Pages:
Author

Topic: Prosecution’s case against Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse ... BLOWN up (Read 502 times)

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Can you see how the Rittenhouse verdict may have consequences here?

What's funny is the these pollsters will never ask politically inconvenient questions because they're afraid of the left wing mob. Are you aware of the damage that BLM terrorists have done during 2020 to American cities because George Floyd died of a fentanyl induced heart attack?

Well, let's dive into that question starting where the events took place -- 550 million alone in Minneapolis.

https://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-foundation-raising-20-million-to-rebuild-small-businesses-hurt-in-2020-riots/600058520/

Quote
Private insurance has been estimated at covering only about half the estimated $550 million in damage to businesses disproportionately owned by small operators, many of them immigrants and people of color.

Were these right wing Trump supporters that did this?

The J6 attacks, or "insurrection" as it is called, were a bunch of toothless Trump supporters from Alabama armed with MAGA hats and selfie sticks trespassing on the Capitol building. Absolutely terrifying.

Back on planet Earth there's video of George Flloyd being murdered.  The cop that murdered him was convicted of murder and is now in prison.

There's video of the Jan 6th attack, you can watch the people beating the shit out of the cops and breaking into the Capital during a joint session of congress. 

Since then we've learned a bunch of them said they were hoping to have the chance to kill various democrats before traveling from all over the country to Washington and breaking into the capital with deadly weapons.  Afterwards, many of them confirmed that they would have killed various Democrats had they been given the chance.

I dare you to contemplate how you would react to a BLM protest during the Certification of a Trump victory that turned into a violent attack on the capital where they beat the shit out of a bunch of cops and ransacked a bunch of republicans private offices.

Now imagine that there's evidence that a bunch of black guys said they couldn't wait to kill Kevin McCarthy before breaking into the capital with guns.

Now imagine that after the attack, the black guys told authorities that if they would have found Kevin McCarthy on the day of the attack, they would have killed him.

Now imagine what you would say to me if I said "The J6 attacks, or "insurrection" as it is called, were a bunch of toothless Biden supporters armed with Biden hats and selfie sticks trespassing on the Capitol building. Absolutely terrifying."



legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
What if there were irregularities similar to those exhibited in Sandy Hook (green screen and child actors)?

what if you have watched too much alex jones and have no sense of reality..
.. well its not a what if.. because you seem to have watched too much alex jones and been brainwashed into conspiracy cultish thoughts....

Alex Jones said initially that Sandy Hook was 'real' and as the corp/gov media was reporting.  I know because I tuned in for a minute or two to see what he was saying right when the psy-op was going down.

Alex Jones says the same thing today also last I heard, but generally doesn't like to talk about it much.

Interesting to see that you, franky1, are such an Alex Jones fan and that there is so much common ground between your respective positions.  Have you tried his boner pills?

legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
What if there were irregularities similar to those exhibited in Sandy Hook (green screen and child actors)?

what if you have watched too much alex jones and have no sense of reality..
.. well its not a what if.. because you seem to have watched too much alex jones and been brainwashed into conspiracy cultish thoughts.

try to take a few weeks to clear your head of the theories of "what if" and come back to reality. actually think about real life. real things and stop thinking everything is some fantasy tv show
member
Activity: 478
Merit: 66
What if the Rittenhouse trial had psychological propaganda outside of the lay form of racial theorem placed upon the masses? What if there were irregularities similar to those exhibited in Sandy Hook (green screen and child actors)? And all this trial was merely for a rights grab of second amendment defense.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PWc3oVMS6Wfr/

And what does China have to say about this?


Rittenhouse case ‘exposes illness of US political system’

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202111/1239555.shtml
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
Kraken attorney adjacent Lin Wood withheld bail money for Kyle Rittenhouse, she wanted to keep him in jail so she could profit. She was also the one peddling election lies trying to profit from foolish right wing nutjobs. If someone tells you something you want to here, and then asks you for money, it doesn't take much common sense to realize they're grifters. Unfortunately, there's a lot of money to be made in the political world from stupid people. But that's generally how people get elected anyways, because a vote doesn't cost anything. And they're no refunds.

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1462955974071926790
copper member
Activity: 155
Merit: 8
1. rittenhouse was underage and shouldnt have had a gun
2. a business called him to protect a dealership. pfft. any mature adult would not phone a kid with no security experience to drive miles to another town to protect a property thats not the kids
3. rittenhouse(a kid) again for emphasis should not have even been in the town let alone with a gun

4. if throwing a plastic bag is a deadly threat.. then massacres are going to be more common

5. after shooting someone for throwing a bag. ofcourse its going to escalate where people seeing this will start to give chase to stop the immature idiot from killing others.

6.. so lets get this straight.. the defense once to say
someone throwing a non lethal object is excusable to get shot with a lethal object. and then when other people try to disarm the idiot shooter. they are fair game to get shot too... sorry no.
idiot kid should have surrendered. and took his punishment.

1. He was the legal age to own a rifle.
2. People have a right to defend their property.
3. Violent pedophiles don't get to explude people from a city just because they've chosen to riot there.
4. Smashing someone with a skateboard and brandish a handgun at them are both threats.
5. See 4.
6. He did go to the police to surrender. They sent him home. And then when he was summoned to court, he went and stood trial. And he was found not guilty, which any sane person should be thrilled about.
member
Activity: 478
Merit: 66
up next...

wisconsin man runs over 40+ people..
republican idiots shout 'innocent coz right to travel'

Suspect via MULTIPLE sources In killing several and injuring scores more in #Waukesha  Just released 2 days ago on bond as well. Darrell Edward Brooks Jr. A real winner.

https://twitter.com/TheQuartering/status/1462628463517609984?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1462628463517609984%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1

he's also a registered sex offender. #BlackTerrorism

https://twitter.com/oaktreeupheaval/status/1462634560986906626?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1462634560986906626%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1

seriously there's like 25 different mugshots of this guy from multiple states.

this sort of black criminality where it goes on for years and years yet he keeps getting out on 1k bail to do it again is the sort of #BlackTerrorism Americans face everyday.

https://twitter.com/oaktreeupheaval/status/1462640157652185091?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1462642827737780225%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es2

turns out he's some dirtbag lowlife no name rapper. another shocker

you can see the car used in the terror attack in the back of one of his black rap music videos

https://youtube.com/channel/UCUI_NnHGW518kRgeDOTgH3Q

https://twitter.com/oaktreeupheaval/status/1462642827737780225?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1462642827737780225%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1

Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Edward Brooks was released from Milwaukee County jail on $1,000 bail earlier this week.

Here is Soros affiliated Milwaukee district attorney John Chisholm bragging about abolishing bail and congratulating other Soros DAs.

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1462647950941773831?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1462647950941773831%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1

legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
up next...

wisconsin man runs over 40+ people..
republican idiots shout 'innocent coz right to travel'
member
Activity: 478
Merit: 66

Crypto and physical PM's should outrun price inflation because of relative scarcity, and because distribution is very lop-sided.

Demand will probably fall faster than supply as the de-pop shot takes hold.  Distribution is another matter.  I wouldn't want to be in a city with no quick and easy way out...


Point taken but what about power disruptions that is where it is good to diversify into the real OG altcoin to the USD: Precious Metals and any other things of value. Crypto will help but should not be the end all be all.




Good opportunities to pick up a lot of stuff that the dearly departed have no more use for.  To the degree that their would be competition, many of them will be the perps and richly deserve a place in hell.  With a little good luck there will be enough non-perps to help usher them up to have a little chat with St. Peter.  Life will probably the opposite of 'stagnate'.

We you a point there that most will be dug out if they played a part in all of this or perceived to have played a part in the pandemic. I'm just feeling you out here to see where you are at.


Honestly, I don't think you have yet grasped the magnitude of what has been unleashed and your mind is still tethered to the 'old-normal' more than is healthy for planning purposes.  Hopefully I am over-estimating things, but after what has gotten us here to late 2021, I kind of doubt it.


I'm not quite on the old normal but it is hard to let go, I will admit this. I'm pretty well prepared.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276

Funny how the 'new normal' policies always seem to hurt small business and consequently favor big multi-national corporations.  Honestly, as someone on the higher end of the wealth curve and someone who doesn't get off on pleb things (work, sporting events, social gathering, phony FBIFA led 'insurrections', etc) the 'new normal' has worked out pretty well for me so far both financially and in other ways.  Once the clot-shot has fully worked it's magic on the useless eaters, things could be even better.


