Topic: Quickseller receives 20BTC, does not do work, keeps $ **not disputed!** - page 5. (Read 3513 times)

I got a good chuckle out of this post.  *shakes head *

Anything involving courts and lawyers is going to take a long time.

Watching this thread for lols.

Do you think he's retired and sitting on a beach with an ipad trying to troll everyone, or... I don't get it. why would some dude who claims to be rich be sitting around all mad at people and picking fights? I don't see either of us doing that, right?

Cheers!

Bumping since Quickseller continues to accuse others of wrongdoing, while holding onto stolen coins himself.  :/

Let's try and keep this on topic please.

Pleased to oblige.

Hahah... Everyone should neg this Shit Nugget ....

If you have 1 mil + in btc, why are you scamming people for 35,000?

Seems like a waste of time...

Wow, you are funny.  Do you also do stand-up?

https://web.archive.org/web/20180315002952/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0#msg32332066

https://web.archive.org/web/20180315002952/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0#msg32332407

Do not trust single word from this scam artist runing ponzi schemes and scamming around under his green trust rating.
Feel free to check his untrusted feedback and see who you are dealing with.
You were warned.

I believe that someone had the displeasure of meeting QS either online or IRL, then had a particular messy shit afterwards.. put two and two together and came up with the QS/Stink nugget combo?

I sincerely regret opening that link and then reading that description. The only question I have is why would someone go all that extent to define a term for something like that. What is the state of mind? Do they wake up thinking about the turd that stays stuck on their ass and wonder "I should define a term and lay the law that unwanted turds should only be referred to hence forth as a Stink Nugget"

QS is a true stink nugget.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=stink%20nugget for reference.

he has no friends other than the two mentioned above

I'm fairly new too (but used to lurk here without an account) but have skimmed though some of the infamous accusation thread in here. Pretty sure in the "Lauda removed from DT" thread TMAN or someone else mentioned a link between QS and Tomatocage. Now I have little idea how true the claim is or is not but I guess it would be safe to say there isn't bad blood between QS and TC. So there's one more in the "known" personalities I suppose

Quickseller has here cadged valuable tutoring and consulting from me.  Compare the above to the underlined portions below, plus scores of other posts I made on the same and similar subjects.  Although he is misapplying the lesson insofar as Vod presented colourable evidence, that is not my fault; what matters is that he clearly used my instruction to craft his above-quoted response.

I do not give freebies; consider this to be my bill:  I deem my consulting in this case to be worth 1.31337 BTC.  Quickseller, tell me when you’re ready to pay for services rendered; whereupon I’ll post a fresh address.

Take notice that you must pay promptly.  Take further notice that if you fail to so do, I shall sue you in Internet Court and notify the management of Bitcoin to revoke your wallet.

---

Thanks for the public notice, Vod.  I did not know about the link between Quickseller and TradeFortress; though of course, I read a bit about TradeFortress in the forum archives.

Being new here, I need to ask a question:  Other than a select few such as Mr. Nasty and TradeFortress, is there any well-known forum personality (past or present) with whom Quickseller does not have a fight?

I ask, because I was trying to compile a list of Quickseller’s enemies.  Whereupon I realized that perhaps the opposite task may be easier:  Compile a list of those who are not so.

Really, I can understand making some enemies.  (Really—I of all people can understand that.)  But when someone does most nothing but, that may be indicative.

---

“They’re Quicksy and the Brain...”  (You did say “wackadoodle”.  Wait, TF is the Brain?)

Nah, that's way too simple

This is Quicksy we're talking about so the scheme should be appropriately wackadoodle.

Maybe there was an elaborate extortion involving voodoo dolls.
Maybe TF has a pistachio addiction.
Maybe QS had a brain transplant and TF was the donor.

Well, I'm clearly not up to the task, but if we completely disengage from reality à la Quicksy then there is no level of stupid we couldn't sink to.

I must admit the circumstantial evidence is quite damning. Quickseller, what did you do with the BTC? I think you hoodwinked Tradefortress.

I took the implied accusations in this thread as an attempt to mock your recent threads, combined with possibly a bit of retaliation. I realize this thread may have been started for other reasons or to make a point, in a witty/mocking sort of way, but your threads have similar characteristics and I look for any facts or evidence you may present that is worth looking at, as I've done here.

As was the case with an outrageous claim about a pill addiction, you started it with zero evidence (but the possibility of good evidence) and ultimately just made statements about a secret source whom you would never name nor present any evidence the source gave you. Vod is starting this thread maybe with a bit of subjective mocking but also providing blockchain & post evidence showing TF sent you 20BTC for the purpose of a civil action lawsuit against Vod and you appear to have received it and never did anything with it. Is it your claim you did pursue a lawsuit or are you denying this transaction ever happened?  I'm curious what your stance is here?



How is this prima facie evidence?
I'll agree he began the same trollish-like behavior on these threads that have been done in the past with other threads attacking him, which could be interpreted as a hypersensitive reaction for someone who is frequently attacked with threads of this nature.
Lauda implicitly or explicitly denying the allegation is a denial of the allegation.
Whether he said he was or was not going to respond beforehand doesn't seem relevant.

When you finish with "and later claim", this has not happened yet, and appears like speculation, so I've disregarded the rest of this sentence until additional evidence is presented.
Could this be prima facie evidence if your speculation comes true, maybe if any evidence is strong enough, but one will never know because you don't seem to be willing to show any evidence and this comes off as prima facie evidence that you are acting in bad faith.

I remember a while back that BadBear told me he used to be positive QS was TradeFortress, but then over time didn't believe it anymore. I wonder if there was any IP evidence tying them together somehow? I  think it's probably more likely QS bought that account than them being truly the same person but I guess you never know. If I recall correctly QS had thread trying to buy Donator/ VIP accounts at one point.

This is also possible:



Maybe TF just sent money to himself and gave QS an address to post publicly.

MOAR SKAMS!

QS is the lowest of the low, anyone you associate with is the same by default. I am greatly surprised that you haven't spent these coins yet..

so what are you going to do? man up and return the funds? send them to charity?

or just keep and become even more scummy?

to be fair, the title is a bit disingenuous. the allegation is that QS received 20 BTC from TF. at the time, BTC was trading ~ $230, putting the amount netted ~ $4600.

also, it's conceivable (perhaps unlikely) that QS claimed to have received funds but never actually did. we don't have evidence that he posted the address in question. he could have done this as a scare tactic. however, this doesn't explain the involvement of the TF account.


what was the actual agreement?

Blockchain evidence

vs

Things Quickseller says

That's a tough one.

LOL.

No.

But it's hilarious, mostly in the hypocrisy department. "The OP is likely operating in bad faith (in multiple ways)" describes most threads QS creates. QS is basically admitting that he's trowing shit at the wall and hoping that "additional evidence" will surface at some point in the future.