I've been playing online poker a very long time and I don't care what site I'm playing at or how transparent their RNG might be, when I go through streaks of unfavorable variance, there is always something in the back of my mind that says, "Rigged!" Then the tilt syndrome sets in and that distrust affects my decision making processes....so ---> if there were a means to insure the integrity of the game as a whole, I think that would be a good thing.
There's this thought going around that maybe some of these sites are "rigging" the game to skew the odds in favor of the "underdogs" in order to maintain site traffic to generate rake and fees. In the past, poker sites recognized lower traffic as the "sharks" (regs) optimized their game and became extremely skilled at finding and attacking the "bums" (recs) which discouraged and limited the amount of time recreational players spent on the poker sites....so....the thought is that skewing the odds in favor of the recs slightly would keep them in the game longer, thereby, generating more rake and fees for these sites ---> that hasn't been proven but there's a lot of anecdotal evidence that suggest it may be true.
I've been playing online poker a very long time and I don't care what site I'm playing at or how transparent their RNG might be, when I go through streaks of unfavorable variance, there is always something in the back of my mind that says, "Rigged!" Then the tilt syndrome sets in and that distrust affects my decision making processes....so ---> if there were a means to insure the integrity of the game as a whole, I think that would be a good thing.
There's this thought going around that maybe some of these sites are "rigging" the game to skew the odds in favor of the "underdogs" in order to maintain site traffic to generate rake and fees. In the past, poker sites recognized lower traffic as the "sharks" (regs) optimized their game and became extremely skilled at finding and attacking the "bums" (recs) which discouraged and limited the amount of time recreational players spent on the poker sites....so....the thought is that skewing the odds in favor of the recs slightly would keep them in the game longer, thereby, generating more rake and fees for these sites ---> that hasn't been proven but there's a lot of anecdotal evidence that suggest it may be true.
The reality may be that all professionals who are very few in gambling win at the expense of beginners and incompetent players. It seems to me that this has always been and will be so.