Short for what I'd consider fair: him to review the rating to something more accurate/change it to a comment saying that he personally doesn't trust me/remove the rating.
I edited the rating to remove the statement that "an agreement was reach" despite that I still believe that fact to be true.
I don't think you have disputed any of the facts in my adjusted rating.
I had noticed that the OP was changed requesting that the text of my negative trust be updated to something more accurate, so I edited it (deleted and reposted) to something that reflects facts that are undisputed. Unsurprisingly the OP has continued trolling and has not stated this is resolved.
Gotta admit, I didn't notice that. We don't get a notification for trust ratings you know.
Plust this thread has 5k views and 11 post pages till now. I didn't notice this reply, sorry.
Anyway, now that I noticed... I'll admit that the current rating is a bit more accurate. However, I didn't request you to make this change with my latest change in the OP. It was there since the original post from April 13 and you changed the rating today.
Another thing, I'm not trolling. I don't appreciate most of your posts as well but I don't devalue them by saying that you're trolling, please avoid that in the future.
And also, I don't find your rating completely innacurate as I already admited. But still not 100% accurate so this is not resolved for me.
I know that we've been over this many times, but what you consider a scammy action (me exiting the escrow) was in fact a result of my anger towards you (and this anger still holds slightly, maybe that's why you think I'm trolling you). And what would I have scammed someone out of? Actually nothing, you claim that I would have the name of the account revealed to me and therefore try to ruin the accounts reputation. Why on earth would I do that?
Which still seems unreasonable to me because I didn't specifically ask you to change the account's pass before I funded your address but you claimed that I did multiple times here which is ridiculus.
And you saying that my conditions were met, is partly true. But this wasn't thanks to you. The other party did hand you the account before I sent you the funds although that didn't came in agreement with
your terms.
BUT This wasn't something I was expecting since I had contacted you prior to that informing you that I would be exiting the deal if you didn't change the terms and you replied saying that you won't change the terms (also before receiving the account).
And even though this happened in a way you described as unsecure. Did I take the chance to bring on my
scammy plans? I never did because I didn't plan on scamming someone in the first place, but you still gave me a negative rating (probably because you were also angry at me or something) which is undertandable.
Short for what I'd consider fair: him to review the rating to something more accurate/change it to a comment saying that he personally doesn't trust me/remove the rating.
^^ you also missed the point of it saying to change your rating to a personal comment (neutral rating). Your latest rating is a bit more accurate but in my opinion not 100% fair.
After all the backlash in this thread you reviewed the rating, that's good. But I still don't consider this resolved.
Lastly, thanks for bringing the discussion back on topic. Please try to always be accurate and objective with your ratings.
