Topic: QUESTION: For Gambling Enthusiasts ❗❗ - page 6. (Read 1468 times)
Looking on the probability of winning on those choices the Letter B is more preferrable because you have a chance to win and you can control the game if you are good on those games and also if PVP game it would be fast game and at the same time enjoyable. Though whether what is the best , it is still good to have implement those options because there are people prefer the other choice as they don't match well to those PVP players.
I prefer letter B. PVP gaming but the only downside is the waiting time on when a player will come in. That's where it becomes a boring game because gamblers have a tendency to just look for another game if they find the wait is too long.
Whatever the PVP game is, it should aim for popularity first like the one kids are playing now, MOBA games. It's a different era now, the shift from traditional gambling card games to android battle arena games soared to an extent that they will choose playing skill-based free games and just gamble with friends instead.
If there is one that had not been kicked out of the picture, it's just poker. IMO.
Whatever the PVP game is, it should aim for popularity first like the one kids are playing now, MOBA games. It's a different era now, the shift from traditional gambling card games to android battle arena games soared to an extent that they will choose playing skill-based free games and just gamble with friends instead.
If there is one that had not been kicked out of the picture, it's just poker. IMO.
-snip-
There's also a thing with practice. Would you allow players to play without wagering, just to get to know the game and get better at it before they make their bets? If you do, you'll end up with people experimenting with various tactics and you give them more time to find glitches and bugs they can later use against other players. If you don't do it, the only way to get better would be to put money into the game, so people ready to put a lot of time and money into the game ultimately win more, which makes it a pay to win game.
Like the demo on the gambling Pvp game. This will provide an opportunity for all players to try how to play the game perfectly and be aware of every problem and some bugs that may be found. This will indeed give early players access to experience the game without the need to bet. But preferably, some features must be locked so that you cannot access all game features, if you want to play in full, use several minimum bets to play it. Putting money into the game is a condition that can be done so that players don't just try the PVP game so that there is income to be received from early players.There's also a thing with practice. Would you allow players to play without wagering, just to get to know the game and get better at it before they make their bets? If you do, you'll end up with people experimenting with various tactics and you give them more time to find glitches and bugs they can later use against other players. If you don't do it, the only way to get better would be to put money into the game, so people ready to put a lot of time and money into the game ultimately win more, which makes it a pay to win game.
Currently, there are many cheaters and game crackers who are looking for loopholes in every game, so the game system really has to be built properly.
That said, I'd still choose B, if the game was well made.
But I'm more interested in Casino A. Gambling is synonymous with big wins or Jackpots, so the opportunity to win some big money can be a more desirable attraction with several bets to be made.
What do you mean by "on the same level"?
I'm referring to the quality of the casinos because not all casinos have the same amount of players and that could potentially affect the gambling experience when you're playing in Casino B. If both casinos are on equal footing then the gambling experience would probably be on par with Casino A. Others might disagree and I don't mind, the only reason why I said it is because of my past experience as it's so rare to see PvP casinos thrive and have other games aside from Poker.
I will choose 1. Casino A:
I'm a sucker for casino slots, table card games, dice, craps, and roulette. I'm not that familiar with PVP games although I heard about it but I'm not that interested. And I do agree that these kind of games are not going to be sustainable for casinos as players might be few and individuals are easy to get bored unless a new PVP games comes along, this kind of games might lost the interest of the players very quickly.
If Pvp games does impose high interest then we would see lots of sites offering these games but we are seeing the opposite which it does obviously means that they arent that good enough.I'm a sucker for casino slots, table card games, dice, craps, and roulette. I'm not that familiar with PVP games although I heard about it but I'm not that interested. And I do agree that these kind of games are not going to be sustainable for casinos as players might be few and individuals are easy to get bored unless a new PVP games comes along, this kind of games might lost the interest of the players very quickly.
It do always boils down on someones preference whether they would really be liking some pvp games which there are platforms who do offer such games but mostly
we are seeing casino games which are luck based where i couldnt really blame out people because it is really that entertaining and something you could
enjoy.
I will choose 1. Casino A:
I'm a sucker for casino slots, table card games, dice, craps, and roulette. I'm not that familiar with PVP games although I heard about it but I'm not that interested. And I do agree that these kind of games are not going to be sustainable for casinos as players might be few and individuals are easy to get bored unless a new PVP games comes along, this kind of games might lost the interest of the players very quickly.
I'm a sucker for casino slots, table card games, dice, craps, and roulette. I'm not that familiar with PVP games although I heard about it but I'm not that interested. And I do agree that these kind of games are not going to be sustainable for casinos as players might be few and individuals are easy to get bored unless a new PVP games comes along, this kind of games might lost the interest of the players very quickly.
If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?
I would quickly choose casino A because even though all of these games aren't PvP games, they're still much more convenient to play and they don't require another person to play with.~snip~
Though PVP is still good if your friend and you have the same vacant time to gamble how does possible if both of you got work and a busy life every day and don't have the same vacant time to gamble? If you have that small amount of $10–$100, I prefer to gamble against the house edge, which is you are not required to wait for another player at your convenient time.
I choose casino A.
can say that lots of people are really that interested when it comes to casino games which are against house edge.Its true that if you do really have some ample time and moment that you could
play against other people on the said moment but most of us does really like to play on fast manner or something that doesnt involved other people.
We do love on having that direct deposit and play right away.
what i noticed about most pvp gaming platforms is they can't sustain the interest of players, hence, hard to keep afloat with their business. not many gamblers are also into this type of gaming in long-term basis. maybe just to change the environment but later on most are still going to classic games as they don't need to bother other people, just play on their own. the dilemma with pvp games is the waiting time for the game to get started. and we know, most gamblers have very short patience.
Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.
I opened a topic here recently about this kind of games i just didn’t find the exact name for them and if they are considered as gambling, Some people were saying it’s gambling while others doesn’t agree since you are doing efforts and the game play requires skills in order to make and take your prize. For me i will prefer Casino B since i may have some skills in Fps games and have fun playing them so why not adding more action and fun to it by gambling some dollars to win. I have tried a third party platform that organize games and competitions in famous and popular games such as counter strike, PUBG, 8ball pool…. Both players who want to gamble should pay the platform for example 10dollars and an agent will be watching that game to see result and also detect hackers and cheaters if there’s any then send the prize to the winner in exchange for some fees that the platform take, and in my opinion it’s better than a casino to build all the games
What do you mean by "on the same level"?
It has something to do with the fairness of matchmaking.
Basically, same level = same tier, which means we are competing with a user that might have the same performance as us and not against professional or highly skilled ones. It's more balanced and that's what PVP should be in the usual game. Tournaments should also have limits like there's only a minimum or maximum level or rank that is required to join. In that way, every participant has at least a chance to win.
P.S. Please don't multi-post. Just edit your recent post and include all your replies in those multi-quotes.
If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?
I would quickly choose casino A because even though all of these games aren't PvP games, they're still much more convenient to play and they don't require another person to play with.~snip~
Though PVP is still good if your friend and you have the same vacant time to gamble how does possible if both of you got work and a busy life every day and don't have the same vacant time to gamble? If you have that small amount of $10–$100, I prefer to gamble against the house edge, which is you are not required to wait for another player at your convenient time.
I choose casino A.
I prefer option A playing in a casino although your chances are not high compared to option B is rewarding if you are lucky to hit the jackpot its more challenging because you are up against big odds, although option B is also good if you are good at some of the games you can also test your skill against a human being it's a different experience between the two on Option A you need skill and luck on Option B you need skill to beat your opponent, I still haven't tried option B on all the casinos I'm playing so far.
If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?
If both of them are on the same level then I would switch my pick to casino B but for now, I'll stay with casino A.What do you mean by "on the same level"?
If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?
1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.
2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.
You should have set up a poll for this to see the numbers on who's in favor of A or B or both I prefer A because we are playing in the casino not only to be entertained but also to win a big amount of money but by picking your B you'll only get your opponent's buy-in amounts, so you're earning is limited and it's a good feeling if you can beat the house, not just one player, it will get you motivated to play more.
I try to avoid these type of games as you'll often encounter very good player which only focuses on one game like Pool. I tried playing on a local Pool near me for fun and included some bets on it, but I was obliterated by their experience and skills.
And because skills are necessary as every player is competitive, just imagine the difficulty to win especially in a tournament.
Regardless of how much is the prize pool, expect professional players that will join the tournament. Even though we are skilled and good at that game, there's always a player that is higher beyond our skills, and that makes the competition not balanced.
That ends up with some gamblers just staying on the usual casino games and won't bother to join PVP games even though they know and are skilled in how to play the game. Better not messed up with the pros and increase the risks of losing.
If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?
I would quickly choose casino A because even though all of these games aren't PvP games, they're still much more convenient to play and they don't require another person to play with.I still enjoy playing PvP games but I don't have the best experience with them since I don't play Poker that much and then the other option to experience PvP is through contests which are rarely enjoyable. If both of them are on the same level then I would switch my pick to casino B but for now, I'll stay with casino A.
For a pure fun experience, I would choose the first option which is Casino A as most of the games included in it are Luck- Based games which for me is the main purpose of gambling itself. However, there are some games included on Casino B that may be a PVP type of game but also depends on luck such as card games like poker.
For a competitive gameplay experience, Casino B would be the best pick as it will depend on the skills of each player itself whether they may have a chance of winning or not. I try to avoid these type of games as you'll often encounter very good player which only focuses on one game like Pool. I tried playing on a local Pool near me for fun and included some bets on it, but I was obliterated by their experience and skills.
For a competitive gameplay experience, Casino B would be the best pick as it will depend on the skills of each player itself whether they may have a chance of winning or not. I try to avoid these type of games as you'll often encounter very good player which only focuses on one game like Pool. I tried playing on a local Pool near me for fun and included some bets on it, but I was obliterated by their experience and skills.
If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?
1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.
2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.
You should have set up a poll for this to see the numbers on who's in favor of A or B or both I prefer A because we are playing in the casino not only to be entertained but also to win a big amount of money but by picking your B you'll only get your opponent's buy-in amounts, so you're earning is limited and it's a good feeling if you can beat the house, not just one player, it will get you motivated to play more.
PVP gaming is really a thing but only for those who are skilled enough in that particular and specific game.
Not all do have those skills that's why others preferred just playing the usual casino games and find their luck. PVP type of gaming is also for experienced ones that a pre-knowledge about the game is really necessary before anyone wants to compete with others with stake money.
There are also games that might be prone to some cheats or any sort of game bot e.g chess, checkers, pool, billiards etc. and we don't know if we are against a real human or a bot.
I would prefer the pvp if I am playing with little fund because I wouldn't want to make the mistake of taking the risk of losing money easily without knowing how good and experienced the person I am playing with good be.
If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?
1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.
2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.
If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.
So it depends on individual personality
And where do you see yourself fitting most?
This questions and comparison between pvp and casino games might not be fair, and this is because -
Pvp games requires a good level of skill to be able to win, while casino games on the other hand is purely luck based, those who lack the skill to challenge or play against other gamblers will definitely settle for casino games, while those who have the skill winning the game requires will choose to settle with pvp games..
But if I was asked to make a choice as to which I think is more fun to play, I would prefer pvp games over casino games, I think nothing is more fun in gambling than challenging other players.
So, each has their own community. Pvp games requires a good level of skill to be able to win, while casino games on the other hand is purely luck based, those who lack the skill to challenge or play against other gamblers will definitely settle for casino games, while those who have the skill winning the game requires will choose to settle with pvp games..
But if I was asked to make a choice as to which I think is more fun to play, I would prefer pvp games over casino games, I think nothing is more fun in gambling than challenging other players.
Jump to: