-snip-
We're positioning ourselves as KYC-free exchanger and respect customers privacy, but hope that our customers respect us as well, what means they do not try to exchange "dirty" coins through us in order to get "clean" coins in return.
You should stop lying. You are contradictory, and you are acting against the interests of your users by doing so!
Moreover, you dared to claim that you were
“promoting a more equitable and decentralized financial system” in some other thread, which is absolutely not the case. The
only thing you're promoting is a "dirty/clean coin separation", which is a total shame.
You don't respect your customers privacy, because if you did, you wouldn't be looking for excuses to freeze funds under false pretences of AML.
You are not legit to request SoF, nor to freeze funds, nor to request any personal data from your customers, as you are not even a registered company: -snip-
Also, how you could explain that according to the Seychelles business registry search (
https://www.registry.gov.sc/BizRegistration/WebSearchBusiness.aspx) your company does not seem to exist?
Could you please publish a digital copy of your company's business registration certificate in order to prove that company exists? Note that you should have no issues with doing so, because a Seychelles business certificate does not contain any personal data, therefore if you refuse to do so, you are most probably trying to lie about that company, which might expose you as a fraudulent actor.
Note also that operating as a non-existent company is a prosecutable criminal act.
What's an exchange that isn't registered as a company and yet applies AML procedures (probably carried out with more than dubious tools such as AMLBot, by the way) without any legal framework?
It's just an exchange that will freeze your funds based on false AML pretexts, and that
you should avoid. They will ask you for source of funds and harass you with long KYC procedures (sometimes even impossible to complete in a good faith), with the goal to keep your funds. At least, if they didn't want “dirty” coins, when they receive some, they could send them straight back to their users. Case closed. Why this need to harass them with KYC procedures if “
an equitable and decentralized financial system” is so important to them?
In my opinion, you're just one more enemy of BTC and of the community in general.