I don't think life will continue to work out for you. Not all the people who took the vax are useless eaters there are still quite a few small and medium businesses that have a big impact on your life. So what will happen is you think you are wealthy, try buying a loaf of bread for $1000, $10000 dollars

Crypto and physical PM's should outrun price inflation because of relative scarcity, and because distribution is very lop-sided.

because without a supply chain and with soon to be high demand you will see it.

Demand will probably fall faster than supply as the de-pop shot takes hold.  Distribution is another matter.  I wouldn't want to be in a city with no quick and easy way out...

If you had your own island or owned a huge swath of farmland where you could sustain yourself like a Billionaire or someone worth at least 100 Million dollars then I could say your life would merely stagnate.

Good opportunities to pick up a lot of stuff that the dearly departed have no more use for.  To the degree that their would be competition, many of them will be the perps and richly deserve a place in hell.  With a little good luck there will be enough non-perps to help usher them up to have a little chat with St. Peter.  Life will probably the opposite of 'stagnate'.

Now dare I say that you mandated the vax those on government programs (welfare, social security, government pension, works for government) over people working a regular job supporting the real economy then your statement would have substance. I believe it is coming that those on government programs will be mandated to take the vaccine (I bet its in this new bill currently being passed). So just to collect your SS, welfare or pension you will need the keep getting updates on the vaccine otherwise the government cuts you off (mark of the beast). Since they attempted and in many cases succeeded in to forcing people to the jab, your (and hell everyone's) quality of life will continue to erode at a rapid pace mid-December to early-January.

Honestly, I don't think you have yet grasped the magnitude of what has been unleashed and your mind is still tethered to the 'old-normal' more than is healthy for planning purposes.  Hopefully I am over-estimating things, but after what has gotten us here to late 2021, I kind of doubt it.

member
Activity: 478
Merit: 66


Funny how the 'new normal' policies always seem to hurt small business and consequently favor big multi-national corporations.  Honestly, as someone on the higher end of the wealth curve and someone who doesn't get off on pleb things (work, sporting events, social gathering, phony FBIFA led 'insurrections', etc) the 'new normal' has worked out pretty well for me so far both financially and in other ways.  Once the clot-shot has fully worked it's magic on the useless eaters, things could be even better.



I don't think life will continue to work out for you. Not all the people who took the vax are useless eaters there are still quite a few small and medium businesses that have a big impact on your life. So what will happen is you think you are wealthy, try buying a loaf of bread for $1000, $10000 dollars because without a supply chain and with soon to be high demand you will see it. If you had your own island or owned a huge swath of farmland where you could sustain yourself like a Billionaire or someone worth at least 100 Million dollars then I could say your life would merely stagnate. Now dare I say that you mandated the vax those on government programs (welfare, social security, government pension, works for government) over people working a regular job supporting the real economy then your statement would have substance. I believe it is coming that those on government programs will be mandated to take the vaccine (I bet its in this new bill currently being passed). So just to collect your SS, welfare or pension you will need the keep getting updates on the vaccine otherwise the government cuts you off (mark of the beast). Since they attempted and in many cases succeeded in to forcing people to the jab, your (and hell everyone's) quality of life will continue to erode at a rapid pace mid-December to early-January.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
BLM terrorists

There are some people who always want to cause trouble, riot, loot, etc. A public protest of sufficient size will always attract these people, irrespective of the reason for protest (and irrespective of whether it's 'right' or 'left'). This fact doesn't invalidate all mass protests, does it? Perhaps some people out there are peacefully protesting against racial injustice? I've had discussions with you before, and I know you're not stupid, so you must realise this. In which case, why do you equate BLM with terrorism? What's the real reason? Those blacks have been uppity since the '60s, haven't they? They should know their place and get back on the plantation, amirite? [/s]



there's probably nothing useful for me to add to this conversation.

Yeah, same for me.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
Can you see how the Rittenhouse verdict may have consequences here?

What's funny is the these pollsters will never ask politically inconvenient questions because they're afraid of the left wing mob. Are you aware of the damage that BLM terrorists have done during 2020 to American cities because George Floyd died of a fentanyl induced heart attack?

Well, let's dive into that question starting where the events took place -- 550 million alone in Minneapolis.

https://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-foundation-raising-20-million-to-rebuild-small-businesses-hurt-in-2020-riots/600058520/

Quote

Private insurance has been estimated at covering only about half the estimated $550 million in damage to businesses disproportionately owned by small operators, many of them immigrants and people of color.

Were these right wing Trump supporters that did this?

The J6 attacks, or "insurrection" as it is called, were a bunch of toothless Trump supporters from Alabama armed with MAGA hats and selfie sticks trespassing on the Capitol building. Absolutely terrifying.

Wasn't that was the 'rally' where the NIH said that it was safe to come out of lockdown and gather together since 'covid' was taking that weekend off?

Funny how the 'new normal' policies always seem to hurt small business and consequently favor big multi-national corporations.  Honestly, as someone on the higher end of the wealth curve and someone who doesn't get off on pleb things (work, sporting events, social gathering, phony FBIFA led 'insurrections', etc) the 'new normal' has worked out pretty well for me so far both financially and in other ways.  Once the clot-shot has fully worked it's magic on the useless eaters, things could be even better.

legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
Can you see how the Rittenhouse verdict may have consequences here?

What's funny is the these pollsters will never ask politically inconvenient questions because they're afraid of the left wing mob. Are you aware of the damage that BLM terrorists have done during 2020 to American cities because George Floyd died of a fentanyl induced heart attack?

Well, let's dive into that question starting where the events took place -- 550 million alone in Minneapolis.

https://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-foundation-raising-20-million-to-rebuild-small-businesses-hurt-in-2020-riots/600058520/

Quote
Private insurance has been estimated at covering only about half the estimated $550 million in damage to businesses disproportionately owned by small operators, many of them immigrants and people of color.

Were these right wing Trump supporters that did this?

The J6 attacks, or "insurrection" as it is called, were a bunch of toothless Trump supporters from Alabama armed with MAGA hats and selfie sticks trespassing on the Capitol building. Absolutely terrifying.
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence
> snip<
Ok, then answer my question
>snip<
Yeah...no, I said what I had to say to you.

I'm sure you'll have plenty of posters come along shortly to continue the stupid ass conversation you're having with yourself.

*there's probably nothing useful for me to add to this conversation.
member
Activity: 478
Merit: 66

Don't post some some shit I didn't say as a fucking quote. (and for emphases I mean that)
If you want to post what I said that made you draw that narrow conclusion and then equate it that way: fine that's your opinion.

AND P.S. I'm not a democrat or republican,  I rarely watch the news,  I read <------so I'm accustomed to hardly anyone getting or agreeing with what I'm saying.

I am a classical liberal: I believe a small, limited government's role is to protect its citizens interests and liberties with the least amount of interference to the individual.
If "conservatives" really believed that, I'd go back to being a republican.


For clarity:
I think race is just another social construct, like caste systems, the idea of monarchs born to rule ect. People of all genders and colors can more easily lean into the roles of oppressor than anyone would care to give attention to.
If you watch a Doc like Age of Rage or Kill All the Brutes it gives a small perspective into the human psyche protecting its own fragile ego.

There is not a question that we find people who look like "us" and think like "us" more relatable or that we use heuristics as part of our decision making process (especially in heated circumstances).
Our unquestioned biases are not always easy to see, especially when it's something we agree with or slanted in our favor but they are only part of "a truth".



Ok, then answer my question how does what Rittenhouse did akin to racism? When he was just there to protect his dad's and other businesses. None of the casualties or as you call them "victims" were black but rather the same race as him white. I don't see it as this at all but rather an overblown media hype stating this because it was at a BLM "protest" that usually ends in what I said to you before: property damage and looting.
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence

Rittenhouse = Racism


Its people like you that spout racism so damned much that the word has no fucking mean kind of like how people use the word fuck so much it no longer has emphasis in meaning. What does racism have to do with Rittenhouse he did not kill anyone that was black. The only parallel is that this happening during a "mostly peaceful" protest for BLM where we all know where this usually leads to property damage and looting for free stuff since ol Bernie and AOC couldn't give it to you cuz they want their bilk.

Don't post some bullshit I didn't say as a fucking quote. (and for emphases I mean that)
If you want to post what I said that made you draw that narrow conclusion and then equate it that way: fine that's your opinion.

AND P.S. I'm not a democrat or republican,  I rarely watch the news,  I read <------so I'm accustomed to hardly anyone getting or agreeing with what I'm saying.

I am a classical liberal: I believe a small, limited government's role is to protect its citizens interests and liberties with the least amount of interference to the individual.
If "conservatives" really believed that, I'd go back to being a republican.


For clarity:
I think race is just another social construct, like caste systems, the idea of monarchs born to rule ect. People of all genders and colors can more easily lean into the roles of oppressor than anyone would care to give attention to.
If you watch a Doc like Age of Rage or Kill All the Brutes it gives a small perspective into the human psyche protecting its own fragile ego.

There is not a question that we find people who look like "us" and think like "us" more relatable or that we use heuristics as part of our decision making process (especially in heated circumstances).
Our unquestioned biases are not always easy to see, especially when it's something we agree with or slanted in our favor but they are only part of "a truth".

member
Activity: 478
Merit: 66
funny part is im not even american.
funnier part is some people think they understand the american constitution but then prove their ignorance when the ignore the words like "well regulated".
so while some idiots think its ok to give 17yo's a gun and an excuse to kill anyone trying to disarm them.. 'coz constitution' . they forget that their constitution never actually expressly allows anyone to kill anyone

EG candles are not illegal.. but using them to start arson and burn people is illegal
being allowed to own a candle does not give freedom of moral-ignorance to then burn people

having a car does not mean you can run people over

its not about law. its about intelligence and morals... common sense stuff

as for thinking i am against freedom of speach. well you can say what you like but understand that your right to say bull-crap does not mean someone else cannot correct you and show other readers that your rants about freedoms are flawed.
oh and just to note. you have the right to speak. but that does not mean you have the right to a loudspeaker device, a stage or a platform.
those who own platforms, stages, forums have their own right to ban whomever they like.
this does not gag your speach. because your jaw still moves and your tongue still wiggles. so just remember you have the right to speak. but not the freedom to spam forums with bull crap and think that no one should correct, debunk or rebuttal you.

with right also comes with responsibility.
seems you forget about responsibility. especially with your mindset that a guy with a gun vs a guy without a gun.. the guy with the gun has responsibility for his actions.

So I'm trying to remember... Are you from the UK? Or Europe? Where they both have illegal immigrant Middle East/Afrikaners that half the time end up stabbing people, raping women, or blowing things up? It might help to have an amendment to own a firearm to defend one's self to counteract these terrible acts, am I right? Then these people wouldn't feel so welcomed to commit these acts because no one will do anything about them. Or are you from Australia where they took that right away and now they under absolute COVID tyranny like Europe/UK?




Quote
Who Thinks Political Violence Is Justified?
After the violent attacks on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, the prospect of political violence threatening a peaceful transfer of power has become more than an abstract question. As noted above, nearly one in five Americans (18%) agree with the statement “Because things have gotten so far off track, true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country.” Republicans (30%) are more likely to agree with this than independents (17%) and Democrats (11%). Among Republicans who most trust far-right news sources, agreement increases to 40%, compared to 32% among those who most trust Fox News and 22% among those who most trust mainstream news sources.
https://www.prri.org/research/competing-visions-of-america-an-evolving-identity-or-a-culture-under-attack/




Your chart over samples Democrats btw.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
It's also now reasonable for far-right vigilantes to roam around the country, travelling from state to state, killing whoever they please, so long as they can provide (or have a lawyer who can provide) some flimsy pretext.
The verdict does appear to have set an alarming precedent. Anyone who protests against anything is now fair game for any extremist with a gun.


The aftermath of 2020 was bad enough. Imagine what might happen if Trump loses again in '24.
What riots were there in 2020 after Trump lost the first time? What does this have to do with Trump?

It has nothing to do with Trump, yet. I'm considering a future scenario, in which this ruling and the current machinations of elements of the Republican party intersect.

I'm not sure whether or not you personally believe the election was stolen. But of course you're aware that Trump wasn't happy about losing, and has done everything he can to try to reverse the decision, and to subvert the democratic process. Even Mitch McConnell has been clear on the consequences of this, during Biden's certification.

But Trump is charismatic, and knows how to rile up his base. And he has plenty of allies. And a large proportion of the population believe his claims, including 68% of Republican voters. Also, 30% of Republicans believe that "true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country". Can you see how the Rittenhouse verdict may have consequences here?


Quote
Who Thinks Political Violence Is Justified?
After the violent attacks on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, the prospect of political violence threatening a peaceful transfer of power has become more than an abstract question. As noted above, nearly one in five Americans (18%) agree with the statement “Because things have gotten so far off track, true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country.” Republicans (30%) are more likely to agree with this than independents (17%) and Democrats (11%). Among Republicans who most trust far-right news sources, agreement increases to 40%, compared to 32% among those who most trust Fox News and 22% among those who most trust mainstream news sources.
https://www.prri.org/research/competing-visions-of-america-an-evolving-identity-or-a-culture-under-attack/

Ultimately Trump wasn't able to reverse the election result, because he didn't have his people in the right places. This is a mistake he is working hard to address for '24. It's no coincidence that Trump allies are running for secretary of state in certain locations... and not even just against Democrat incumbents, they're also fighting against those Republicans who opposed 'stop the steal'.

If you don't get enough votes to win an election, and the officials refuse to reverse the decision in your favour, then you have two options. You can get more votes, or you can put more compliant officials in place. One is somewhat easier than the other.

So, consider the four points below, and ask yourself whether these might not intersect if Trump loses in '24.

1) 30% of Republican voters believe that "true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country".
2) Trump is putting the 'correct' officials in place, who will certify the results in his favour regardless of the vote count.
3) If the votes say the Democrats won, but the 'impartial' officials say that Trump won, then a lot of Democrat voters will head out onto the streets to complain.
4) The Rittenhouse verdict means that "true American patriots" can kill protesters with impunity, and the dead won't even be called victims.


legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
This whole thing was a staged and choreographed hoax from the get go.

It's funny to see the Q-tard-ee wing of the 'truthers' fall for even the most ridiculous of gas-light theater shows when the script is written to seem to support their side of things.  Bundy Ranch and Malheur come to mind.

ok so there we have it. tvbcof is a copy and paste conspiracy nut now following the alex-jones styled cultish narrative.

why is it that tvbcof swaps one cultish conspiracy nut influencer for another

is there no chance of tvbcof ever having an original independent thought, or is this forum doomed to just read repeats of something he saw elsewhere and is just rehashing their script
...

Wrong again.  In the case of Bundy Ranch, I fell for it for a few days.  Then I saw one obscure vid from a no-name analyst about one of the acts (a tasering along a road) and it was obvious that there was a lot of stagecraft.  Simple logic implies that if one act is scripted, the whole thing _must_ be.  After that it was just a matter of weighing the 'stage show' hypothesis against others in analyzing observations.  It explained most of the observations, stage mistakes, and other oddities perfectly.

The number of people analyzing the right-wing flavored hoaxes is minuscule.  More left-wing friendly stuff (e.g., Boston or Sandy Hook) gets skeptical attention, but even here it has been stamped out pretty well through programs of 'controlling the narrative.'  The kind of burying and quashing of voices and analysis was nothing new for the scamdemic.  I've seen it for years, and well over half a decade for certain critical and obscure subjects.  The scamdemic simply made it the 'new normal'.

In the case of the Kenosha hoax, I was completely first, and almost the only person calling it.  Ever.  When I went looking for a vid for my post above, I scoured through Jewtube for a while with zero results for skepticism.  Buttchute had a ton of 'mainstream' right-wing crap, but I had to seek high and low before finding that woman's video which I posted.

Funny story:  When Sandy Hook happened I checked what Alex Jones had to say just out of curiosity.  His position was that it was real and as the government said, and 'just because some things have been staged doesn't mean everything is.'  Only when a ton of other's started proving the fraud in undeniable ways did Jones dip is toe in when he started losing cred, then he pulled it right back out when it started costing him in mainstream attacks.  Most of the people doing real work on Sandy Hook left the genera and/or died (e.g., Jeff C.)

Pages:
Jump to: