Pages:
Author

Topic: Publication of copyright photos without permission (plagiarism), personal data.. - page 2. (Read 1667 times)

sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 278
If something is not right for you - contact the police!

I already did...

http://www.fntt.lt/en/

https://ssu.gov.ua/ua/pages/30

https://www.mastercard.us/en-us/merchants/safety-security/suspect-fraud.html

The company operates legally with all the documents

Could you please show us that documents?

I didn’t create a topic for discussing the company, but about using false accusations to me using my copyright photos, editing to humiliate and insult and share personal data without my permission.

Please provide the proof that your photos are copyrighted. (Copyright registration documents)

Nobody is obliged to prove anything to you

I bought some of minex shitcoins and now you can consider me as a investor. So I have rights to ask legal questions about your scammy project.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 28
But Minexcoin is 100% legal company.

Where is it registered? Could you show us the registration documents?

which providing bank card service to their customers.

Cards (That are not working any more) are issued by Upay for the company called  UAB KRISTOLINIS DUGNAS which is a Lithuanian tableware trading company. The people that received or are waiting for cards have nothing to do with the company mentioned above. Could you please explain That?



I think it's time to create another topic at Bicointalk where devs of all coins can cooperate against extortionists and thru the court or by free will of Bitcointalk get their personal data and pass that to the police to judge them by law. That is pure crime which happens in Bitcointalk

I think it is time to get the personal data of all Minexcoin developers and forward it to police, because of online fraud, card fraud, and illegal financial activities. But don't worry, people who received fraudulent cards and lost their money in your scam will do that without our help and all of you will go to the jail. One scammer Yurii Pogrebnijak is already exposed and believe me all others will join him very soon.

You are not a court to prove to you. If something is not right for you - contact the police! Or just shut your mouth. This is rude, but true.
Nobody is obliged to prove anything to you. The company operates legally with all the documents, as it has lawyers who are smarter than you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And add. I didn’t create a topic for discussing the company, but about using false accusations to me using my copyright photos, editing to humiliate and insult and share personal data without my permission.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 278
But Minexcoin is 100% legal company.

Where is it registered? Could you show us the registration documents?

which providing bank card service to their customers.

Cards (That are not working any more) are issued by Upay for the company called  UAB KRISTOLINIS DUGNAS which is a Lithuanian tableware trading company. The people that received or are waiting for cards have nothing to do with the company mentioned above. Could you please explain That?



I think it's time to create another topic at Bicointalk where devs of all coins can cooperate against extortionists and thru the court or by free will of Bitcointalk get their personal data and pass that to the police to judge them by law. That is pure crime which happens in Bitcointalk

I think it is time to get the personal data of all Minexcoin developers and forward it to police, because of online fraud, card fraud, and illegal financial activities. But don't worry, people who received fraudulent cards and lost their money in your scam will do that without our help and all of you will go to the jail. One scammer Yurii Pogrebnijak is already exposed and believe me all others will join him very soon.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 28
Therefore, users who distribute my photos without my knowledge have such status as thieves. They stole it and now use it in their messages, edit it, etc.

Funny reply, so what about those using trump's image without his knowledge all over the internet?. If you want people to stop using your photos on the internet without your permission then you need to stop posting them on the web and better still avoid using the web. Like previous users have said, i don't see any of the claims above as plagiarism, when you commit plagiarism you steal people's work and claim it as yours and fair use of your picture isn't plagiarism period.


First, find at least one of the photos on the Internet and show me here! They are unique, as you will not find any of them, which is already the right to authorship. And I have the originals and the camera, which they were shot. I will issue a certificate for you - do not worry. I have already contacted a lawyer. And be sure that anyone who uses it without my permission will break the law.

And let you be adequate and not compare a public person, a state person with a private person. You still give as an example of an actor who earns his face ...)))))
The most striking thing is that the matter is not in the faces and if even the photo shows nature and I am the author of this photo, then using the photo without my permission is also a violation of my rights attorneys.
And if you distribute a photo taken by Trump himself at home, you will also violate Trump's copyright.

 So do not talk nonsense.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

What kind of illegal things?
Who mentioned illegal usage of photos, you or me?
2. Only the court has the right to establish the legality or lawlessness of some facts.
Is this court of law? Or discussion forum?

3. The fact that the user once did a favor and then slandered other people 100 times is useful?
Isn't the fact that user posted facts?

4. The user has the right to only assume, suspect, have an opinion or an inclination (like - do not like the project).
Can we say that user, based on facts presented in thread, have right to assume and suspect that minex is scam and discuss about it?

And also indicate that no investigations are legally binding, as they are not conducted by authorized services, but in turn, these “false accusations” can be prosecuted.
Ever heard of news reporters?

1. I created a channel under a false name today, especially for you fools.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Now you are complaining that someone is using your picture and personal information.

As you said this isn't your name, and now you are pretending to be a guy which you claim you are not, luring people to register under your referral link for your own financial gains, isn't that called identity theft?

Quote
Identity theft is the deliberate use of someone else's identity, usually as a method to gain a financial advantage or obtain credit and other benefits in the other person's name, and perhaps to the other person's disadvantage or loss. The person whose identity has been assumed may suffer adverse consequences, especially if they are held responsible for the perpetrator's actions. Identity theft occurs when someone uses another's personally identifying information, like their name, identifying number, or credit card number, without their permission, to commit fraud or other crimes.
source

In case identity is really yours (which you claim it isn't), there are also other laws for this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49587152 so make sure to read all laws regarding your...referral link.


1. What is the illegality of my attraction of people to the coin? It is forbidden? Not? Then it is better for you to be silent.

2. So then spend a discussion here and do not claim that someone is a crook or not a crook.
 There is a presumption of innocence: Anyone held accountable for a criminal offense is presumed innocent until proven otherwise. (Art. 383 of the New York Code of Criminal Procedure).

3. User facts are not legal facts. Neither the court nor even a lawyer established them. It's just his subjective reflections - no more.

4. It may suspect, but based on its opinion, but not on facts that are not proven by authorized bodies. It can also be assumed but not blamed. NEVER CANNOT BE ACCUSED WITHOUT OFFICIAL EVIDENCE! That's when the fact is proved by the court - then it can. Maybe then jump on his head, discussing the fact of fraud to someone else.

5. No comments. I heard the nightingales sing.

6. I had the right to defend myself. My lie did no harm to anyone. I hoped then that these users would stop and stop disseminating information. Is this prohibited by law ??

7. To begin, I will inform you that my links are not valid and the referral program was completed on January 24th. I just copied what was at hand. And even if I used it, it does not contradict any law, since it is officially authorized by Chain2Pay OÜ.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

P.S. Here everyone can see what BitPotus is capable of. A person who can only insult, sexually harass, and blame someone.

It sounds like that. He is guilty. Why? Because I'm so sure.
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 604
I don't allow to use my copyright photos on the forum

Do you have officially copyrighted your photos ? If yes, please show us the registration certificate. All your photos that are posted here, are in public access in your social media profiles. You are afraid that some Russian criminal dudes, hired by people who lost money in your scam, will find you and fuck you up your scammy ass. I strongly suggest you, to go to the jail yourself, before that dudes will find you. Scamming people and stealing their money is not a good idea, and the final result of that action, will be similar to what is happening now with you, and with whole minex project scam.

MINEX = Ponzi Scam (Check the rates of "parking" coins)

MINEX = Fraudulent Cards (Check the name of the company on so called "Minex" aka Upay cards)

MINEX = Stealing peoples identity via fake KYC (Check the procedures of receiving Minex card)

Conclusion: MINEX = SCAM.  
MNEX is useless shittoken. But Minexcoin is 100% legal company which providing bank card service to their customers. FUDders which extorted money from Minexcoin now attacking that project, same like many other projects. Jollygood and his popped thunderjet are frauders. I hope admins of Bitcointalk will found connection with person named in this link https://medium.com/@minecoinorg/minexcoin-resolutely-reacted-to-the-raging-crime-in-the-network-reward-20-btc-4a23e1ae2f34

I think it's time to create another topic at Bicointalk where devs of all coins can cooperate against extortionists and thru the court or by free will of Bitcointalk get their personal data and pass that to the police to judge them by law. That is pure crime which happens in Bitcointalk.


Minexcoin has been consistently deceiving its customers and Boris together with you, TemHuk have been lying through your teeth to raise money for your little scam operation.

It's really funny to see scammers like TEMHUK try to portray themselves as victims when there's plenty of evidence that shows that they are in fact nothing but a bunch of crooks that openly make threats to "destroy" anyone who tries to expose their scam.

Am sure plenty of us will welcome and be happy to cooperate with any official police investigation into any matters related to Minexcoin and its operations especially given the fact that Boris is already in trouble with the law with his real-life  tax evasion related to his construction business.

Below, we have TeMhuk threatening to doxx me for calling him out about the non-existent partnership with CSOB bank which had to be retracted after it was found that their third party provider Novarise was actually being run by someone who'd been jailed for fraud.

He also made threats to others who have been working tirelessly to expose this huge scam







And now this. "They" try to threaten people.





==============
==============






The scammer fool Temhuk sent me a PM saying he and his scammer friends "will do everything to destroy my reputation"  


I received a message from Temhuk, the first he sent me. I replied asking him to own up to being a scammer.

He sent me another message (second one) but he lied again. I told him he is a liar and that I will try to save people from investing in Minecoin.

Temhuk sent me another message (third one) saying he and his scammer friends "will do everything to destroy my reputation"

 Roll Eyes


SO GO FUCK YOURSELF WITH A CACTUS TEMKUNT.


 Kiss Kiss Kiss
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 259
I don't allow to use my copyright photos on the forum

Do you have officially copyrighted your photos ? If yes, please show us the registration certificate. All your photos that are posted here, are in public access in your social media profiles. You are afraid that some Russian criminal dudes, hired by people who lost money in your scam, will find you and fuck you up your scammy ass. I strongly suggest you, to go to the jail yourself, before that dudes will find you. Scamming people and stealing their money is not a good idea, and the final result of that action, will be similar to what is happening now with you, and with whole minex project scam.

MINEX = Ponzi Scam (Check the rates of "parking" coins)

MINEX = Fraudulent Cards (Check the name of the company on so called "Minex" aka Upay cards)

MINEX = Stealing peoples identity via fake KYC (Check the procedures of receiving Minex card)

Conclusion: MINEX = SCAM.  
MNEX is useless shittoken. But Minexcoin is 100% legal company which providing bank card service to their customers. FUDders which extorted money from Minexcoin now attacking that project, same like many other projects. Jollygood and his popped thunderjet are frauders. I hope admins of Bitcointalk will found connection with person named in this link https://medium.com/@minecoinorg/minexcoin-resolutely-reacted-to-the-raging-crime-in-the-network-reward-20-btc-4a23e1ae2f34

I think it's time to create another topic at Bicointalk where devs of all coins can cooperate against extortionists and thru the court or by free will of Bitcointalk get their personal data and pass that to the police to judge them by law. That is pure crime which happens in Bitcointalk.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 278
I don't allow to use my copyright photos on the forum

Do you have officially copyrighted your photos ? If yes, please show us the registration certificate. All your photos that are posted here, are in public access in your social media profiles. You are afraid that some Russian criminal dudes, hired by people who lost money in your scam, will find you and fuck you up your scammy ass. I strongly suggest you, to go to the jail yourself, before that dudes will find you. Scamming people and stealing their money is not a good idea, and the final result of that action, will be similar to what is happening now with you, and with whole minex project scam.

MINEX = Ponzi Scam (Check the rates of "parking" coins)

MINEX = Fraudulent Cards (Check the name of the company on so called "Minex" aka Upay cards)

MINEX = Stealing peoples identity via fake KYC (Check the procedures of receiving Minex card)

Conclusion: MINEX = SCAM.  
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
Although I am strongly against plagiarism happening here in the forum the screenshots of where the alleged "plagiarism" have taken in place really has no bearing under the fair use policy of our copyright laws. Below is just a given example of the mere definition of what fair use means on using copyrighted work such as images, videos, music, and of course written work is covered by the fair use policy.

fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

From what I am seeing with the screenshots you have posted they are just merely commenting on you being busted in your scam, so really there is no plagiarism happening when they used your photos as they have used it to identify the scammer's identity. So what it seems to me is you are just here asking for the mods to cover your tracks and hide your identity again in the forum.



Thank you for your post.

You have highlighted the issue at hand. The OP yurez83 just wants mods to cover his tracks after he has been associated with being a scammer and helping a scam outfit such as Minexcoin/Minexpay/Minexsystems and being a brand ambassador for a Minex sister company Republia.




legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
What kind of illegal things?
Who mentioned illegal usage of photos, you or me?
2. Only the court has the right to establish the legality or lawlessness of some facts.
Is this court of law? Or discussion forum?

3. The fact that the user once did a favor and then slandered other people 100 times is useful?
Isn't the fact that user posted facts?

4. The user has the right to only assume, suspect, have an opinion or an inclination (like - do not like the project).
Can we say that user, based on facts presented in thread, have right to assume and suspect that minex is scam and discuss about it?

And also indicate that no investigations are legally binding, as they are not conducted by authorized services, but in turn, these “false accusations” can be prosecuted.
Ever heard of news reporters?

1. I created a channel under a false name today, especially for you fools.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Now you are complaining that someone is using your picture and personal information.

As you said this isn't your name, and now you are pretending to be a guy which you claim you are not, luring people to register under your referral link for your own financial gains, isn't that called identity theft?

Quote
Identity theft is the deliberate use of someone else's identity, usually as a method to gain a financial advantage or obtain credit and other benefits in the other person's name, and perhaps to the other person's disadvantage or loss. The person whose identity has been assumed may suffer adverse consequences, especially if they are held responsible for the perpetrator's actions. Identity theft occurs when someone uses another's personally identifying information, like their name, identifying number, or credit card number, without their permission, to commit fraud or other crimes.
source

In case identity is really yours (which you claim it isn't), there are also other laws for this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49587152 so make sure to read all laws regarding your...referral link.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
Therefore, users who distribute my photos without my knowledge have such status as thieves. They stole it and now use it in their messages, edit it, etc.

Funny reply, so what about those using trump's image without his knowledge all over the internet?. If you want people to stop using your photos on the internet without your permission then you need to stop posting them on the web and better still avoid using the web. Like previous users have said, i don't see any of the claims above as plagiarism, when you commit plagiarism you steal people's work and claim it as yours and fair use of your picture isn't plagiarism period.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 28
- That's not plagiarism.
 - If there is dox outside of the investigations section, report it with that as the reason.
 - If someone is threatening violence against you, report it with that as the reason.
 - If you have a copyright claim, you have to PM/email me a valid DCMA takedown notice with all required elements, including your address, a declaration under penalty of perjury, etc. Note that I will forward your notice to the affected users.
 - The forum is not under EU jurisdiction.

Thanks for the answer. I understood your position and forum.
I need to talk to a lawyer to label my own.

As a regular user of the forum, I will allow you to give you advice. Define on the forum the exact rules regarding the dissemination of false information and charges. And also indicate that no investigations are legally binding, as they are not conducted by authorized services, but in turn, these “false accusations” can be prosecuted. So that users who spread lies were warned about liability. The same applies to the use of personal information and copyright materials.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 28
Any scam accusation that links the scam's shills to the scam team via photos is considered a dox?
What about all of the fake team photos constantly busted as lies proven by links to the actual photos with real names? Are all of those bannable doxes also?

He says here it is not even his name..


illegal [...] defend my rights through the courts [...] I will sue the forum
Minex shill talks about illegal things and want to sue someone. Maybe court will be interested to hear how minex shill tried to lure people into this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-minexpay-crypto-debit-card-by-minexpaycom-minexcoin-5046331

If this thread contains a dox should it not just be moved to the investigations board?
I believe this is best explanation https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43910598

Sometimes forum members unintentionally break forum rules. I don't think they should be banned for doing good to community, especially not when some scam shill shared his personal information on forum.


What kind of illegal things?

1. The investigation has the right to conduct only the police, and not some kind of user.
2. Only the court has the right to establish the legality or lawlessness of some facts.
3. The fact that the user once did a favor and then slandered other people 100 times is useful?
4. The user has the right to only assume, suspect, have an opinion or an inclination (like - do not like the project).

 How to deal with the fact that the user group in collusion begins a trolling attack on the project (user) with a distortion of truth in order to harm the reputation of the project (user)?
 Are you sure of their intentions?


Technically photos are not in breach of copyright on bitcointalk. The images are hosted on an external server not in control of this website. If there is a breach of copyright it is with the image host and the person who posted it. Bitcointalk only links to the image. In most jurisdictions linking to an image does not result in breach of copyright.


He is actually right, it doesn't matter if it's hosted on an external site or not, if you are the owner of the forum you can be sued for copyright infringement if someone posts a copyrighted picture. Of course it matters a lot where the server is located.

Not if the link is to an origional post. It is like posting a URL.

The presence of the image is only virtual.  The image file is not on the bitcointalk server - only a link to the image.

Removal of the image from the linked site will result in the url displaying

Such site can also block external access to the image.


In the country where I live it is not considered infringement. It is also not disallowed by the bitcointalk rules.

...and that is not even getting into the "fair use" argument or the fact that most, if not all of the images that were linked to are in public domain with no distinguishable ownership.

A lot of the memes are generated on meme makers using royalty free stock photos.

Crazy countries can make crazy laws. But since I don't live in them or plan to visit they have no jurisdiction over me.  If those countries attempt to enforce those crazy laws outside of their own country it may well be breaching the constitutional laws of the country that I live in.

In the majority of civilized countries - linking and framing is not considered copyright infringement.

Quote
In large part, linking and framing are not held to be copyright infringement under US and German copyright law, even though the underlying Web pages are protected under copyright law. Because the copyright-protected content is stored on a server other than that of the linking or framing person (it is stored on the plaintiff's server), there is typically no infringing "copy" made by the defendant linking or framing person (as may be essential), on which to base liability. Some European countries take a more protective view, however, and hold unauthorized framing and so-called deep linking unlawful.

The European Court of Justice's binding ruling in 2014 was that embedding a work could not be a violation of copyright:

The embedding in a website of a protected work which is publicly accessible on another website by means of a link using the framing technology … does not by itself constitute communication to the public within the meaning of [the EU Copyright directive] to the extent that the relevant work is neither communicated to a new public nor by using a specific technical means different from that used for the original communication
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_aspects_of_hyperlinking_and_framing

As long as Bitcointalk follows the DCMA guidelines they have nothing to worry about.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48927165


Thank you for information. I know what you're talking about, but there are several points:
- Links must go to the source of information, where the author's information was posted.
- It is not allowed to distort, edit the integrity of information, without the consent of the author, especially with the aim of humiliating, causing moral damage, etc.

 This is similar to how I will take someone's author's song, vozmu change words, where I will insult the author of the song and will spread on the Internet - by making a link to it on some of the servers on the Internet.

 Therefore, users who distribute my photos without my knowledge have such status as thieves. They stole it and now use it in their messages, edit it, etc.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1926
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide
Technically photos are not in breach of copyright on bitcointalk. The images are hosted on an external server not in control of this website. If there is a breach of copyright it is with the image host and the person who posted it. Bitcointalk only links to the image. In most jurisdictions linking to an image does not result in breach of copyright.


He is actually right, it doesn't matter if it's hosted on an external site or not, if you are the owner of the forum you can be sued for copyright infringement if someone posts a copyrighted picture. Of course it matters a lot where the server is located.

Not if the link is to an origional post. It is like posting a URL.

The presence of the image is only virtual.  The image file is not on the bitcointalk server - only a link to the image.

Removal of the image from the linked site will result in the url displaying

Such site can also block external access to the image.


In the country where I live it is not considered infringement. It is also not disallowed by the bitcointalk rules.

...and that is not even getting into the "fair use" argument or the fact that most, if not all of the images that were linked to are in public domain with no distinguishable ownership.

A lot of the memes are generated on meme makers using royalty free stock photos.

Crazy countries can make crazy laws. But since I don't live in them or plan to visit they have no jurisdiction over me.  If those countries attempt to enforce those crazy laws outside of their own country it may well be breaching the constitutional laws of the country that I live in.

In the majority of civilized countries - linking and framing is not considered copyright infringement.

Quote
In large part, linking and framing are not held to be copyright infringement under US and German copyright law, even though the underlying Web pages are protected under copyright law. Because the copyright-protected content is stored on a server other than that of the linking or framing person (it is stored on the plaintiff's server), there is typically no infringing "copy" made by the defendant linking or framing person (as may be essential), on which to base liability. Some European countries take a more protective view, however, and hold unauthorized framing and so-called deep linking unlawful.

The European Court of Justice's binding ruling in 2014 was that embedding a work could not be a violation of copyright:

The embedding in a website of a protected work which is publicly accessible on another website by means of a link using the framing technology … does not by itself constitute communication to the public within the meaning of [the EU Copyright directive] to the extent that the relevant work is neither communicated to a new public nor by using a specific technical means different from that used for the original communication
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_aspects_of_hyperlinking_and_framing

As long as Bitcointalk follows the DCMA guidelines they have nothing to worry about.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48927165
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
illegal [...] defend my rights through the courts [...] I will sue the forum
Minex shill talks about illegal things and want to sue someone. Maybe court will be interested to hear how minex shill tried to lure people into this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-minexpay-crypto-debit-card-by-minexpaycom-minexcoin-5046331

If this thread contains a dox should it not just be moved to the investigations board?
I believe this is best explanation https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43910598

Sometimes forum members unintentionally break forum rules. I don't think they should be banned for doing good to community, especially not when some scam shill shared his personal information on forum.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
Any scam accusation that links the scam's shills to the scam team via photos is considered a dox?
What about all of the fake team photos constantly busted as lies proven by links to the actual photos with real names? Are all of those bannable doxes also?

He says here it is not even his name..

Be careful !! Fraudsters extortionists are engaged in trolling, making an attack on projects.
These are, presumably, the same scammers (Temhuk,Yurez83,Jedgar, etc.). Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
If the same events happen to you, let me know.


https://medium.com/@minecoinorg/minexcoin-resolutely-reacted-to-the-raging-crime-in-the-network-reward-20-btc-4a23e1ae2f34
For idiots trolls explain:

1. I created a channel under a false name today, especially for you fools.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

2. The card is not fictional, but real. The following batches are expected with a branded design.




Nope,the name is true. Wink  and the card with Minexpay logo is fictional !!!

Yurez83 busted himself  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



Of course, the idiot is all a real name, but not mine. And the name of the account on the forum present, from the Internet ...  





He posted under his real name himself and is now trying to get users banned for busting his scam.


Accidentally,rushing to post newest Minex fake news , Yurez 83 revealed his true identity in the video he posted :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qyhAzxwbI8&feature=youtu.be


His real name is: redacted


redact image





So in his haste to scam people with his referral link, he doxxed himself?

Oh my fucking god.

Yurez 83 is not the sharpest tool in the box is he?

He obviously took down the video once he realized he fucked up.

Oh man, this is hilarious.   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin Grin Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss




If this thread contains a dox should it not just be moved to the investigations board?
Is every post that mentions the name Leroy Fodor or Paul Vernon/Bao Luo a dox too?

I would really hate to see anything bad happen to thunderjet over this.. He is a very trustworthy, helpful, and positive user in my opinion. He is the one to first identify the Cryptsy stolen coins wallets before we even knew they were stolen and iirc may have been the one to bring some of the blockchain information to freeze coins that vern was trying to dump on exchanges saving a lot of coin that eventually ended up in the receivership to compensate the scam victims..
A true legend.
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
 - That's not plagiarism.
 - If there is dox outside of the investigations section, report it with that as the reason.
 - If someone is threatening violence against you, report it with that as the reason.
 - If you have a copyright claim, you have to PM/email me a valid DCMA takedown notice with all required elements, including your address, a declaration under penalty of perjury, etc. Note that I will forward your notice to the affected users.
 - The forum is not under EU jurisdiction.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 28
Referring to an excerpt from the rules of the forum.

My personal data and personal photos are published in the forbidden section. Who can say that this is not a violation?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-republia-leading-edge-ecosystem-and-technology-4841968




p/s  Some messages were deleted in the section with its own moderation, so I can not provide more facts.


legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
What you need is "Right to be Forgotten" to make sure your images/information is removed from this forum. I doubt plagiarism as reason gonna change moderator mind.

The real problems are such right only recognized on EU and few others country & this forum don't bother with it (GDPR, AEPD, etc.)

P.S. i don't know OP history at all
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Your problem isn't about copyright, but about privacy and doxing.

Agreed. Isn’t that a bannable offense as well? Seems like mods are asleep at the wheel when it comes to users posting alleged images of other users in an attempt to dox.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 28
That is, in your opinion, the use of my author's photo for the purpose of causing moral damage and trolling is a "Fair Use"?
Depends, example:


Stop it, just click "Report to moderator" and type your reason as doxing or privacy violation. Let mods decide.
But if you scam people, your odds are small. AFAIK

I'm not guilty of anything. I am not part of the team of the coin, which is accused of something (in my opinion is not legal). I did not take money from anyone ... etc.

If you think that I am guilty of only being a coin investor or holder and at the same time resisting (to fraudsters, in my opinion) who purposefully want to destroy the project with any false accusations, then I am very sorry.
 If these users believe that some kind of fraud is present - they have the right to go to court with facts or to the appropriate authorities. But they have no right to slander.

Therefore, no one exposed me. And no one has the right to impose moral damage on me verbal and over my copyright property.
Pages:
Jump to: