.3W/Ghash target by 4.3 times by employing all techniques possible in ASIC and algorithm design. Our current design efficiency is now 70mW/Ghash (0.07W/Ghash) which allows us to build a 1 Terrahash chip in a single die while using 70 Watts at chip level. This will allow development of a 20Thash machine while using 1.5kw.
We intend to make this chip available for sale only from stock (No pre-orders)

Here, let me correct some mistakes you made in your post.

28nm Bitcoin ASIC

We are still heavily involved in the 28nm ASIC preorder scam.
We are unhappy to report that after bringing on board more fictitious third part manufacturers we have exceeded our initial delivery date by 6 months or 4.3 times by employing all excuses possible in ASIC and bitcoin miner development. Our current design efficiency is now 0.49/GH/s (according to our computer model) which allows us to build a 1 Terrahash unit that may or may not burn your sleeping children to death. This will allow you to mine your own bitcoins for a monthly loss of just $174.
We intend to make this chip available for sale only from stock (No pre-orders) the same way you can still purchase a non-existent X-3 from our website that is displaying IN STOCK with a shipping date of May 15 2014
full member
Activity: 474
Merit: 111
Can't switch on the timelock feature as it would open up bitcoin to having to handle transactions that might not mature for a very long time.   
jr. member
Activity: 34
Merit: 5
This thread is not a serious thread about any sort of protocol recommendation, frankly what they're describing is so misguided and ridiculous, it's not even "wrong".

The OP is a wire fraud criminal who fled Romania for the UK in the mid/early-2000's to avoid prosecution, and is currently running a scam with the Black Arrow Prospero line of pre-ordered miners to the tune of several million dollars of customer funds.

Black Arrow did not actually cash out any customer payments made upwards of a year ago until mysteriously finally moving them from the original payment addresses exactly when this thread was created, which indicates that this entire thread is merely a cover for embezzling the entirety of their customer's payments that were performed in bitcoin.

Well well... I was wondering for some times what action should I take... I now know and have no trust in BA left: I'll file a complaint with the Hong Kong Consumer Council.

Does anyone knows if "group complaint" can be made under HK law? Or does it have to be individual claims only?
hero member
Activity: 667
Merit: 500
This thread is not a serious thread about any sort of protocol recommendation, frankly what they're describing is so misguided and ridiculous, it's not even "wrong".

The OP is a wire fraud criminal who fled Romania for the UK in the mid/early-2000's to avoid prosecution, and is currently running a scam with the Black Arrow Prospero line of pre-ordered miners to the tune of several million dollars of customer funds.

Black Arrow did not actually cash out any customer payments made upwards of a year ago until mysteriously finally moving them from the original payment addresses exactly when this thread was created, which indicates that this entire thread is merely a cover for embezzling the entirety of their customer's payments that were performed in bitcoin.
hero member
Activity: 510
Merit: 500
So, we would like to propose this feature to be added to Bitcoin protocol:

A "Time Lock" command for Bitcoin addresses.
Are you aware that Bitcoin addresses do not exist on the blockchain or in the protocol?

And that "addresses" are not spent, "outputs" are.

And that transactions don't have timestamps?

And that the timestamp on a block is unreliable as an indication of current real-world calendar time?

And that the change you are proposing would require so much modification to the way the protocol works that it would likely destroy the consensus system and the fungible nature of bitcoins?


The Bitcoin addresses are not in the blockchain directly but it is easy to calculate the addresses from Blockchain data so that seems to be a non-issue.  Also, I thought the timestamps on the blocks that contain confirmed transactions was a good estimate of the time.  I thought blocks won't propagate unless they are within a couple of hours of the average time of other blocks that were recently published.  I also thought this capability already exists as part of P2SH.  This sounds like a variation of the "dead man's switch."  I thought these types of transactions are possible today as long as you can a miner to mine that type of transaction.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
It would only be vigilantism if someone stolen them to avenge the victims of black arrows incompetence and negligence, I've not seen any convincing evidence that theft is actually the case yet. Although that would be better than the alternative.

Even though time passes and does not comfort my feelings it do not feel stolen (yet) and still want to believe BA will offer proper compensation at some point in time.

I personally think BA does have a real crap supply chain, vendor management and customer service...
They have proven (more than once) not being able to maintain a proper/realistic production schedule.
They have proven not being able to get what they require from their vendors
They have proven not being able to offer what they stated to their customers

It looks like I (amateur miner/developer) would start tomorrow an bitcoin mining ASCI company a promise delivery within 6 month, with off course no experienced team nor established vendor relationship.

This would have been a (meant) scam, I assume we'd not hear about BA anymore with their founder enjoying a pile of dollars somewhere on a sunny island.... But we still hear and read about them (mainly not in a positive manner though).

To make it short, I think/assume:
1. BA realized about supply chain management early 2014 - too late
2. BA realized about vendor management mid 2014 - much too late
3. Consequently, BA faced reliability issue on their X3 unit putting even more pressure on their (nonexistent) supply chain management
4. Consequently again, BA faces customer anger for defect product and delayed delivery putting even more pressure on their (nonexistent) customer service

Since I still trust BA has good will, I think it is a wise decision to continue with new product development since only next gen units could now fairly compensate customers. Refunding/financial compensation would just kill the company in my opinion and vigilantism by stilling from them would only benefit to the theft (BA customer would probably never see a single satoshi of such a theft)

For the history, I have ordered two X1 units back in November '13 and received them functional (without LCD and WiFi) late July '14. Units are working perfectly since then.
Now required from BA a free "X1 14 nm" as compensation, which they said they'd investigate...


This BA pre-order has been scam from the beginning same as BFL and all the others. The guys who run these operations are career criminals.

The fact is that BA lied to get my money, never delivered any product and is not refunding me.
jr. member
Activity: 34
Merit: 5
It would only be vigilantism if someone stolen them to avenge the victims of black arrows incompetence and negligence, I've not seen any convincing evidence that theft is actually the case yet. Although that would be better than the alternative.

Even though time passes and does not comfort my feelings it do not feel stolen (yet) and still want to believe BA will offer proper compensation at some point in time.

I personally think BA does have a real crap supply chain, vendor management and customer service...
They have proven (more than once) not being able to maintain a proper/realistic production schedule.
They have proven not being able to get what they require from their vendors
They have proven not being able to offer what they stated to their customers

It looks like I (amateur miner/developer) would start tomorrow an bitcoin mining ASCI company a promise delivery within 6 month, with off course no experienced team nor established vendor relationship.

This would have been a (meant) scam, I assume we'd not hear about BA anymore with their founder enjoying a pile of dollars somewhere on a sunny island.... But we still hear and read about them (mainly not in a positive manner though).

To make it short, I think/assume:
1. BA realized about supply chain management early 2014 - too late
2. BA realized about vendor management mid 2014 - much too late
3. Consequently, BA faced reliability issue on their X3 unit putting even more pressure on their (nonexistent) supply chain management
4. Consequently again, BA faces customer anger for defect product and delayed delivery putting even more pressure on their (nonexistent) customer service

Since I still trust BA has good will, I think it is a wise decision to continue with new product development since only next gen units could now fairly compensate customers. Refunding/financial compensation would just kill the company in my opinion and vigilantism by stilling from them would only benefit to the theft (BA customer would probably never see a single satoshi of such a theft)

For the history, I have ordered two X1 units back in November '13 and received them functional (without LCD and WiFi) late July '14. Units are working perfectly since then.
Now required from BA a free "X1 14 nm" as compensation, which they said they'd investigate...
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
Scam-Busting PSA: Beware of Black Arrow Software
One of my favorite threads in recent memory. Nothing like some good old fashioned community vigilantism!

It would only be vigilantism if someone stolen them to avenge the victims of black arrows incompetence and negligence, I've not seen any convincing evidence that theft is actually the case yet. Although that would be better than the alternative.
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
One of my favorite threads in recent memory. Nothing like some good old fashioned community vigilantism!
sr. member
Activity: 459
Merit: 250
Instead, why don't you propose a system where after you manufacture bitcoin mining hardware with customer preorder money, you deliver it to your customers in the advertised time period, with the advertised compensation plans, with the advertised quality.

+1

Cannot say that better!

Was I was wondering for some time if I was reading correctly?! BA talking about bitcoin protocol?!?
Nothing else better to do at the moment?!?!?!?  Un-fu****-believable...


They're still looking for suckers investors to finance their 14nm SHA256 ASIC and scrypt ASIC chip development.

Oh yeah, and frantically searching for new excuses as to why they're still not shipping.
jr. member
Activity: 34
Merit: 5
Instead, why don't you propose a system where after you manufacture bitcoin mining hardware with customer preorder money, you deliver it to your customers in the advertised time period, with the advertised compensation plans, with the advertised quality.

