Topic: Quarks first little Political Power struggle - comment and discuss. - page 2. (Read 1951 times)

How do you feel about the forum ?

Coin needs dropped I agree their.

Quark sounds much better than Quarkcoin and gives it another distinctness from bitcoin.

Max wants to drop the "coin" also - i looked at some site we registered a few  - i'm happy to in full hand the keys over to Max-

Coin is stupid for Quark - you can call it a "coin" or "charm " or whatever but it has to stay just Quark < and references to "quarkcoin" need to be gone . 

we are building a different Crypto outside Bitcoin - this is the Second Cryptocurrency -


We are hunting for an awesome  Bootstrap dev -

Flip wants $2500  (in QRK)

^ so if anyone will do it for less  Post here -

as long as only max controlled / hosted it yes !

Max invented this coin, his say should really pull some weight. I respect what Flipro is doing, maybe if he gave max control of the new website that would be a good comprimise.

J

I would like "Max" the Captain of the code ship to have sole hosting power on the website and forum -

for two primary reasons -

1. security
2. he currently is doing the coding and doing a fine job -  

^ if this ever changes - or Max goes dark Quark probably needs a new Dev .  


now.....

Flippro wants to "move our forum"

- 1 . he has been pushing hard to move the Forum to a new location

- 2. he claims the forum is "better designed"  (which is true but i don't care about "better designed")


But i do not want to give him hosting control anywhere its all about controlling the information - ( for the new people) but instead i'd rather Max do that  as he is the center of the community Code at the moment unless he (dumps all his Qrk and goes dark) at which point a fork is in order , until that time he is the Code Dev with the most to benefit ( i hope)  

i'm from a political perspective - i just gave Max the decision -  :

my point is this to Max:

• I don't want to have control - but i don't want anyone other than max to have hosting control either -
• So I want to push hosting control to Max, if Max does not understand  politically ,  what is happening - that's fine he will still look after the code because its a community effort and he has a large interest in doing so -
• We will then ignore the new Forum and I will send a bulk email to our people ( the numbers of investors)  and we will start a basic " Quark investors" forum which i will host ( or I will ask max to host )

I will then direct no more people to the "official" forum if its moved and only to our "investors forum"

i.e We will ignore this new forum  until we have a new website that Max the coder is hosting , and he has sole hosting rights on the forum if its on the website -

Summary

We are happy with the current forum - (it could have some basic little fixes )  (look around) ( its temporary until the Website gets up )

unless Max is the sole host I will ignore the "new" forum i will create my own "investors forum" if i have to - but I'd prefer Max hosted it , as per my policy .



*** i don't see this as disruption to Quark - as all i have to do is send bulk email and/or announce in a video our "investors forum" .

price will continue to trend higher -