Aren't spam bots banning them temporarily for these one liners?
In other forums there is a feature called IP ban for spammers.
@hilariousandco, you need to look at this spammer!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13463914 
Topic: Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys) - page 12. (Read 38191 times)
This thread should be stickied in order not to accept them any further in any of signature campaigns.
Aren't spam bots banning them temporarily for these one liners?
In other forums there is a feature called IP ban for spammers.
@hilariousandco, you need to look at this spammer! https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13463914
Aren't spam bots banning them temporarily for these one liners?
In other forums there is a feature called IP ban for spammers.
@hilariousandco, you need to look at this spammer!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13463914 
Check this guy out, 1 page of 1 liners, some with just 2 words on it, some are just non-sense. Not from Yobit but from Bitmixer
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/windpower-505530
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/windpower-505530;sa=showPosts
https://archive.is/yT2zZ
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/windpower-505530
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/windpower-505530;sa=showPosts
https://archive.is/yT2zZ
Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?
Of course they do. The people that are wearing sigs are getting paid to spam. Whereas people without sigs, aren't getting paid, they are just being assholes.
Check out this useless spammer..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552;sa=showPosts
Well thats a spammer for this list , nonetheless, you can inform secondstrade.com , he is quite fast in removing spammers since last time. https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552;sa=showPosts
Check out this useless spammer..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552;sa=showPosts
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluetiger73-561552;sa=showPosts
global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It looks neither hilarious nor yobit has an answer or may be didn't notice my post.
I noticed it it just has nothing to do with me so take it up with yobit or get over the fact you were booted and move on.
He's just given me access to kick people off but waiting for him to give me a list of all the members on the campaign then will start going through them all. Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off
Once again.............Certainly nice move/method as it's a way of giving them a 'chance' to improve.
But,just a thought,did not the ones like me get deprived of this 'chance' now as I was already removed from the campaign?
Can I expect a reply from hilarious or yobit ?
[/quote]
It looks neither hilarious nor yobit has an answer or may be didn't notice my post
Booted them. Almost certainly the same user.
I was wondering if they were the same user, all three accounts seemed to have identical posting styles. Thanks for handling them! global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I've created a serious test thread to lure them in. The results are scientific, disturbing.
Booted them. Almost certainly the same user.
I've created a serious test thread to lure them in. The results are scientific, disturbing.
Lol they're coming like bees come to honeyOh and hiarious, time to ban them+exclude them from campaign, preferably the first one:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bvadi146-556317
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/danswer42-556316
More than 3 topics' last post was by them, just... spammy
Why are you telling the Bitcointalk community. Tell YoBit. Or in fact now, tell hilariousandco.
We really need a local spammer. A lot of spammers post in local. We need to do something about it. Most people don't care because it doesn't affect them.
You realize your posts are pretty spammy too, right? You are posting like 20 posts in bursts and most of them are pretty shitty if you ask me.
We really need a local spammer. A lot of spammers post in local. We need to do something about it. Most people don't care because it doesn't affect them.
He's just given me access to kick people off but waiting for him to give me a list of all the members on the campaign then will start going through them all. Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off
[/quote]
Once again.............Certainly nice move/method as it's a way of giving them a 'chance' to improve.
But,just a thought,did not the ones like me get deprived of this 'chance' now as I was already removed from the campaign?
Can I expect a reply from hilarious or yobit ?
global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
December 20, 2015, 05:33:26 AM
Most of those aren't even on yobit. I've messaged everyone on the campaign and told them they have a week to improve or they're getting kicked off so hopefully that will motivate them.
December 20, 2015, 02:25:23 AM
-snip-
December 20, 2015, 02:21:16 AM
December 07, 2015, 06:55:06 AM
Once again and it's just for the 'list makers' like mexxer-2 and XinXan.
How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/holdaaja-174973)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?
Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off because most of the campaign will be gone otherwise. How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/holdaaja-174973)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?
Certainly nice move/method as it's a way of giving them a 'chance' to improve.
But,just a thought,did not the ones like me get deprived of this 'chance' now as I was already removed from the campaign?
global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
December 06, 2015, 07:10:37 AM
Once again and it's just for the 'list makers' like mexxer-2 and XinXan.
How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/holdaaja-174973)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?
You're free to report them here. At any rate, I believe I made myself clear when I said I will not be actively updating the list as hilarious is their new campaign manager, so report them to him.How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/holdaaja-174973)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?
He's just given me access to kick people off but waiting for him to give me a list of all the members on the campaign then will start going through them all. Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off because most of the campaign will be gone otherwise. You can still keep updating this thread if you wish as I'll go through it soon.
Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?
Not really, but if you've got a signature you're often motivated to post more with less quality and the longer they go on getting paid the number of posts increases and the quality decreases so they get easier to spot. People often try farm accounts without signatures as well and they shoduldn't get away with posting crap just because they haven't got a signature.
December 05, 2015, 12:33:46 PM
Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?
Yes they judge people wearing signatures differently than people not wearing them. Although some of them say everyone will be judged by the same rules in the end it's not really true.
It is fair though to judge at a different level. One could say someone with a sig has a financial gain for having more posts, so there is a reason for posting. And sadly a lot of the newbie ones (like yobit) seem to bring out a lot of spammers for a little pay. It's not we think it's happening it's face look at this thread of spammers.
When you wear a sig make sure to not do one liners or usless offtopic over and over. And it's fair I acccept my posts are judged harder as I wear a sig. If you want to post "+1", "I agree", etc do not wear a sig it's simple.
Jump to: