Nice article this is good to know what are the differences between both projects. I will keep follow this thread for more details this is looking nice project when legit team.
Hi jwsu1113,
the two projects are both interesting but very different. I'll try to explain what are the main points of difference.
Since we don't have anything to do with the 300 Token team, I apologize if I'll write something wrong and please take part of the discussion to correct me.
We obviously don't have anything againts 300 Spartan tokens and his team!
- 300Token: one of the first token build through the Minereum Token Services, born in memory of 300 Spartan Soldiers to be hold by investors or traded on exchanges
- Persian Token: build in memory of Persian Soldiers, to be used on a battle smart contract as a challenge against 300 token
Why we launch this challenge ? We belive that 300 Token was a nice idea, but holding them foreover is useless.
So we build a (virtually) opposite token to be used on a battle smart contract. The first battle contract is on his road to be release in time for 19th August.
We aim that there will be a great participation on this ICO and (even more important) on the battle. We hope that 300 token holders will use their token!
Then everyone could decide to hold the token (one of our goals is to quote Persian token on exchanges too).
If the participation on the battle will be great we'll write more battle contract with other functionalities! So both token will be used again!
I hope I have solved your doubts, if you have any other question, write again!
Persians are coming
King Xerxes