+1

Cannot say that better!

I was wondering for some time if I was reading correctly?! BA talking about bitcoin protocol?!?
Nothing else better to do at the moment?!?!?!?  Un-fu****-believable...

hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
So, we would like to propose this feature to be added to Bitcoin protocol:

A "Time Lock" command for Bitcoin addresses.
Are you aware that Bitcoin addresses do not exist on the blockchain or in the protocol?

And that "addresses" are not spent, "outputs" are.

And that transactions don't have timestamps?

And that the timestamp on a block is unreliable as an indication of current real-world calendar time?

And that the change you are proposing would require so much modification to the way the protocol works that it would likely destroy the consensus system and the fungible nature of bitcoins?


Are you aware that 10% of the bitcoins in circulation are currently stolen?

Are we going to do anything about it?


Yes we are Alex Sovu, by exposing your ass for stealing millions of dollars due to non-deliveries of your Black Arrow pieces of shit.

I was wondering when Gleb was going to show up!.. good job, keep at it..
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
So, we would like to propose this feature to be added to Bitcoin protocol:

A "Time Lock" command for Bitcoin addresses.
Are you aware that Bitcoin addresses do not exist on the blockchain or in the protocol?

And that "addresses" are not spent, "outputs" are.

And that transactions don't have timestamps?

And that the timestamp on a block is unreliable as an indication of current real-world calendar time?

And that the change you are proposing would require so much modification to the way the protocol works that it would likely destroy the consensus system and the fungible nature of bitcoins?


Are you aware that 10% of the bitcoins in circulation are currently stolen?

Are we going to do anything about it?


Yes we are Alex Sovu, by exposing your ass for stealing millions of dollars due to non-deliveries of your Black Arrow pieces of shit.
hero member
Activity: 667
Merit: 500
So, we would like to propose this feature to be added to Bitcoin protocol:

A "Time Lock" command for Bitcoin addresses.
Are you aware that Bitcoin addresses do not exist on the blockchain or in the protocol?

And that "addresses" are not spent, "outputs" are.

And that transactions don't have timestamps?

And that the timestamp on a block is unreliable as an indication of current real-world calendar time?

And that the change you are proposing would require so much modification to the way the protocol works that it would likely destroy the consensus system and the fungible nature of bitcoins?


Are you aware that 10% of the bitcoins in circulation are currently stolen?

Are we going to do anything about it?


One obvious first step is suing the hell out of you for stealing millions of dollars from your mining customers.
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 250
If you have purchased any equipment from Black Arrow Software, here is how to file a complaint with the Hong Kong Consumer Council

The company is registered in Hong Kong, so the proper agency from what I have been able to find out so far is the Hong Kong Consumer Council.

They request some documents and need to establish that this is a Hong Kong registered company before they will agree to pick it up, therefore:

Send the annual report http://www.filedropper.com/ps30001577654901 along with the documents they have requested. Those documents are:

1. The invoice showing you paid
2 your bank or payment records showing the payment
3. any e-mail or support discussions you've had
4. The annual report referenced above.

Here's the link to file a complaint if you decide you want to do that.

https://www.consumer.org.hk/cc-complaint/index.php?lang=en

Also indicate that their TOS indicates Hong Kong law.

15.2 Applicable law and dispute resolution
16.2 1 This Agreement shall be interpreted and applied in accordance with the law of Hong Kong S.A.R. of PRC.


Black Arrow LTD
Room 1701, 17/F, Henan Building, No. 90-92
Jaffe Road
Wanchai, N/A
Hong Kong
PHONE: +852 8199 0849

Other forum users who are in on the scam.
Lexx2k
David105396
Bobsag3
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Anyone who has bitcoins tied up with black arrow, check to see if those coins are still sitting in the original wallet you sent them to, or if they've been 'stolen' like BA is trying to make it seem.

Also, just for fun, since this isn't a self-moderated thread:

Alexandru Ion Sovu is a Romanian scammer running a fraud of a business by the name of Black Arrow.
Find their personal info here:
http://www.kiwi.nz/blackarrow/
https://www.facebook.com/alex27a
Dukesbridge House, 23 Duke Street, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 4SA
cardreaderfactory.com
http://companycheck.co.uk/director/914928330
http://black-arrow-information-technology-shenzhen-co.imexbb.com
http://alexsovu.blogspot.com
Pages:
Jump to: