Saphire is great
the vaphor-x is king trust me
Asus is Very nice the CU II its amazing
Gigabyte sometimes hard to set it good
HIS is prety nice
XFX Run awayyyy
personal opinion.
Topic: r9 290x - page 2. (Read 1993 times)
I concur with the Sapphire recommendations, both on R9 280x and R9 290.
It isn't that Gigabtye is bad...Sapphire is just better! :-)
It isn't that Gigabtye is bad...Sapphire is just better! :-)
Reason? you got to clock the sapphire one more to get as much khash
I concur with the Sapphire recommendations, both on R9 280x and R9 290.
It isn't that Gigabtye is bad...Sapphire is just better! :-)
It isn't that Gigabtye is bad...Sapphire is just better! :-)
People told me to get Gigabyte too but I found out it was one of the slowest at mining.
Sapphire is the fastest in my experience. The people giving you advice probably never tried out any other brands, but for the same exact graphics card, Gigabyte gives very poor performance in terms of mining.
Sapphire is the fastest in my experience. The people giving you advice probably never tried out any other brands, but for the same exact graphics card, Gigabyte gives very poor performance in terms of mining.
don't get xfx, get gigabyte
Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 Graphics Card (3GB GDDR5, DVI, HDMI, 2x DVI)
isnt good this GPU for mining LTC?
don't get xfx, get gigabyte
gigabyte usually works fast without major tuning while sapphire may need oc to reach same khs
So I'm gonna purchase a R9 290x and I was wondering if there is any difference between the sapphire/msi/xfx/msi and gigabyte model for mining?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Jump to: