1. You are not a claimant (victim), thus by Theymos's standards you are not permitted to create a contractual violation flag.
Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct?
Correct.
2. The affected parties were not only refunded, they have forgiven Quickseller.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12366566https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12366803https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12352452"Lauda alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Quickseller violated a written contract,
resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here.
Quickseller did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around September 2015. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance."
You are endorsing a false statement. No damages were incurred, any fees for services not actually rendered have been refunded, and those effected have forgiven Quickseller.
3. That is a cute local rule excluding people from defending themselves, or those most likely to defend them from posting. Also local rules not added with the original post are not valid. You edited the OP to add the local rule after I posted. Good luck getting that enforced.
Quote for reference:
Since theymos introduced a flawed flag system, this has to be done. Original thread is locked and can't be directly quoted from. Every escrow deal ever conducted possibly has a victim in it, thus the damage has always been extensive.
I wouldn't have come across this if it hadn't been for the long saga of quickseller abuse I've been suffering. But recently he's started using a new alt/sockpuppet to try to attack me and I started looking more closely at the situation. I realized that it seems that Panthers52 has done several deals which were escrowed by Quickseller. The fact that Quickseller is escrowing for himself seems like a scammy behavior. I'm not a trader here so it may be that there's nothing wrong with this. But in any case, I'll go ahead and present some quantitative evidence here and you guys can discuss it as you please.
You can read the full story by clicking on the quote or by using this link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059.
Therefore, a newly created flag would be valid and should remain active for all eternity (IMO - 10 years is nothing for this scammer). Flags can't be edited, flags can't be removed nor updated.
Local rule; the following users are not allowed to post: Quickseller, TECHSHARE, OgNasty, cryptohunter and anyone else with more negative ratings than other ratings (people without ratings excl. newly created shill accounts are welcome).
