Pages:
Author

Topic: PSA: cypherdoc is a paid shill, liar and probably epic scammer: HashFast affair - page 4. (Read 19813 times)

legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276

If he's unwilling to elaborate on the details of the outcome there's a good chance they look bad for him ... or he would be crowing from the rooftops. Just going on past behavior experience and base human nature.

He was probably forced to give up his ill-begotten BTC or things are still happening and his lawyer advised him to keep the cork in his pie-hole.  Maybe both.

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0

If he's unwilling to elaborate on the details of the outcome there's a good chance they look bad for him ... or he would be crowing from the rooftops. Just going on past behavior experience and base human nature.

OP, you sound kind of butthurt.  Is it your intention to inflict as much pain and misery onto cipherdoc as possible because of some other agenda?  Now that the case is over terminated, there seem to be no basis for your inflammatory thread.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo

If he's unwilling to elaborate on the details of the outcome there's a good chance they look bad for him ... or he would be crowing from the rooftops. Just going on past behavior experience and base human nature.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
great! we will get our bitcoins paid to HF back from Mark Lowe (cypherdoc)!

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/tag/marc-lowe/

LULZ.  Cough 'em up, bitch!

Or you could try 'losing' them.  I wouldn't recommend it.  Wouldn't life have been easier if you had just sat on your early stash and not gone about trying to rip people off?



LOL.  Come correct, homes.

legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
great! we will get our bitcoins paid to HF back from Mark Lowe (cypherdoc)!

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/tag/marc-lowe/

LULZ.  Cough 'em up, bitch!

Or you could try 'losing' them.  I wouldn't recommend it.  Wouldn't life have been easier if you had just sat on your early stash and not gone about trying to rip people off?

legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
great! we will get our bitcoins paid to HF back from Mark Lowe (cypherdoc)!

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/tag/marc-lowe/

LULZ.  Cough 'em up, bitch!

Or you could try 'losing' them.  I wouldn't recommend it.  Wouldn't life have been easier if you had just sat on your early stash and not gone about trying to rip people off?

legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
great! we will get our bitcoins paid to HF back from Mark Lowe (cypherdoc)!

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/tag/marc-lowe/
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
http://www.blockcy.com/digital-currencies-commodities-judge

appears that this ruling means cypherdoc has to hand back the full 3000 btc, as a commodity, to the receivers of HashFast, maybe there will be some justice for those who paid BTC for pre-orders and never received any mining equipment.

that's not what it means at all.

it means that the trustees just have the chance to possibly win back the full 3000 btc, however unlikely.

did you ever consider just handing it back to the people who never got any hardware delivered for their pre-order bitcoin deposits? Like the people that it most probably rightfully belongs to? How does your ethical thinking work here?

doesn't work that way. once plaintiffs got lawyers involved that need to be paid that became impossible.

And why do you think they got lawyers involved?

meh, whatever excuse that scammer can come up with.

hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
http://www.blockcy.com/digital-currencies-commodities-judge

appears that this ruling means cypherdoc has to hand back the full 3000 btc, as a commodity, to the receivers of HashFast, maybe there will be some justice for those who paid BTC for pre-orders and never received any mining equipment.

that's not what it means at all.

it means that the trustees just have the chance to possibly win back the full 3000 btc, however unlikely.

did you ever consider just handing it back to the people who never got any hardware delivered for their pre-order bitcoin deposits? Like the people that it most probably rightfully belongs to? How does your ethical thinking work here?

doesn't work that way. once plaintiffs got lawyers involved that need to be paid that became impossible.

And why do you think they got lawyers involved?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
http://www.blockcy.com/digital-currencies-commodities-judge

appears that this ruling means cypherdoc has to hand back the full 3000 btc, as a commodity, to the receivers of HashFast, maybe there will be some justice for those who paid BTC for pre-orders and never received any mining equipment.

that's not what it means at all.

it means that the trustees just have the chance to possibly win back the full 3000 btc, however unlikely.

did you ever consider just handing it back to the people who never got any hardware delivered for their pre-order bitcoin deposits? Like the people that it most probably rightfully belongs to? How does your ethical thinking work here?

doesn't work that way. once plaintiffs got lawyers involved that need to be paid that became impossible.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
http://www.blockcy.com/digital-currencies-commodities-judge

appears that this ruling means cypherdoc has to hand back the full 3000 btc, as a commodity, to the receivers of HashFast, maybe there will be some justice for those who paid BTC for pre-orders and never received any mining equipment.

that's not what it means at all.

it means that the trustees just have the chance to possibly win back the full 3000 btc, however unlikely.

did you ever consider just handing it back to the people who never got any hardware delivered for their pre-order bitcoin deposits? Like the people that it most probably rightfully belongs to? How does your ethical thinking work here?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
http://www.blockcy.com/digital-currencies-commodities-judge

appears that this ruling means cypherdoc has to hand back the full 3000 btc, as a commodity, to the receivers of HashFast, maybe there will be some justice for those who paid BTC for pre-orders and never received any mining equipment.

that's not what it means at all.

it means that the trustees just have the chance to possibly win back the full 3000 btc, however unlikely.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
http://www.blockcy.com/digital-currencies-commodities-judge

appears that this ruling means cypherdoc has to hand back the full 3000 btc, as a commodity, to the receivers of HashFast, maybe there will be some justice for those who paid BTC for pre-orders and never received any mining equipment.

Haaaa ha ha ha.  Seems that as I anticipated, the judge in the earlier case would say to Dr. Lowelife, "No, keep the 3k BTC for now, but don't forget where you put them and don't stray to far away."

Pages:
Jump to: